¿Cómo emplear las rúbricas para implementar una verdadera evaluación formativa?

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Álvarez, J. M. (2005). Evaluar para conocer, examinar para excluir (2nd ed.). Madrid: Morata.
• Andrade, H., y Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.
• Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–18.
• Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., y Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students’ writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 199–214. doi:10.1080/09695941003696172
• Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y., y Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment and Self-Efficacy for Writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287–302. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.4.287-302
• Andrade, H., y Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. doi:10.1080/00405840802577544
• Arter, J., y McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/ Sage.
• Bain, K. (2006). Lo que hacen los mejores profesores universitarios. Valencia: Publicacions Universitat de València.
• Bandura, A. (2003). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
• Barberá, E. (1999). Evaluación de la enseñanza, evaluación del aprendizaje. Barcelona: Edebé.
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. doi:10.1007/bf00138871.
• Black, P., y Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.
• Boekaerts, M., y Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 199–210.
• Boekaerts, M., y Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology-an International Review- Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 54(2), 199–231.
• Bordas, I., y Cabrera, F. A. (2001). Estrategias de evaluación de los aprendizajes basados en el proceso. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 218, 25–48.
• Boud, D. (1995). How does self-assessment relate to ideas about learning? En D. Boud (Ed.), Enhancing learning through self-assessment (pp. 24–35). New York: Routledge Falmer.
• Brown, G. T. L., y Harris, L. R. (2013). Student Self-Assessment. En J. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25.
• Fernández, J. (2006). ¿Evaluación? No gracias, calificación. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 243, 92–97.
• Gezie, A., Khaja, K., Chang, V. N., Adamek, M. E., y Johnsen, M. B. (2012). Rubrics as a Tool for Learning and Assessment: What Do Baccalaureate Students Think? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 32(4), 421–437. doi:10.1080/08841233.2012.705240
• Good, T. L. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 32-47. doi:10.1177/002248718703800406.
• Goodrich Andrade, H. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education, 4(4).
• Jackson, C. W., y Larkin, M. J. (2002). Teaching Students to Use Grading Rubrics. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(1), 40–45.
• Jonsson, A., y Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
• Kocakülah, M. S. (2010). Development and application of a rubric for evaluating students’ performance on Newton's laws of motion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 146–164. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9188-9
• Kostons, D., van Gog, T., y Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121–132.
• Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self- regulation. En M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, y M. Zeidne (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111–169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Lan, W. Y. (1998). Teaching self-monitoring skills in statistics. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 86–105). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• López, V. M. (2004). Evaluación, calificación, credencialismo y formación inicial del profesorado. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 18(3), 221–232.
• López-Pastor, V. M. (2009). Evaluación formativa y compartida en Educación Superior. Propuestas, técnicas, instrumentos y experiencias. Madrid: Narcea.
• McConnell, K. D. (2013). Rubrics as catalysts for collaboration: a modest proposal. European Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 74–88. doi:10.1080/21568235.2013.778043
• McDonald, R., Boud, D., Francis, J., y Gonczi, A. (2000). Nuevas perspectivas sobre la evaluación. Boletín Cintefor, 149, 41–72.
• Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing Scoring Rubrics for Your Classroom. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(25). Disponible en: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25
• Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance assessments and scoring rubrics. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(14). Disponible en: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=14
• Panadero, E. (2011). Ayudas instruccionales a la autoevaluación y la autorregulación: Evaluación de eficacia de guiones de autoevaluación frente a la de las rúbricas. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
• Panadero, E., y Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and Practical Connotations. When it Happens, How is it Acquired and what to do to Develop it in our Students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551–576.
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., y Huertas, J. A. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 37(1), 149–183. doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.881655
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., y Courtney, M. (2014). Teachers’ reasons for using self-assessment: a survey self-report of Spanish teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(4), 365–383. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.919247
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., y Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
• Panadero, E., y Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
• Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., y Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning Through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation. En D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation (pp. 311–326). Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0
• Panadero, E., y Romero, M. (2014). To Rubric or Not to Rubric? The Effects of Self-Assessment in Self-Regulation, Performance and Self-Efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133–148.
• Panadero, E., Romero, M., y Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on construct validity of peer assessment, perceived fairness and comfort, and performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
• Parke, C. S. (2001). An Approach That Examines Sources of Misfit to Improve Performance Assessment Items and Rubrics. Educational Assessment, 7(3), 201–225. doi:10.1207/S15326977EA0703
• Pérez, Á., Soto, E., Sola, M., y Serván, M. J. (2009). La evaluación como aprendizaje (Vol. 6). Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
• Petkov, D., y Petkova, O. (2006). Development of Scoring Rubrics for IS Projects as an Assessment Tool IS Academic Program. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3, 499–510. Disponible en: http://proceedings.informingscience.org/InSITE2006/IISITPetk214.pdf
• Popham, W. J. (1997). What’s wrong – and what’s right – with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55(2), 72–75.
• Reddy, Y. M. (2007). Effect of Rubrics on Enhancement of Student Learning. Educate Journal, 7(1), 3–17.
• Reddy, Y. M., y Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859
• Rekalde Rodríguez, I., y Buján Vidales, K. (2014). Las eRúbricas ante la evaluación de competencias transversales en Educación Superior. Revista Complutense de Educación, 25(2), 355–374. doi:10.5209/rev_RCED.2014.v25.n2.41594
• Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(8). Disponible en: http://www.pareonline.net/pdf/v15n8.pdf
• Santos, M. Á. (2003). Una flecha en la diana: La evaluación como aprendizaje. Madrid: Narcea.
• Schafer, W. D., Swanson, G., Bene, N., y Newberry, G. (2001). Effects of teacher knowledge of rubrics on student achievement in four content areas. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 151-170.
• Schamber, J. F., y Mahoney, S. L. (2006). Assessing and improving the quality of group critical thinking exhibited in the final projects of collaborative learning groups. The Journal of General Education, 55(2), 103–137. doi:10.1353/jge.2006.0025
• Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal-setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159–172.
• Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as Learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294.
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 2–14.
• Winne, P. H., y Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. En D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, y A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189–205.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. En M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
• Zimmerman, B. J., y Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge.