How to carry out organisational debriefing for team learning

  1. Melany Hebles 1
  2. Concepcion Yaniz Alvarez de Eulate 2
  3. Lourdes Villardon Gallego 2
  1. 1 Universidad Catolica de la Santısima Concepcion, Chile
  2. 2 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

Revista:
European journal of management and business economics

ISSN: 2444-8494,  2444-8451

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 32

Número: 4

Páginas: 436-451

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1108/EJMBE-08-2022-0264 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: European journal of management and business economics

Resumen

Purpose The debriefing is a procedure based on intra-team feedback, which has frequently been applied in university formation in health but has been less used in business. The aim of this research is to analyse best practices in the actual implementation of debriefing in organisations, based on criteria the guidelines for carrying out each stage established in the procedure. Design/methodology/approach To achieve these goals, working teams from different organisations carried out 19 group-debriefing sessions on an authentic work problem. These sessions were observed and analysed following a qualitative approach. Findings After observing a debriefing session in 19 organisations, four categories related to its implementation have been identified: Self-analysis, information, planning and orientation of the development of the team. Research limitations/implications It is important to mention some limitations to this work. The major limitation was the lack of published literature related to the debriefing in the area of organisational management. The qualitative and exploratory nature of the study limits the generalisation of the results. Practical implications The research has practical implications as the characterisation and description of each phase favours the transfer to implement the debriefing technique adequately in different types of organisations. Social implications It has been observed that all forms of debriefing have a common purpose in learning and, team and employee development, due to the powerful transferability and usefulness of debriefing in different contexts. Therefore, knowing the correct use of debriefing is a breakthrough in this area. In addition, including this type of practice will not just facilitate a better performance, it will also help teams to learn to work in a team from their own experiences. Originality/value It has been characterised by the process of debriefing from the correct implementation of each phase through the analysis of the narratives that arise in the debriefing sessions carried out.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allen, J.A.,Reiter-Palmon,R.,Crowe, J. andScott,C. (2018), “Debriefs: teams learningfromdoingin context”,AmericanPsychologist,Vol. 73,pp. 504-516,doi: 10.1037/amp0000246.
  • Bernal-Conesa, J.A.,Briones-Penalver,A.J. andDeNieves-Nieto, C. (2016), “The integrationofCSR management systems and their influence on the performance of technology companies”, EuropeanJournal ofManagementandBusinessEconomics,Vol.25No.3,pp. 121-132.
  • Bipp,T. andKleingeld,A. (2018), “Subconsciousperformancegoals: investigating themoderating effectofnegativegoal-discrepancyfeedback”,HumanPerformance,Vol.3No.15,pp.255-281
  • . Boon,A.,Raes,E.,Kyndt,E.andDochy,F. (2013),“Teamlearningbeliefsandbehavioursinresponse teams”,EuropeanJournalofTrainingandDevelopment,Vol.37No.4,pp.357-379,doi:10.1108/ 03090591311319771.
  • Bouncken,R.B.,Lapidus,A. andQui,Y. (2022), “Organizational sustainabilityidentity:NewWork’of home offices and coworking spaces as facilitators”, Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship,Vol. 1No.2,100011.
  • Conoscenti,E.,Martucci,G.,Piazza,M.,Tuzzolino, F.,Ragonese,B.,Burgio,G.,Arena,G.,Blot, S., Luca, A., Arcadipane, A. and Chiaramonte, G. (2021), “Post-crisis debriefing: a tool for improvingqualityinthemedicalemergencyteamsystem”, IntensiveandCriticalCareNursing, Vol.63, 102977,doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102977.
  • Draucker, C.B.,Martsolf,D.S.,Ross,R. andRusk,T.B. (2007), “Theoretical samplingandcategory development ingroundedtheory”,QualitativeHealthResearch,Vol. 17No.8,pp.1137-1148.
  • Eddy,E.R.,Tannenbaum,S.I.andMathieu, J.E. (2013),“Helpingteamstohelpthemselves:comparing twoteam-leddebriefingmethods”,PersonnelPsychology,Vol. 66No.4,pp. 975-1008.
  • Fernando, Y. andWulansari, P. (2020), “Perceived understanding of supply chain integration, communicationandteamworkcompetencyintheglobalmanufacturingcompanies”,European Journal ofManagement andBusinessEconomics, Vol. 30No. 2, pp. 191-210, doi: 10.1108/ EJMBE-06-2020-0157.
  • Gardner,A.K.,Kosemund,M.,Hogg,D.,Heymann,A.andMartınez, J. (2017), “Settinggoals,not just roles: improvingteamworkthroughgoal-focuseddebriefing”,TheAmericanJournalofSurgery, Vol.213,pp. 249-252.
  • Haddad, G., Haddad, G. andNagpal, G. (2021), “Canstudents’ perceptionof thediverse learning environment affect their intentions toward entrepreneurship?”, Journal of Innovation and Knowledge,Vol. 6No.3,pp. 167-176.
  • Hall, K.andTori, K. (2017), “Best practice recommendation for debriefing in simulation-based education forAustralian undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review”, Clinical SimulationinNursing,Vol. 13,pp. 39-50,doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.10.006.
  • Hebles, M., Yaniz-Alvarez-de-Eulate, C. and Jara, M. (2019), “Impact of cooperative learning on teamworkcompetence”,AcademiaRevistaLatinoamericanadeAdministracion,Vol. 32No. 1, pp.93-106,doi: 10.1108/ARLA-10-2018-0217.
  • Johnston,S.,Cover,F.andNash,R. (2017), “Simulationdebriefingbasedonprinciplesof transferof learning:apilotstudy”,NurseEducationinPractice,Vol. 26,pp. 102-108.
  • Kang,S.J.andMin,H.Y. (2019), “Psychologicalsafetyinnursingeducation”,NurseEducator,Vol.44 No.2,pp.6-9,doi: 10.1097/NNE.000000000000571. Organisational debriefing 449
  • Karkkola,P.,Kuittinen,M.andHintsa,T. (2019), “Roleclarity, roleconflict,andvitalityatwork: the roleof thebasicneeds”,ScandinavianJournal ofPsychology,Vol. 60No. 5,pp.456-463.
  • Lacerenza,C.N.,Gregory,M.,Marshall,A.D.andSalas,E. (2015), “Debrief: thelearningmeeting”, in Allen, J.A.,Lehmann-Willenbrock,N. andRogelberg,S.G. (Eds),TheCambridgeHandbookof MeetingScience,CambridgeUniversityPress,pp.617-633,doi:10.1017/CBO9781107589735.026.
  • Marks,M.A.,Mathieu, J.E.andZaccaro,S.J. (2001),“Atemporallybasedframeworkandtaxonomyof teamprocesses”,TheAcademyofManagementReview,Vol. 26No. 3,pp. 356-376.
  • Matthews,B.,Daigle, J. andCooper, J. (2020), “Causativeeffectsofmotivationto transfer learning amongrelationaldyads: thetestofamodel”,EuropeanJournal ofManagementandBusiness Economics,Vol. 29No.3,pp.297-314.
  • Mundt,A.S.,Gjeraa,K.,Spanager,L.,Petersen,S.S.,Dieckmann,P.andØstergaard,D. (2020), “Okay, let’stalk-shortdebriefingsintheoperatingroom”,Heliyon,Vol.6No.7,e04386,doi:10.1016/j. heliyon.2020.e04386.
  • Paige, J.T.,Garbee,D.D.,Yu,Q.,Zahmjahn, J.,RaquelBaroni,D.C.,Zhu,L.,Rusnak,V.andKiselov, V.J. (2021), “Brick inthewall?Linkingqualityofdebriefingtoparticipant learning inteam trainingof interprofessional students”,BMJSimulationandTechnologyEnhancedLearning, Vol.7No.5,pp. 360-365,doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000685.
  • Parker,H.andduPlooy,E. (2021),“Team-basedgames:catalystsfordevelopingpsychologicalsafety, learningandperformance”, Journal ofBusinessResearch,Vol. 125,pp.45-51.
  • Pascucci,T.,HernandezSanchez,B.andSanchezGarcıa, J.C. (2022), “Beingstressedinthefamilyor marriedwithwork?Aliterature reviewand clusteringofwork-family conflict”, European Journal ofManagement andBusinessEconomics, Vol. 31No. 2, pp. 239-265, doi: 10.1108/ EJMBE-06-2021-0191.
  • Raes,E.,Boon,A.,Kyndt,E. andDochy, F. (2015), “Measuringteamlearningbehaviours through observingverbal teaminteraction”, JournalofWorkplaceLearning,Vol.27No.7,pp.476-500, doi: 10.1108/JWL-01-2015-0006.
  • Reiter-Palmon,R.,Leone,S.,Murugavel,V. andAllen, J.A. (2020), “FosteringEffectivedebriefs: the integral roleof teamreflexivity”,ManagingMeetings inOrganizations,Vol.20,pp. 93-109.
  • Salas,E.,DiazGranados,D.,Klein,C.,Burke,C.S.,Stagl,K.C.,Goodwin,G.F.andHalpin,S.M. (2008), “Does teamtraining improve teamperformance?Ameta-analysis”,HumanFactors,Vol. 50 No.6,pp.903-933.
  • Tannenbaum,S.I.,Beard,R.L.andCerasoli,C.P. (2013),“Conductingteamdebriefsthatwork: lessons fromresearchandpractice”, inSalas,E.,Tannenbaum,S.I.,Cohen,D.andLatham,G.G. (Eds), DevelopingandEnhancingHigh–PerformanceTeams: Evidence-BasedPractices andAdvice, Jossey-Bass,SanFrancisco,CA.
  • Tannenbaum, S.I. and Cerasoli, C.P. (2013), “Do team and individual debriefs enhance challengesperformance?Ameta-analysis”,HumanFactors,Vol. 55No. 1,pp. 231-245,doi: 10. 1177/0018720812448394.
  • Thomas, D.R. (2006), “Ageneral inductive approach for analyzingqualitative evaluation data”, AmericanJournal ofEvaluation,Vol.27No.2,pp. 237-246,doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748.
  • Torrelles, C., Parıs, G., Sabria, B. and Alsinet, C. (2015), “Assessing teamwork competence”, Psicothema,Vol. 27No. 4,pp.354-361,doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.284.
  • Turner, S. andHarder, N. (2018), “Psychological safe environment: a concept analysis”, Clinical SimulationinNursing,Vol. 18,pp. 47-55,doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.02.004.
  • Vallejo,R. andFinol deFranco,M. (2009), “La triangulacioncomoprocedimientodeanalisispara investigacioneseducativas”,Redhecs,Vol.7No.4,pp.117-133,availableat:http://publicaciones. urbe.edu/index.php/REDHECS/article/viewArticle/620
  • Wang,Y.andLei, J. (2018), “Theactionmechanismof teamlearningorientationinpromotingteam performance”, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp.581-596. EJMBE 32,4 450
  • Widmann,A.,Messmann,G.andMulder,R.H. (2016),“Theimpactofteamlearningbehaviorsonteam innovativeworkbehavior:asystematicreview”,HumanResourceDevelopmentReview,Vol.15 No.4,pp.429-458.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet