Assessment in Bologna context from the teaching perspective, similarities and differences between disciplines

  1. Fernández Ruiz, Javier 1
  2. Panadero, Ernesto 1
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Aldizkaria:
Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje

ISSN: 0719-6202

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Zenbakien izenburua: XII Congreso Internacional de Evaluación Formativa y Compartida - “Buenas prácticas de evaluación formativa y compartida en todas las etapas educativas”

Alea: 5

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 456-462

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.22370/IEYA.2019.5.2.1711 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

In higher education, assessment is especially significant due to the high level of autonomy and self-regulation that is assumed in the students at this stage. While there is a bulk of research on which assessment evidences are used in higher education, research on how university professors design these evidences is lacking. Using a mixed method technique, we analyzed the assessment methodologies used in three different degrees (Mathematics, Medicine and Sport Sciences), and the design process followed by the teachers in each degree. We found important differences in the assessment methodologies used and the approaches to the assessment design in the degrees. This study shows the way in which teachers of different degrees modified their assessment methods during the Bologna process, as well as the factors that influenced them throughout the process.