Adineko pertsonekin estrategia lagunkoiak garatzeko kosorkuntza eta koprodukzio-ekimenak aztertuzEuskal Autonomia Erkidegoko hiru hiriburuetatik ikasten

  1. Martin Zuniga Ruiz de Loizaga 1
  2. Tine Buffel 2
  3. Felix Arrieta Frutos 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

  2. 2 University of Manchester
    info

    University of Manchester

    Mánchester, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/027m9bs27

Aldizkaria:
Zerbitzuan: Gizarte zerbitzuetarako aldizkaria = Revista de servicios sociales

ISSN: 1134-7147

Argitalpen urtea: 2024

Zenbakia: 82

Orrialdeak: 35-46

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Zerbitzuan: Gizarte zerbitzuetarako aldizkaria = Revista de servicios sociales

Laburpena

Euskal Autonomia Erkidegoan gertatzen ari den zahartze-prozesuak bultzatuta, Pertsona Adinduekin Hiri eta Komunitate Lagunkoiak ekimena lehen-mailako erreferente politiko bihurtu da lurraldean zahartze-politikak garatzeko. Artikulu honek azterketa kualitatibo baten bitartez aztertzen du nola autonomia erkidegoko hiru hiriburuak adineko pertsonen aldeko estrategiak ezartzen ari diren, kosorkuntza- eta koprodukzio- prozesuei begira. Parte hartzeko prozesu horien garapenean gaur egun dituzten erronkak aztertzen ditu artikuluak. Gure ikerketak iradokitzen du inplikazio politikoak, beharrezkoa bada ere, ez duela zentzurik, baldin eta estrategia alderdi interesdun garrantzitsuenen lanean integratzen ez bada. Gainera, adinekoak gehiago errespetatzeko orduan komunitateek duten arrakasta, neurri handi batean, pertsona adinduak, gizarte-bazterkeriari aurre egin behar diotenak barne, etorkizuneko ikerkuntzan eta politiketan funtsezko eragile gisa parte hartzen duten ala ez, adinekoak errespetatzen dituzten garapenen inguruan

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • ARRIETA, F. (2019): El archipiélago del bienestar: el sistema de servicios sociales en el País Vasco, Madril, Catarata.
  • BEEBEEJAUN, Y.; DUROSE, C.; REES, J.; RICHARDSON, J. eta RICHARDSON, L. (2014): “‘Beyond text’: exploring ethos and method in coproducing research with communities”, Community Development Journal, 49. bol., 1. zb., 37.-53. or.
  • BELL, D. eta PAHL, K. (2018): “Co-production: towards a utopian approach’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21. bol., 1. zb., 105.-117. or.
  • BOVAIRD, T. (2007): “Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services”, Public Administration Review, 67. bol., 5. zb., 846.-860. or.
  • BOVAIRD, T.; VAN RYZIN, G.; LOEFflER, E. eta PARRADO, S. (2015): “Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services”, Journal of Social Policy, 44. bol., 1. zb., 1.-23. or.
  • BRANDSEN, T. eta HONINGH, M. (2015): “Distinguishing different types of coproduction: a conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions”, Public Administration Review, 76. bol., 427.-435. or.
  • BUFFEL, T. (ed.) (2015): Researching age-friendly communities. stories from older people as coinvestigators, Manchester, The University of Manchester Library.
  • BUFFEL, T. (ed.) (2018a): “Older coresearchers exploring age-friendly communities: an ‘insider’ perspective on the benefits and challenges of peer-research”, The Gerontologist, 59. bol., 3. zb., 1.-11. or.
  • BUFFEL, T. (ed.) (2018b): “Social research and co-production with older people: developing age-friendly communities”, Journal of Aging Studies, 44. bol., 52.-60. or.
  • BUFFEL, T.; HANDLER, S. eta PHILLIPSON, C. (2018): Age-friendly cities and communities: a global perspective, Bristol, Policy Press.
  • BUFFEL, T. eta PHILLIPSON, C. (2016): “Can global cities be ‘age-friendly cities’? Urban development and ageing populations”, Cities, 55. bol., 94.-100. or.
  • BUFFEL, T.; PHILLIPSON, C. eta RÉMILLARD-BOILARD, S. (2019): “Age-friendly cities and communities: new directions for research and policy”, in GU, D. eta DUPRE, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging, Cham, Springer.
  • BURGESS, G. eta DURRANT, D. (2019): “Reciprocity in the co-production of public services: the role of volunteering through community time exchange”, Social Policy and Society, 18. bol., 2. zb., 171.-186. or.
  • CARRASCO, C. (2013): “El cuidado como eje vertebrador de una nueva economía”, Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 31. bol., 1. zb., 39.-56. or.
  • CHOWDHURY, M.F. (2015): “Coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data analysis: debates and discussion”, Quality and Quantity, 49. bol., 1.135.-1.143. or.
  • COMAS-D’ARGEMIR, D. (2015): “Los cuidados de larga duración y el cuarto pilar del sistema de bienestar”, Revista de Antropología Social, 24. bol., 375.-404. or.
  • CRAIG, G. (2004): “Citizenship, exclusion and older people”, Journal of Social Policy, 33. bol., 1. zb., 95.-114. or.
  • DE LOS SANTOS A., P.V. eta CARMONA VALDÉS, S.E. (2012): “Cuidado informal: una mirada desde la perspectiva de género”, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Familia, 4. bol., 138.-146. or.
  • DEL BARRIO, E.; MARSILLAS, S.; BUFFEL, T.; SMETCOREN, A. eta SANCHO, M. (2018): “From active aging to active citizenship: the role of (age) friendliness”, Social Sciences, 7. bol., 8. zb., 134.
  • DORAN, P. eta BUFFEL, T. (2018): “Translating research into action: involving older people in co-producing knowledge about age-friendly neighbourhood interventions”, Working with Older People, 22. bol., 1. zb., 39.-47. or.
  • DURÁN, M.Á. (2017): “Ciudades que cuidan”, in NIEVES, M. eta SEGOVIA, O. (ed.), ¿Quién cuida en la ciudad? Aportes para políticas urbanas de igualdad, Santiago de Chile, CEPAL, 91.-116. or.
  • EIN (2017): [EINen webgunetik ateratako datuak], [accessed 2020-1- 17an kontsultaturik].
  • EIN (2019): [EINen webgunetik ateratako datuak], [2020-1-17an kontsultaturik].
  • EIN (2020): “Encuesta de Población Activa 2020”.
  • ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. eta PALIER, B. (2011): Los Tres grandes retos del estado de bienestar, Bartzelona, Ariel.
  • EUSTAT (2019): “Indicadores demográficos 2017” [prentsaoharra], Gasteiz, Euskal Estatistika Erakundea, 2019-4-5ean, [2021-5-26an kontsultaturik].
  • FLEMIG, S. eta OSBORNE, S. (2019): “The dynamics of co-production in the context of social care personalisation: testing theory and practice in a Scottish context”, Journal of Social Policy, 48. bol., 4. zb., 671.-697. or.
  • HAFFORD-LETCHFIELD, T. (2019): “Participation and co-production in the care and support of older people”, in GU, D. eta DUPRE, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging, Cham, Springer.
  • HUGHES, T. (2014): “Co-creation: moving towards a framework for creating innovation in the triple helix”, Prometheus, 32. bol., 4. zb., 337.-350. or.
  • KANO, M.; ROSENBERG, P. eta DALTON, S. (2018): “A global pilot study of age-friendly city indicators”, Social Indicators Research, 138. bol., 1.205.-1.227. or.
  • KEY, W. eta CULLINEY, M. (2018): “The oldest old and the risk of social exclusion”, Social Policy and Society, 17. bol., 1. zb., 47.-63. or.
  • LAWLER, K. (2015): “Age-friendly communities: go big or go home”, Public Policy and Aging Report, 25. bol., 30.-33. or.
  • LITTLECHILD, R.; TANNER, D. eta HALL, K. (2015): “Coresearch with older people: perspectives on impact”, Qualitative Social Work, 14. bol., 1. zb., 18.-35. or.
  • MCDONALD, B.; SCHARF, T. eta WALSH, K. (2019): “Creating an age-friendly county in Ireland: stakeholders’ perspectives on implementation”, in BUFFEL, T.; HANDLER, S. eta PHILLIPSON, C. (ed.), Age friendly cities and communities. A global perspective, Bristol, Policy Press, 143.-166. or.
  • OME (2018): La Red Mundial de Ciudades y Comunidades Adaptadas a las Personas Mayores: revisar el último decenio y mirar con optimismo hacia el siguiente, Geneva, Osasunaren Mundu Erakundeak.
  • MORENO, L. (2012): La Europa asocial, Bartzelona, Península.
  • MOULAERT, T. eta GARON, S. (ed.) (2016): Age-friendly cities and communities in international comparison, Cham, Springer.
  • NIEBOER, A. eta CRAMM, J. (2018): “Age-friendly communities matter for older people’s wellbeing”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 19. bol., 2.405-2.420. or.
  • NOVO, A. (2010): La excepcionalidad del modelo federal foral vasco, Valentzia, Tirant lo Blanch.
  • OSBORNE, S. (2018): “From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation?”, Public Management Review, 20. bol., 2. zb., 225.-231. or.
  • PAVOLINI, E.; LEÓN, M.; GUILLÉN, A. eta ASCOLI, U. (2015): “From austerity to permanent strain? The EU and welfare state reform in Italy and Spain”, Comparative European Politics, 13. bol., 56.-76. or.
  • PÉREZ OROZCO, A. (2006): “Amenaza tormenta: la crisis de los cuidados y la reorganización del sistema económico”, Revista de Economía Crítica, 5. bol., 7.-37. or.
  • PESTOFF, V. (2011): “Co-produção, nova governança pública e serviços sociais no terceiro setor na Europa”, Ciências Sociais Unisinos, 47. bol., 1. zb., 15.-24. or.
  • POOCHAROEN, O. eta TING, B. (2015): “Collaboration, co-production, networks: convergence of theories”, Public Management Review, 17. bol., 4. zb., 587.-614. or.
  • RÉMILLARD-BOILARD, S. (2018): “The UK network of age-friendly communities: a general review”, Working with Older People, 22. bol., 1. zb., 30.-38. or.
  • SCHARLACH, A.; DAVITT, J.; LEHNING, A.J.; GREEFIELD, E.A. eta GRAHAM, C.L. (2014): “Does the village model help to foster age-friendly communities?”, Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 26. bol., 1.-2. zb., 181.-196. or.
  • SELLONI, D. (2017): Codesign for public-interest services, Cham, Springer
  • SMETCOREN, A.; DE WONDER, L.; DUPPEN, D.; DE WITTE, N.; VANMECHELEN, O. eta VERTÉ, D. (2019): “Towards an ‘active caring community’”, in BUFFEL, T.; HANDLER, S. eta PHILLIPSON, C. (ed.), Age friendly cities and communities. a global perspective, Bristol, Policy Press, 97.-118. or.
  • WARD, P.; BANKS, S.; HART, A. eta PAHL, K. (2018): “Conclusion: imagining different communities and making them happen”, in BANKS, S.; HART, A.; Pahl, K. eta WARD, P. (ed.), Co-producing research: a community development approach, Bristol, Policy Press, 203.-209. or.
  • ZUNIGA, M.; SALABERRIA, E. eta ARRIETA, F. (2019): “An analysis of the role of communities in care systems co-created with older people”, Public Management Review, 22. bol., 12. zb., 1.799-1.818. or.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet