Relacionalidad frente al biologicismomás allá de la biología determinista y esencialista

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alberch, P. (1982). The generative and regulatory roles of development in evolution. En D. Mossakowski, D. y G. Roth, G. (Eds.), Environmental Adaptation and Evolution: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach (19-35). Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
• Alberch, P. (1989). The logic of monsters: evidence for internal constraint in development and evolution. Geobios, 12, 21–57.
• Arminjon, M. (2016). Birth of the allostatic model: From Cannon’s biocracy to critical physiology. Journal of the History of Biology, 49(2), 397-423.
• Baedke, J., Fábregas-Tejeda, A. & Prieto, G. I. (2021). Unknotting reciprocal causation between organism and environment. Biology & Philosophy 36(5), 1–29.
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801-831.
• Barnes, S. B. & Dupré, J. (2008). Genomes and what to make of them. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Bernard, C. (1865). Introducción al estudio de la Medicina Experimental. Barcelona: Crítica.
• Bich, L. & Etxeberria, A. (2013). Systems, autopoietic. En W. Dubitzky, O. Wolkenhauer, K-H. Cho & H. Yokota (Eds.), Encyclopedia of systems biology (2110–2113). Nueva York: Springer. Recuperado de: https://cepa.info/2314.
• Bonduriansky, R. & Day, T. (2020). Extended Heredity: A New Understanding of Inheritance and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Canguilhem, G. (2008). The Living and Its Milieu. En Knowledge of Life (98-120). Nueva York: Fordham University Press.
• Cortés-García, D. & Etxeberria, A. (2023). Ontologies in evolutionary biology: the role of the organism in the two Syntheses. En J. M. Viejo y M. Sanjuán (Eds.), Life and Mind – New directions in the Philosophy of Biology and Cognitive Sciences (185-205). Nueva York: Springer.
• Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preser-vation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Londres: John Murray.
• Díaz‐León, E. (2015). What is social construction? European Journal of Philosophy, 23(4), 1137-1152.
• Dupré, J. (2010). It Is Not Possible to Reduce Biological Explanations to Explanations in Chemistry and/or Physics. En F. J. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology (32-47). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell Pub.
• Dupré J. & Nicholson, D (2018). A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. En D. J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (3-45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Etxeberria, A. (2019). El sentido de la muerte: vida, biología e inmortalidad. En J. A. Achón (Ed.), Catálogo de la exposición: Ante la muerte (143-161). Donostia: San Telmo Museoa.
• Etxeberria, A. (2020). Regulation, milieu, and norms: Georges Canguilhem’s individual organisms as relations. En P-O. Methot y J. Sholl (Eds.), Vital Norms. Canguilhem’s The Normal and the Pathological in the Twenty-First Century (291-328). París: Hermann.
• Etxeberria, A. & Bich, L. (2017). Auto-organización y autopoiesis. En C. E. Vanney, I. Silva y J. F. Franck (Eds.), Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral.
• Etxeberria, A., Cortés-García, D. & Torres-Aldave, M. (2023). Organisms, Life Relations, and Evolution: Inter-Dependencies after Kropotkin’s Mutual Aid. ArtefaCToS. Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 12(1), 179-204.
• Etxeberria, A. & Moreno, A. (2014). La noción de autonomía en biología: Aportaciones, retos y discusiones. En A. Casado da Rocha (Ed.), Autonomía con otros: Ensayos de Bioética (95–110). Madrid: Plaza y Valdés.
• Etxeberria, A. & Nuño de la Rosa, L. (2021). Pere Alberch (1954-1998). En L. Nuño de la Rosa y G. Müller (Eds.), Evolutionary Developmental Biology – A Reference Guide (339-353). Cham: Springer.
• Etxeberria, A. & Umerez, J. (2006). Organismo y organización en la biología teórica. ¿Vuelta al organicismo? Ludus Vitalis, 14(26), 3–38.
• Gilbert, S. F., Sapp, J. & Tauber, A. I. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals. The Quarterly review of biology, 87(4), 325-341.
• Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Haslanger, S. (2003). Social Construction: the “debunking project”. En F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality (301-325). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Keller, E. F. (2010). It is Possible to Reduce Biological Explanations to Explanations in Chemistry and/or Physics. En F. J. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology (3-19). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Kõiv, R. (2019). Causal Social Construction. Journal of Social Ontology, 5(1), 77-99.
• Kropotkin, P. (2016 [1902]). El apoyo mutuo. Un factor de evolución. Logroño: Pepitas de calabaza.
• Kwa, C. (2002). Romantic and baroque conceptions of complex wholes in the sciences. En J. Law & A. Mole (Eds.), Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices (23-52). Durham & Londres: Duke University Press.
• Laland, K. N., Matthews, B. & Feldman, M. W. (2016). An introduction to niche construction theory. Evol Ecol, 30,191–202.
• Landecker, H. (2017). Metabolism, Autonomy, and Individuality. En S. Lidgard & L. Nyhart (Eds.), Biological Individuality: Integrating Scientific, Philosophical, and Historical Perspectives (225-248). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lewontin, R. (1983). The organism as the subject and object of evolution. Scientia, 118, 65-82.
• Lewontin, R. C. & Levins, R. (2007). Biology under the influence: Dialectical essays on ecology, agriculture, and health. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
• Marques, T. (2017). The relevance of causal social construction. Journal of Social Ontology, 3(1), 1-25.
• Marshall, D. & Weatherson, B. (2023). Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Properties. En E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University.
• Meloni, M. & Testa, G. (2014). Scrutinizing the epigenetics revolution. BioSocieties, 9(4), 431-456.
• Moreno, A., Etxeberria, A. & Umerez, J. (2008). The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models. Biosystems, 91(2), 309–319.
• Moreno, A. & Mossio, M (2015). Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry. Cham: Springer.
• Newman, S. A. (2018) Inherency. En L. Nuño de la Rosa & G. Müller (Eds.), Evolutionary Developmental Biology (121-133). Cham: Springer.
• Nicholson, D. J. (2014). The return of the organism as a fundamental explanatory concept in biology. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 347–359.
• Nyholm, S. V. & McFall-Ngai, M. J. (2014). Animal development in a microbial world. En A. Minelli & T. Pradeu (Eds.), Towards a Theory of Development (260-273). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
• Nuño de la Rosa, L., Pavličev, M. & Etxeberria, A. (2021). Pregnant Females as Historical Individuals: An Insight From the Philosophy of Evo-Devo. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
• Shostak, S. (2013). Exposed science: Genes, the environment, and the politics of population health. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Stotz, K. & Griffiths, P. (2016). Epigenetics: ambiguities and implications. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 38, 22.
• Sultan, S. E. (2015). Organism and environment. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
• Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. North Holland.
• Walsh, D. M. (2015). Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
• Wolfe, C. (2018). Materialismos nuevos y viejos. En M. Palacio (Ed.), Neo-materialismo. La vida humana, la materia viviente y el cosmos (55-69). Prometeo Libros.