Effects of self-assessment scripts on self-regulation and learning

  1. Alonso Tapia, Jesús
  2. Panadero, Ernesto
Revista:
Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

ISSN: 0210-3702 1578-4126

Año de publicación: 2010

Volumen: 33

Número: 3

Páginas: 385-398

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1174/021037010792215145 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Información de financiación

Acknowledgments: This work was carried out as part of the project “Motivation, assessment and self-regulation” financed by the Spanish Ministry of Education. Author’s Address: Jesús Alonso-Tapia. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología. Departamento de Psi-cología Biológica y de la Salud. Campus de Cantoblanco, c/ Iván Pavlov, 6, despacho 24. 28049 Madrid. E-mail: Jesus.alonso@uam.es - ernesto.panadero@gmail.com

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALONSO-TAPIA, J. (2005). Motives, expectancies and value-interests related to learning: The MEVA questionnaire. Psicothema, 17 (3), 404-411.
  • ALONSO-TAPIA, J. & FERNÁNDEZ, B. (2008). Development and initial validation of the classroom motivational climate questionnaire (CMCQ). Psicothema, 20 (4), 883-889.
  • ALONSO-TAPIA, J. & PARDO, A. (2006). Assessment of learning environment motivational quality from the point of view of secondary and high school learners. Learning & Instruction, 16, 1-15.
  • ANDRADE, H. & DU, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical assessment, research and evaluation 10 (3). Available: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=3
  • ANDRADE, H., DU, Y., & WANG, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students' writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27 (2), 3-13.
  • ANDRADE, H., WANG, X., DU, Y., & AKAWI, R. (in press). Rubric-referenced assessment and self-efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research.
  • BEREITER, C., & SCARDAMALIA, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  • BERTHOLD, K., NUCKLES, M., & RENKL, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564-577.
  • BLACK, P. & WILIAM, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7-74.
  • BOEKAERTS, M., & CORNO, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International 918 Review, 54 (2), 199-231.
  • DIGNATH, C., BUETTNER, G. & LANGFELDT, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? Educational Research Review, 3, 101-129.
  • ELLIOT, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of achievement goal construct. In A.J. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. (pp. 52-72). New York: Guilford.
  • FALCHIKOV, N. & BOUD, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59 (4), 395-430.
  • GREENE, J. & AZEVEDO, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77 (3), 334-372.
  • JONSSON, A. & SVINGBY, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130-144.
  • KITSANTAS, A., REISER, R. A. & DOSTER, J. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: goal setting, self-evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72 (4), 269-287.
  • KOLLAR, I., FISCHER, F., & SLOTTA, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 708-721.
  • LEJK, M. & WYVILL, M. (2001). The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (6), 551-561.
  • MONTAGUE, M. (2007). Self-regulation and mathematics instruction. Learning disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (1), 75-83.
  • PARDO, A. & ALONSO-TAPIA, J. (1992). Estrategias para el cambio motivacional. In J. Alonso-Tapia (Ed.), Motivar en la adolescencia (pp. 331-377). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma.
  • SADLER, P. M. & GOOD, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational assessment, 11 (1), 1-31.
  • SCHAFER, W., SWANSON, G., BENÉ, N., & NEWBERRY, G. (2001). Effects of teacher knowledge of rubrics on student achievement in four content areas. Applied Measurement in Education, 14 (2), 151-170.
  • SCHUNK, D. H. & ZIMMERMAN, B. J. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning. New York: Erlbaum.
  • URDAN, T., & TURNER, J. C. (2007). Competence motivation in the classroom. In A. Elliot, & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 297-317). New York: Guilford.
  • VAN DEN BOOM, G., PAAS, F., VAN MERRIËNBOER, J. J. G. & VAN GOG, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students' self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551-567.
  • ZIMMERMAN, B. J., BANDURA, A. & MARTÍNEZ-PONS, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academia attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Education Research Journal, 29, 663-676.
  • ZIMMERMAN, B. J., & CAMPILLO, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of problem solving (pp. 233-262). New York: Cambridge.
  • ZIMMERMAN, B. J., & KITSANTAS, A. (2005). The Hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-Regulated Learning and Practice. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 509-526). New York: Guilford.