Revisión sobre autoevaluación educativaevidencia empírica de su implementación a través de la autocalificación sin criterios de evaluación, rúbricas y guiones

  1. Panadero, Ernesto
  2. Alonso Tapia, Jesús
Revista:
Revista de investigación en educación

ISSN: 1697-5200 2172-3427

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 11

Número: 2

Páginas: 172-197

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de investigación en educación

Resumen

Esta revisión analiza trabajos sobre autoevaluación agrupados en: (1) autocalificación, o autoevaluación sin criterios de evaluación, (2) autoevaluación usando rúbricas y (3) autoevaluación usando guiones. Tras una búsqueda bibliográfica, se realizó un análisis narrativo del contenido de los diferentes estudios seleccionados. Con respecto a la autoevaluación sin criterios de evaluación destaca la falta de uniformidad en los resultados obtenidos por los distintos estudios aunque, en general muestran que la misma no garantiza un aprendizaje profundo de los alumnos. El uso de rúbricas y guiones presenta mejores efectos en el aprendizaje pero quedan aspectos por investigar: los estudios con rúbricas tienen diseños empíricos débiles y los estudios con guiones no han sido realizados en contextos reales. Las conclusiones indican que ofrece más garantías el uso de rúbricas y guiones. Se señalan líneas futuras de investigación.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alonso-Tapia, J. y Panadero, E. (2010). Effect of self-assessment scripts on self-regulation and learning. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33 (3), 385397.
  • Alonso-Tapia, J., Panadero, E. y Ruiz, M.A. (2014). Development and validity of the Emotion and Motivation Self-regulation Questionnaire (EMSR-Q): Intertwined effects between selfregulation styles and classroom motivational climate. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17.
  • Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic selfassessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. J. Andrade y G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of Formative assessment. New York: Routledge.
  • Andrade, H., Buff, C., Terry, J., Erano, M. y Paolino, S. (2009). Assessment-driven improvements in middle school students’ writing. Middle School Journal, 40 (4), 4-12.
  • Andrade, H. y Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10 (3), 111. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10yn=3
  • Andrade, H., Du, Y. y Mycek, K. (2010). Rubricreferenced self-assessment and middle school students' writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17 (2), 199-214. doi: 10.1080/09695941003696172
  • Andrade, H., Du, Y. y Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced selfassessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27 (2).
  • Andrade, H. y Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through selfassessment. Theory Into Practice, 48 (1), 12-19.
  • Andrade, H., Wang, X.L., Du, Y. y Akawi, R.L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102 (4), 287-301.
  • Atkinson, R.K., Renkl, A. y Merrill, M.M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (4), 774-783. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.774
  • Bannert, M. (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts. Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie, 23 (2), 139-145. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.139
  • Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M. y Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (4), 829-835. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.07.002
  • Berthold, K., Nückles, M. y Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17 (5), 564-577. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
  • Black, P. y Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan.
  • Boekaerts, M. y Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology-an International Review-psychologie Appliqueerevue Internationale, 54 (2), 199-231.
  • Boud, D. (1995). What is learner self-assessment? En D. Boud (Ed.). Enhancing learning through self-assessment (pp. 11-23). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Boud, D. y Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher-education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18 (5), 529-549. doi: 10.1007/BF00138746
  • Brown, G.T.L. Glasswell, K. y Harland, D. (2004). Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system. Assessing Writing, 9 (2), 105-121. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.001
  • Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and metaanalysis. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  • Deci, E. L. y Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  • Dignath, C. y Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231-264. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
  • Dochy, F. (2006). A guide for writing scholarly articles or reviews for the Educational Research Review. Educational Research Review. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/educationalresearch-review/
  • Dochy, F., Segers, M. y Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peerand co-assessment in higher education. A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24 (3), 331-350.
  • Dreher, M.J. y Brown, R.F. (1993). Planning prompts and indexed terms in textbook search tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (4), 662-669.
  • Elischberger, H.B., y Roebers, C.M. (2001). Improving young children's free narratives about an observed event: The effects of nonspecific verbal prompts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25 (2), 160-166.
  • Ertl, B., Fischer, F. y Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education, 47, 298-315.
  • Falchikov, N. y Boud, D. (1989). Student selfassessment in higher education: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 59 (4), 395-430.
  • Ge, X. y Land, S.M. (2001, November). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes on an illstructured task using questions prompts and peer interactions. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Atlanta.
  • Goodrich Andrade, H. (1996). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership.
  • Goodrich Andrade, H. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education, 4 (4). http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4/number4/
  • Goodrich Andrade, H. y Boulay, B. A. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. Journal of Educational Research, 97 (1), 21-34.
  • Goodrich, H.W. (1996). Student self-assessment: At the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment. (57), ProQuest Information y Learning, US.
  • Green, R. y Bowser, M. (2006). Observations from the field: Sharing a literature review rubric. Journal of Library Administration, 45 (1), 185202. doi: 10.1300/J111v45n01_10
  • Grofle, C.S. y Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? Learning and Instruction, 17 (6), 612-634. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.008
  • Hafner, O.C., y Hafner, P. (2003). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (12), 1509-1528. doi: 10.1080/0950069022000038268
  • Jonsson, A. y Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130-144.
  • Kitsantas, A., Reiser, R.A. y Doster, J. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: Goal setting, self-evaluation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72 (4), 269-287.
  • Kollar, I., Fischer, F. y Slotta, J.D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17 (6), 708-721. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021
  • Kostons, D., Van Gog, T. y Paas, F. (2009). How do I do? Investigating effects of expertise and performance-process records on selfassessment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23 (9), 1256-1265. doi: 10.1002/acp.1528
  • Kramarski, B. y Dudai, V. (2009). Groupmetacognitive support for online inquiry in mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40 (4), 377-404.
  • Kramarski, B. y Michalsky, T. (2009). Three metacognitive approaches to training preservice teachers in different learning phases of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 15 (5), 465 485.
  • Kramarski, B. y Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20 (5), 434-447. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
  • Revista de Investigación en Educación. ISSN: 1697‐5200 / eISSN 2172‐3427 | 196
  • Kramarski, B. y Zeichner, O. (2001). Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Educational Media International, 38 (2), 77-82.
  • Kruger, J. y Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated selfassessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6), 1121-1134.
  • Landrum, R.E. (1999). Student expectations of grade inflation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32 (2), 124-128.
  • Lejk, M. y Wyvill, M. (2001). The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 26 (6), 551-561.
  • McCormick, M.J., Dooley, K.E., Lindner, J.R. y Cummins, R.L. (2007). Perceived growth versus actual growth in executive leadership competencies: An application of the stair-step behaviorally anchored evaluation approach. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48 (2), 2335.
  • McDonald, B. y Boud, D. (2003). The impact of selfassessment on achievement: The effects of selfassessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10 (2), 209-220.
  • Montague, M. (2007). Self-regulation and mathematics instruction. Learning disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (1), 75-83.
  • Nicol, D. y McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning, a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
  • Noonan, B. y Duncan, C.R. (2005). Peer and selfassessment in high schools. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10 (17). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10yn=17
  • Panadero, E. (2011). Instructional help for selfassessment and self-regulation: Evaluation of the efficacy of self-assessment scripts vs. rubrics. (Tesis), Departamento de Psicología Básica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España.
  • Panadero, E. y Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9 (0), 129-144. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
  • Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J. y Huertas, J.A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and selfefficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22 (6), 806-813. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
  • Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J. y Huertas, J.A. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: Effects on first year university students’ selfregulation and performance. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37 (1).
  • Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J. y Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39 (3), 125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001
  • Petkov, D. y Petkova, O. (2006). Development of scoring rubrics for IS projects as an assessment tool. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3, 499-510.
  • Reddy, Y.M. (2007). Effects of rubrics on enhancement of student learning. Educate, 7 (1), 3-17.
  • Reitmeier, C.A., y Vrchota, D.A. (2009). Selfassessment of oral communication presentations in food science and nutrition. Journal of Food Science Education, 8 (4), 8892.
  • Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 15 (8). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15yn=8
  • Sadler, P.M. y Good, E. (2006). The impact of selfand peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11 (1), 1-31.
  • Schafer, W.D., Swanson, G., Bené, N. y Newberry, G. (2001). Effects of teacher knowledge of rubrics on student achievement in four content areas. Applied Measurement in Education, 14 (2), 151-170.
  • Schamber, J.F. y Mahoney, S.L. (2006). Assessing and improving the quality of group critical thinking exhibited in the final projects of collaborative learning groups. The Journal of General Education, 55 (2), 103-137. doi: 10.1353/jge.2006.0025
  • Schworn, S. y Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (2), 285-296. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.285
  • Simon, M. y Forgette-Giroux, R. (2001). A rubric for scoring postsecondary academic skills. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 7 (18). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7yn=18
  • Tan, K.H.K. (2012). Student self-assessment. Assessment, learning and empowerment. Singapore: Research Publishing.
  • Taras, M. (2008). Issues of power and equity in two models of self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 13 (1), 81-92. doi: 10.1080/13562510701794076
  • Taras, M. (2010). Student self-assessment: Processes and consequences. Teaching in Higher Education, 15 (2), 199-209. doi: 10.1080/13562511003620027
  • Thillmann, H., Kunsting, J., Wirth, J. y Leutner, D. (2009). Is it merely a question of "What" to prompt or also "When" to prompt? The role of point of presentation time of prompts in self regulated learning. Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie, 23 (2), 105-115. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.105
  • Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Merriënboer, J.J.G. y Van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551-567.
  • Ward, M., Gruppen, L. y Regehr, G. (2002). Measuring self-assessment: Current state of the art. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7 (1), 63-81.
  • Winne, P.H., y Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky y A. Graesser (Eds.). Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Winne, P.H., y Jamieson-Noel, D. (2003). Selfregulating studying by objectives for learning: Students' reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28 (3), 259-276.
  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. En M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich y M. Zeidner (Eds.). Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-40). San Diego, California: Academic Press