Development and validity of the Emotion and Motivation Self-Regulation Questionnaire (EMSR-Q)

  1. Alonso Tapia, Jesús 1
  2. Panadero, Ernesto 2
  3. Ruiz Díaz, Miguel Ángel 2
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

  2. 2 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/052g8jq94

Journal:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 17

Pages: 1-15

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2014.41 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

This study has two objectives, first, to develop and validate the �Emotion and Motivation Self-regulation Questionnaire� (EMSR-Q), and second, to analyze (in the context of the questionnaire validation process) the relationships between self-regulation styles (SRS) rooted in goal orientations, and classroom motivational climate (CMC). A total of 664 Secondary Education students from Madrid (Spain) formed the sample of the study. It was divided randomly in two groups to perform confirmatory factor analysis and to cross-validate the results. Both analyses supported a five first-order factor structure, organized around two second-order factors, �Learning self-regulation style� (LSR) and �Avoidance self-regulation style� (ASR): (? 2 /df = 2.71; GFI = .89; IFI = .84; CFI = .84; RMSEA = .07). Hypotheses concerning the relationships between SRS, goal orientations and expectancies are supported by additional correlation and factor analyses. Moreover, several regression analyses supported for the most part of the remaining hypotheses concerning the role of self-regulation styles as predictors of classroom motivational climate (CMC) perception, of change in self-regulation attributed to teacher work, and of students� satisfaction with this same work. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Bibliographic References

  • Alonso-Tapia J. (2005). Motives, expectancies and valueinterests related to learning: The MEVA questionnaire. Psicothema, 17, 404-411.
  • Alonso-Tapia J., & Fernández B. (2008). Development and initial validation of the classroom motivational climate questionnaire (CMCQ). Psicothema, 20, 883-889.
  • Alonso-Tapia J.,Fernández B. (2009 A model for analyzing the classroom motivational climate: Crosscultural validity and educational implications Infancia y Aprendizaje 32 597-612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1174%2F021037009789610368
  • Alonso-Tapia J., Huertas J. A., & Ruiz M. A. (2010). On the nature of motivational orientations: Implications of assessed goals and gender differences for motivational goal theory. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 231-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600003814
  • Alonso-Tapia J., Nieto C., & Ruiz M. (2013). Measuring subjective resilience despite adversity due to family, peers and teachers. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 16, 1-13. http://dx.doi:10.1017/sjp.2013.33
  • Alonso-Tapia J., & Panadero E. (2010). Effect of selfassessment scripts on self-regulation and learning. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33, 385-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037010792215145
  • Alonso-Tapia J., & Pardo A. (2006). Assessment of learning environment motivational quality from the point of view of secondary and high school learners. Learning and Instruction, 16, 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.002
  • Ames C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.84.3.261
  • Arbuckle J. L. (2003). Amos 5.0 Update to the Amos User's Guide. Chicago, CA: Small Waters.
  • Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Nueva York, NY: Freeman.
  • Biggs J. (1987). The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) manual. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Boekaerts M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation and self-regulati on of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 408-425). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Boekaerts M., & Corno L. (2005). Self-regulation in th e classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology-An International Review, 54, 199-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x.
  • Brown W., & Holtzman W. (1967). Manual: Survey of study habits and attitudes. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
  • Castañeda S. (2004). Educación, aprendizaje y cognición. Teoría en la práctica. [Education. learning and cognition. Theory in practice]. México D F, México: Manual Moderno.
  • Cleary T. J. (2011). Emergence of self-regulated learning microanalysis: Historical overview, essential features, and implications for research and practice. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 329-345). New York, NY: Routledge
  • Corno L. (2011). Studying self-regulation habits. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 361-375). New York, NY: Routledge
  • Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: NY. Plenum Press.
  • Dignath C., & Büttner G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-Analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognitio n and Learning, 3, 231-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-X
  • Dignath C., Büttner G., & Langfeldt H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effe ctively? A meta-Analysis on selfregulation training programs. Educational Research Review, 3, 101-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
  • Dugan R. (2007). Examining the construct validity of academic self-regulation using the Survey of Academic Self-regulation (SASR). New York, NY: Albany.
  • Dweck C. S., & Elliot E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Han dbook of child psychology. Vol IV: Social and personality development. (pp. 643-691). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Eccles J. S., & Wigfield A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901. 135153
  • Efklides A. 2011 Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL Model. Educationa l Psychologist 46 6-25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
  • Elliot A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Fernández B. (2009). Development and validation of the Classroom Motivational Climate Questionnaire (CMCQ). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Madrid, Spain.
  • Geisler-Bernstein E., & Schmeck R. R. (1996). The revised inventory of learning processes: A multifaceted perspective of individual differences in learning. In M. Birembaum & F. Doch y (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge. (pp. 283-317). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  • Hair J. F., Black W. C., Babin B. J., Anderson R. E., & Tathan R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
  • Heckhausen H. (1991). Motivation and action. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Hulleman C. S., Schrager S. M., Bodmann S. M., & Harackiewicz J. M. (2010). A meta-Analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same construct or different constructs with similar labels? Psychologica l Bulletin, 136, 422-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018947
  • Kuhl J. (1994). A theory of action and state orientations. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. (pp. 9-45). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe.
  • Kuhl J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zaidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • McCombs B. L. (1999). What role does perceptual psychology play in educational reform today? In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), Perceiving, behaving, becoming: Lessons learned (pp. 148-157). Alexandria: VA. A ssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Meece J. L., Anderman E. M., & Anderman L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych. 56.091103.070258
  • Meichenbaum D., & Goodman J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0030773
  • Midgley C., Maher M. L., Hruda L. Z., Anderman E., Anderman L., Freeman K. E., ⋯ & Urdan T. (2000), Manual for the Patte rns of Adaptive Learning Scales.Michigan, MI: University of Michigan.
  • Perry N. E., & Rahim A, (2011). Studying self-regulating in classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regul ation of learning and performance (pp. 122-136). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Pintrich P. R., Smith D. A., García T., & McKeachi W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
  • Schmitz B., Klug J., & Schmidt M. (2011). Assessing self-regulating learning using diary measures with university students. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H.Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 251-266). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Schraw G., & Dennison R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
  • Senko C., Hulleman C. S., & Harackiewicz J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538646
  • Stoegler H., & Ziegler A. (2011). Self-regulatory training thro ugh elementary school students' homework completion. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 87-101). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Weiner B. (1986). An attributio nal theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Weinstein C. E., Palmer D. R., & Schulte A. C. (1987). LASSI: Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Clearwater, FL: H&H Publishing.
  • Winne P. H. (2011 A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulation learning In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15-32). New York, NY Routledge.
  • Winne P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulation learning. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15-32). New York, NY: Routledge. Wolters C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804-1
  • Zimmerman B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/000 2831207312909
  • Zimmerman B. J., & Schunk D. H. (2011a). Self-regulating learning and performance: An introduction and overview. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and perfo rmance (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Zimmerman B. J., & Schunk D. H. (2011b). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge.
Data source: Dialnet