Evidenciar la violencia estatal y corporativa hacia los ecosistemas a través de la arquitectura forense digital

  1. Gema Varona
Revista:
Boletín criminológico

ISSN: 2254-2043,  1137-2427

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 30

Número: 245

Páginas: 1-26

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24310/BC.30.2024.20697 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Boletín criminológico

Resumen

This descriptive article starts considering the relationship between green criminology and criminalistics to address the work of the agency Forensic Arquitecture. It examines the cases of environmental violence that this agency has dealt with so far in order to highlight the potential and limitations of its ap-proach in line with a public criminology. In particular, it highlights the relevance of visualizing and recreating the phenome-nology of various environmental harms and their impact, navigating between activism, art, science and technology. It ends with some notes on the possibility of refocusing its work as a way to give voice to the interdependence of human and non-human life in restorative pro-cesses. This topic has been chosen to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the Criminological Bulletin because it re-flects a common ground for an interdisci-plinary and applied criminology, attentive to serious forms of victimization tradi-tionally neglected, and which must be approached from different perspectives.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ANSTETT, E. y DREYFUS J.-M. (eds.). (2015): Human Remains and Identification: Mass Violence, Genocide and the “Forensic Turn.”. Manchester
  • University Press.
  • ARENAS, L. (2023): “El vertido ilegal de residuos sólidos: un estudio de caso”. En Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 21(2), e820. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v21i2.820.
  • ASHAWA, M., MANSOUR, A., RILEY, J., OSAMOR, J. y OWOH, N. P. (2024): “Digital Forensics Challenges in Cyberspace: Overcoming Legitimacy and Privacy Issues Through Modularisation”. En Cloud Computing and Data Science, 140-156. Disponible en: https://ojs.wiserpub.com/index.php/CCDS/article/view/3845.
  • BURNS, R. (2023): “From meaning to ecocide: The value of phenomenology for green criminology”. En Critical Criminology, 31, 1.137-1.154. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-023-09730-8.
  • COHEN, S. (2013): States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. John Wiley & Sons.
  • CUELLAR, J. M. (2024, en prensa): “Devolver a la víctima su camino: Un ejercicio reconstructivo del “iter victimae” desde la victimología y la ciencia forense”. En Revista de Victimología/Journal of Victimology, 18.
  • CURRY, A. (2017): “The rise of Forensic Architecture”. En Architect, https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/culture/the-rise-of-forensic-architecture_o.
  • DÁVILA, S. E. (2018): “Sobre Eyal Weizman, Arquitectura Forense. Violencia en el Umbral de la Detectabilidad, Nueva York: Zone Books”. En Academia XXII, 9 (18), 191-196.
  • DZIUBAN, Z. (2017): Mapping the ‘Forensic Turn’: Engagements with Materialities of Mass Death in Holocaust Studies and Beyond. New Academic Press.
  • FISHER, B. A., TILSTONE, W. J. y WOYTOWICZ, C. (2009). Introduction to criminalistics: the foundation of forensic science. Academic Press.
  • FORENSIC ARCHITECTURE. (2021): Forensic Architecture: About-Agency, https://forensic-architecture.org/about/agency
  • GALLANTI, F. (2019): Forensic Arquitecture. En AGNEW, V., LAMB, J. y TOMANN, J. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies: Key Terms in the Field. Routledge.
  • GARCÍA-RUIZ, A. y MORELLE-HUNGRÍA, E. (2023): Criminología verde. Criminalidad y daños ecológicos. Civitas.
  • GORDILLO, G. (2015): “Empire on trial: the forensic appearance of truth”. En Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(2), 382-388. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1068/d3302re.
  • GUTIÉRREZ, M. (2018a): Data Activism and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • GUTIÉRREZ, M. (2018b): “Maputopias: cartographies of knowledge, communication and action in the big data society – The cases of Ushahidi and InfoAmazonia”. En GeoJournal 84 (1), 101-120. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9853-8.
  • GUTIÉRREZ, M. (2023): “Data activism and meta-documentary in six films by Forensic Architecture”. En Studies in Documentary Film, 17 (1), 32–52. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2021.1908932.
  • HALL, M. (2014): “The roles and use of law in green criminology”. En International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3 (2), 96-109.
  • HARST, J. (2023): “Virtuelle Investigationen. Transformationen des Indizienparadigmas zwischen Sherlock Holmes und Forensic Architecture”. En Medienkomparatistik, 4, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783849818883.
  • JOHNS, D. (2021): “Forensic Architecture: The whole truth?”. En Millennium Film Journal, (74), 42-48.
  • LAM, A., SOUTH, N. y BRISMAN, A. (2024): “Green cultural criminology: Foundations, variations and new frames”. En Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.749.
  • LAMPKIN, J. A. y WYATT, T. (2023): “An astro-green criminological examination of orbital space debris”. En Criminology & Criminal Justice. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231169124.
  • LOADER, I. y SPARKS, R. (2013): Public criminology? Routledge.
  • MACBEATH, A y WHITFORT, A. (2024): Species victim impact statements. Giving a voice to the unheard victims of environmental crime. Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime.
  • MÄKELÄ, T., HUHTALA, S., LINDQVIST, M. A. y BUCHT, R. (2023): “The current status of environmental forensic science in the member institutes
  • of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI)”. En Forensic Science International, 348. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111593.
  • MANDOLESSI, S. (2021): “Challenging the placeless imaginary in digital memories: The performation of place in the work of Forensic Architecture”. Memory Studies, 14 (3), 622-633. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980211010922.
  • MANSILLA SEPÚLVEDA, J. G., BILLEKE, C. A. H., SOTO ARANGO, D.E., BELTRÁN VÉLIZ, J. C. y VALLE DE FRUTOS, S. (2021): Historia y violencia: Asesinatos de líderes indígenas guardianes del medio ambiente en América Latina, 2016-2019. Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana Y Caribeña
  • (HALAC). En Revista De La Solcha, 11(2), 43–69. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.32991/2237-2717.2021v11i2.p43-69.
  • MARTEACHE, N. (2023): “Editorial número especial. Criminología verde”. En Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 21 (2), e910. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v21i2.910.
  • MARTÍN BERISTAIN, C. (2007): El derecho a la reparación en los conflictos socioambientales. Hegoa.
  • MARTÍN BERISTAIN, C. (2024): Enomeme Gopokimoni. Informe sobre una perspectiva psicosocial y comunitaria del cumplimiento de la decisión de la consulta ciudadana y dictamen de la Corte Constitucional sobre el cierre de las explotaciones del ITT en el Parque Yasuni. Acción Ecológica.
  • MARTÍN BERISTAIN, C., PÁEZ, D. y FERNÁNDEZ, I. (2009): Las palabras de la selva: Estudio psicosocial del impacto de las explotaciones petroleras de Texaco en las comunidades amazónicas de Ecuador. Hegoa.
  • MATCZAK, A. (2024): “Who is ‘the public’when we talk about crime?: Interpreting and framing public voices in criminology”. En STOCKDALE, K.J. y ADDISON, M. (eds.) Marginalised Voices in Criminology. Routledge.
  • MCCLANAHAN, B. y SOUTH, N. (2020): “All knowledge begins with the senses’: Towards a sensory criminology”. The British journal of criminology, 60 (1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz052.
  • MCKEE, Y. y MCLAGAN, M. (2012): “Forensic Architecture: An Interview with Eyal Weizman”. En McLagan M. y McKee, Y. (eds.) Sensible Politics: The Visual Culture of Nongovernmental Politics. Zone Books.
  • MOON, C. (2012): “Interpreters of the dead: Forensic knowledge, human remains and the politics of the past”. En Social and Legal Studies, 22 (2), 149-169. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639124637.
  • MOORE, R. (2018): “Forensic Architecture: Detail behind the Devilry”. En The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/feb/25/forensicarchitects-eyal-weizman.
  • NIETO, A. y CALVO, R. (2023): Justicia restaurativa empresarial. Un modelo para armar. Reus.
  • PELLUCHON, C. (2022): Reparemos el mundo: Humanos, animales, naturaleza. Ned Ediciones.
  • PERUGINI, N. y GORDON, N. (2017): “Distinction and the ethics of violence: On the legal construction of liminal subjects and spaces”. En Antipode, 49 (5), 1.385-1405. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12343.
  • PILKEY, O. H., PILKEY, C. O., PILKEY-JARVIS, L. P., LONGO, N. J., PILKEY, K. C., DODSON, F. B. y HAYES, H. L. (2024): Escaping Nature. How to Survive Global Climate Change. Duke University Press.
  • RAGHAVAN, S., CLARK, A. y MOHAY, G. (2009): “FIA: An open forensic integration architecture for composing digital evidence”. En Sorell, M. (ed.) Forensics in Telecommunications, Information and Multimedia. e-Forensics 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. Springer. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02312-5_10.
  • RODRÍGUEZ MANZANERA, L. (1985): Iter criminis o iter victimae. Porrúa.
  • ROMEO, F. (2024): “Forensic Architecture and the aesthetics of post-human testimony”. En Digital Journalism, 1-18. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2306216.
  • SIMPSON, V. (2018): Meet Forensic Architecture — The first “architectural detective agency. Design Curial (blog), http://www.designcurial.com/news/meetforensic-architecture-6725606/.
  • SOUTH, N. (2014): “Green criminology: Reflections, connections, horizons”. En International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3 (2), 5-20.
  • ULRICH, C. (2018). “Forensic architecture: Digital citizen intelligence in the age of urban warfare”. PolisReflects, 1 (1), 28-39.
  • UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER. (2022): Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source
  • Investigations. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner.
  • VARONA, G. (2020): Victimidad y violencia medioambiental y contra los animales: Retos de la Victimología verde. Comares.
  • VARONA, G. (2024): Justicia restaurativa medioambiental y animal. Guía de aprendizaje y acción a través de la narración de casos. Dykinson.
  • VILLA, C., LYNNERUP, N. y JACOBSEN, C. (2023): “A virtual, 3D multimodal approach to victim and crime scene reconstruction”. En Diagnostics, 13 (17), 2764. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13172764.
  • WATSON, R. (2021): Study: The architecture of forensics. Nonsite.org, 2 de agosto, https://nonsite.org/study-the-forensics-of-architecture/.
  • WEIZMAN, E. (2014): “Matter against memory.” En Sturdy Colls, C. (ed.) Forensis. Sternberg Press.
  • WEIZMAN, E. (2017): Forensic architecture: Violence at the threshold of detectability. Zone Books.
  • WEIZMAN, E. (2018): “Forensic architecture. Interview by Linsey Young”. En Turner Prize, 18, 9-28.
  • WEIZMAN, E. (2019): “Open verification”. En E-Flux Architecture (blog), https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/becoming-digital/248062/open-verification/.
  • WELZ, C. (2016): “Trauma, memory, testimony: phenomenological, psychological, and ethical perspectives”. En Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 27, 104-133. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.66571.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet