Assessment in Bologna context from the teaching perspective, similarities and differences between disciplines

  1. Fernández Ruiz, Javier 1
  2. Panadero, Ernesto 1
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Revista:
Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje

ISSN: 0719-6202

Año de publicación: 2019

Título del ejemplar: XII Congreso Internacional de Evaluación Formativa y Compartida - “Buenas prácticas de evaluación formativa y compartida en todas las etapas educativas”

Volumen: 5

Número: 2

Páginas: 456-462

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.22370/IEYA.2019.5.2.1711 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

In higher education, assessment is especially significant due to the high level of autonomy and self-regulation that is assumed in the students at this stage. While there is a bulk of research on which assessment evidences are used in higher education, research on how university professors design these evidences is lacking. Using a mixed method technique, we analyzed the assessment methodologies used in three different degrees (Mathematics, Medicine and Sport Sciences), and the design process followed by the teachers in each degree. We found important differences in the assessment methodologies used and the approaches to the assessment design in the degrees. This study shows the way in which teachers of different degrees modified their assessment methods during the Bologna process, as well as the factors that influenced them throughout the process.