Design-Based ResearchSome Challenges and Insights

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anderson, T. y Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress. Educational Psychologist, (4), 39. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
• Ametller, J., Leach, J. y Scott, P. (2007). Using perspectives on subject learning to inform the design of subject teaching: an example from science education. The curriculum journal, 18(4), 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170701687928
• Artigue, M. (1994). Didactical engineering as a framework for the conception of teaching products. Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline, 13, 27-39.
• Barab, S. y Squire, K. (2004) Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R. y Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
• Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. En E. Scanlon y T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
• Collins, A., Joseph, D. y Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
• Dai, D. Y. (2012). Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning. Routledge.
• Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S. y Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
• Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 105–114.
• Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
• diSessa, A. y Cobb, P. (2004) Ontological Innovation and the Role of Theory in Design Experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
• Easterday M., Rees Lewis D. y Gerbe E., (2014). Design-based research process: Problems, phases, and applications. En J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O’Connor, T. Lee y L. D’Amico (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference of Learning Sciences (pp. 317–324), International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO.
• Eflin, J. T., Glennan, S. y Reisch, G. (1999). The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of research in science teaching, 36(1), 107.
• Eisenhart, M. A. y Howe, K. R. (1992). Validity in educational research. En M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy y J. Preissle (Eds.), The Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 307-324). San Diego: Academic Press.
• Engeström, Y. (2008). From design experiments to formative interventions (keynote). In International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, NL.
• Kelly A.E. (2004) Design Research in Education: Yes, but is it Methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
• Kelly, A. E. (2014). Design-based research in engineering education: Current state and next steps. En A. Johri y B. M. Olds (Eds.). Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. (pp 497-517). Cambridge University Press.
• Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A. y Baek, J. Y. (2014). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Kolodner, J.L. (2004). Design-based research: Clarifying the terms. Special issue: Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1).
• Kortland K. y Klaassen K. (2010). Designing theory-based teaching-learning sequences for science education: Proceedings of the symposium in honour of Piet Lijnse at the time of his retirement as professor of physics didactics at Utrecht University, Utrecht, Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education
• Gil, D. y Martínez-Torregrosa, J. (1987). Los programas-guía de actividades: una concreción del modelo constructivista de aprendizaje de las ciencias. Investigación en la Escuela, 3, 3-12.
• Guisasola J. y Oliva J.M. (2020) Nueva sección despecial de REurEDC sobre investigaciónbasada en el diseño de secuencias de enseñanza. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 17(3), 3001. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2020.v17.i3.3001
• Guisasola, J., Ametller, J. y Zuza, K. (2021). Investigación basada en el diseño de Secuencias de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje: una línea de investigación emergente en Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 18(1). http://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i1.1801
• Guisasola, J., Zuza, K., Sarriugarte, P., y Ametller, J. (2023). Design Based Teaching-Learning Sequences in Physics Education: A Rising Line of Research. En Thasar y Heron (Eds.). International Handbook of Physics Education Research (pp. 1-26). AIP Publishing.
• Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_2
• Jimenez-Liso, M. R., Bellocchi, A., Martinez-Chico, M. y Lopez-Gay, R. (2022). A model-based inquiry sequence as a heuristic to evaluate students’ emotional, behavioral, and cognitive engagement. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1313-1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10010-0
• Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values. Berkely, CA: University of California Press
• Leach, J. y Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education 38(1), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560189
• Martínez-Torregrosa, J., Limiñana, R., Menargues, A. y Colomer, R. (2018). In-depth teaching as oriented-research about seasons and the sun/earth model: effects on content knowledge attained by preservice primary teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 97-119. http://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.97
• Maxwell, J.A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002003
• McDermott, L. C. y Shaffer, P. S. (2002). Tutorials in introductory physics (pp. 1-245). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• McKenney, S. y Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based re- search progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463781
• Middleton, J., Gorard, S., Taylor, C. y Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008). The “compleat” design experiment: From soup to nuts. En A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh y J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Phillips, D. C. y Dolle, J. R. (2006). From Plato to Brown and beyond: Theory, practice, and the promise of design experiments. En L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts y S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends: Sixteen essays in honour of Erik DeCorte (pp. 277–293). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier
• Pickering, A. (1984) Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
• Psillos D. y Kariotoglou P. (2016,). Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences, Springer.
• Sandoval, W. A. (2013). Educational design research in the 21st century. En Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 388-396)
• Sandoval, W. A. y Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context [Special issue]. Educational Psychologist, 39(4).
• Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L. y Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the Science of Education Design Studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001025
• Slezak, C., Koenig, K. M., Endorf, R. J. y Braun, G. A. (2011). Investigating the effectiveness of the tutorials in introductory physics in multiple instructional settings. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 7(2), 020116.
• Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. y Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. London, England: Routledge
• Zuza, K., Sarriugarte, P., Ametller, J., Heron, P. R. y Guisasola, J. (2020). Towards a research program in designing and evaluating teaching materials: An example from dc resistive circuits in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020149. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020149