Are Brazilian innovation systems innovative? Regional and sectorial decompositions of triple-helix synergies

  1. Almeida, Mariza 1
  2. Porto-Gómez , Igone 2
  3. Leydesdorff, Loet 3
  1. 1 Universidad Federal del Estado de Rio de Janeiro
  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
  3. 3 University of Amsterdam
    info

    University of Amsterdam

    Ámsterdam, Holanda

    ROR https://ror.org/04dkp9463

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: Tribute to Loet Leydesdorff

Volumen: 32

Número: 7

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2023.DIC.07 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Una economía basada en el conocimiento añade la innovación como otra dinámica a una economía política. Mientras que una economía política está institucionalizada -por ejemplo, en un estado nación-, la base de conocimiento es volátil, aunque deja huellas al transformar las capas institucionales. Esta transformación en nuevas opciones puede ser medida como redundancia utilizando el indicador de la Triple Hélice. El equilibrio entre la generación histórica de entropía y la generación basada en el conocimiento de opciones puede ser medido en términos de contribuciones positivas y negativas a la incertidumbre prevaleciente. ¿En qué escala y en qué sectores es evidente la sinergia entre las distribuciones geográficas, tecnológicas y organizativas de las empresas? Utilizando la información mutua en las tres dimensiones como indicador, analizamos un conjunto de datos de más de 16 millones de empresas en Brasil y calculamos la sinergia dentro y entre estados y sectores de este país en términos de bits de información. Los resultados sugieren que no se genera sinergia a nivel nacional. La economía política del país no ha sido (aún) transformada en un sistema nacional de innovación. A nivel estatal, las sinergias varían según los niveles geográficos y los sectores debido a las especificidades de los estados. Se encontraron valores por encima del promedio para algunos estados en las Regiones Sur y Sudeste. Además, la capital política, Brasilia, ha demostrado no tener impacto en el sistema de innovación de Brasil.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albuquerque, Eduardo-da-Motta (2000). “Domestic patents and developing countries: arguments for their study and data from Brazil (1980-1995)”. Research policy, v. 29, n. 9, pp. 1047-1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00053-0
  • Albuquerque, Eduardo-da-Motta; Suzigan, Wilson; Cário, Silvio-Antonio-Ferraz; Fernandes, Ana-Cristina; Shima, Walter; Britto, Jorge; Barcelos, Achyles; Rapini, Márcia-Siqueira (2008). “An investigation on the contribution of universities and research institutes formaturing the Brazilian innovation system: preliminary results”. In: Globelics conference, Mexico City.
  • Altenburg, Tilman (2011). “Building inclusive innovation systems in developing countries: challenges for IS research”. In: Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K. J.; Chaminade, C.; Vang, J. (eds.). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Bureau van Dijk (2018). Orbis database. https://orbis.bvdinfo.com
  • Canuto, Otaviano; Cavallari, Matheus; Reis, José-Guilherme (2013). “Brazilian exports: climbing down a competitiveness cliff”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (6302).
  • Codeplan (Companhia de Planejamento do Distrito Federal) (2020). Produto interno bruto do Distrito Federal 2018. https://www.codeplan.df.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Relatorio-PIB-DF-2018.pdf
  • Edquist, Charles (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (1995). “The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development”. EASST Review, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 11-19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2480085
  • Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”. Research policy, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  • Eurostat/OECD (2011). High technology and knowledge-intensive sectors, December. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/Annexes/htec_esms_an3.pdf
  • Haddad Eduardo A. (1999). Regional inequality and structural changes: lessons from the Brazilian experience. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hartmann, Dominik; Guevara, Miguel R.; Jara-Figueroa, Cristian; Aristarán, Manuel; Hidalgo, César A. (2017). “Linking economic complexity, institutions, and income inequality”. World development, n. 93, pp. 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020
  • IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) (2020). Sistemas de Contas regionais: Brasil: 2018 / IBGE. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101765
  • INPI (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Intelectual) (2021). Ranking dos depositantes residentes. https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br/central-de-conteudo/noticias/inpi-divulga-rankings-dos-maiores-depositantes-em-2020
  • Ishenda, Doris-Kokutungisa; Guoqing, Shi (2019). “Determinants in relocation of capital cities”. Journal of public administration and governance, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 200-220. https://doi.org//10.5296/jpag.v9i4.15983
  • Jaimurzina, Azhar; Pérez-Salas, Gabriel; Sánchez, Ricardo J. (2015). Políticas de logística y movilidad para el desarrollo sostenible y la integración regional. Serie Recursos naturales e infraestructura, n. 174, Cepal, Naciones Unidas. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/39427
  • Laafia, Ibrahim (2002). National and regional employment in high tech and knowledge intensive sectors in the EU ó 1995-2000. Statistics in focus: Science and technology, theme 9, n. 4. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-statistics-in-focus/-/KS-NS-02-003
  • Lengyel, Balázs; Leydesdorff, Loet (2011). “Regional innovation systems in Hungary: the failing synergy at the national level”. Reg. stud, v. 45, n. 5, pp. 677-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003614274
  • Leydesdorff, Loet (1997). “The new communication regime of university-industry-government relations”. In: Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L. (eds.). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Cassell Academic.
  • Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). “The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations”. Research policy, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3
  • Leydesdorff, Loet (2003). “The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: an indicator of the triple helix dynamics” Scientometrics, v. 58, n. 2, pp. 445-467. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026253130577
  • Leydesdorff, Loet (2006). The knowledge-based economy: modelled, measured, simulated. Boca Raton: Universal Publishers. ISBN: 1 58112 937 8
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Cucco, Ivan (2019). “Regions, innovation systems, and the North-South divide in Italy”. El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 2, e280214. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.14
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Dolfsma, Wilfred; Van-der-Panne, Gerben (2006). “Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among ‘technology, organization, and territory’”. Research policy, v. 35, n. 2, pp. 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.001
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Etzkowitz, Henry (1996). “Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”. Science and public policy, v. 23, n. 5, pp. 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/23.5.279
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Fritsch, Michael (2006). “Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics”. Research policy, v. 35, n. 10, pp. 1538-1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.027
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Porto-Gómez, Igone (2019). “Measuring the expected synergy in Spanish regional and national systems of innovation”. The journal of technology transfer, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9618-4
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Strand, Øivind (2013). “The Swedish system of innovation: Regional synergies in a knowledge-based economy”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 9, pp. 1890-1902. htpps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22895
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Sun, Yuan (2009). “National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international co-authorship relations”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 4, pp. 778-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20997
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Wagner, Caroline S.; Porto-Gómez, Igone; Comins, Jordan A.; Phillips, Fred (2019). “Synergy in the knowledge base of U.S. innovation systems at national, state, and regional levels: The contributions of high-tech manufacturing and knowledge-intensive services”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 70, n. 10, pp. 1108-1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24182
  • Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (1999). “National business systems and national systems of innovation”. International studies of management & organization, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1999.11656763
  • Madaleno, Isabel-Maria (1996). “Brasilia: the frontier capital”. Cities, v. 13, n. 4, pp. 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(96)00016-9
  • Morais, Margarida B.; Swart, Julia; Jordaan, Jacob A. (2018). “Economic complexity and inequality: Does productive structure affect regional wage differentials in Brazil?”. USE working paper series, n. 18-11.
  • Nelson, Richard R.; Winter, Sidney G. (1977). “In search of useful theory of innovation”. Research policy, v. 6, n. 1, pp. 35-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4
  • Nelson, Richard R.; Winter, Sidney G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • OECD (2018). Economic surveys: Brazil 2018.
  • Oreiro, José-Luis; Mararin, Luciano-Luiz; Gala, Paulo (2020). “Deindustrialization, economic complexity and exchange rate overvaluation: the case of Brazil (1998-2017)”. PSL quarterly review, v. 73, n. 295, pp. 313-341. https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643_73.295_3
  • Pacheco, Carlos-Américo (2019). “Institutional dimensions of innovation policy in Brazil”. In: Reynolds, E. B.; Schneider, B. R.; Zylberberg, E. (eds.). Innovation in Brazil: Advancing development in the 21st century. New York: Routledge.
  • Park, Han Woo; Hong, Heung-Deug; Leydesdorff, Loet (2005). “A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators” Scientometrics, v. 65, n. 1, pp. 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0257-4
  • Park, Han Woo; Leydesdorff, Loet (2010). “Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives”. Research policy, v. 39, n. 5, pp. 640-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.009
  • Petras, James (2013). “Brazil: Extractive capitalism and the great leap backward”. World review of political economy, v. 4, n. 4, pp. 469-483. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.4.4.0469
  • Sábato, Jorge; Botana, Natalio (1970). “La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina”. Serie Documentos teóricos 11. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima: Perú. http://repositorio.iep.org.pe/bitstream/handle/IEP/1037/Sabato_Botana_ciencia-tecnologia-desarrollo-América-Latina.pdf
  • De-Santana, José-Ricardo; Teixeira, André-Luiz-da-Silva; Rapini, Márcia-Siqueira; Esperidião, Fernanda (2019). “Financiamento público à inovação no Brasil: contribuição para uma distribuição regional mais equilibrada?”. Planejamento e políticas públicas, v. 52, Jan-Jun. http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/9766/1/ppp_n52_financiamento.pdf
  • Strand, Øivind; Leydesdorff, Loet (2013). “Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography”. Technological forecasting & social change, v. 80, n. 3, pp. 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.010
  • Theil, Henri (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis: With applications in the social and administrative sciences. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  • Ulanowicz, Robert E. (1986). Growth and development: Ecosystems phenomenology. New York: Springer.
  • Vecchio, Giovanni; Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio; Hurtubia, Ricardo (2020). “Transport and equity in Latin America: a critical review of socially oriented accessibility assessments”. Transport reviews, v. 40, n. 3, pp. 354-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1711828
  • Whitley, Richard D. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Whitley, Richard D. (2001). National innovation systems. In: Smelser, N. J.; Baltes, P. B. (eds.). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • World Bank (2019). World Bank Group Country Survey, Brazil. https://data.worldbank.org/country/brazil
  • Ye, Fred Y.; Yu, Susan S.; Leydesdorff, Loet (2013). “The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 11, pp. 2317-2325. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22931
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet