Russia after the EuromaidanForeign Policy Limitations amid Clashing Geostrategies of Territorial Expansion and Eurasian Integration

  1. Pardo Sauvegeot, Eric 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

Aldizkaria:
Geopolítica(s): revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder

ISSN: 2172-3958,  2172-7155

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Alea: 14

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 267-289

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.5209/GEOP.90264 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Geopolítica(s): revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder

Laburpena

Following the Euromaidan, Russia responded with military intervention in Ukrainian territory. This revision of the status quo took a more brutal turn in February 2022. The reasons for Russia’s revisionism fit into the debate on the increasing estrangement between the Russian Federation and the West, along with a renewal of the classical characterization of Russia as an “imperialist” state bent on restoring the Moscow-centered power of the former Soviet Union (FSU). Although the broad characterization of Russia as “imperialist” adeptly captures its brutal denial of Ukraine’s sovereignty, it still conflates different geographic vectors and historical periods. This article contributes to the ongoing debates by employing William Walters’s concepts of “geostrategic perspectives” (i.e., march, colonial frontier, and limes) and the Westphalian and Imperial geopolitical models of Christopher S. Browning and Pertti Joenniemi. This framework encapsulates, on the one hand, the complex compatibility of the processes of territorial revisionism and, on the other hand, Russia-centric regional integration of the FSU. Ultimately, the goal is to analyze Russia’s post-Euromaidan border politics, addressing both the revision of Ukraine’s borders and regional integration through the Eurasian Economic Union during the status quo that lasted until 2022. The resulting picture shows that the Russian Federation’s Westphalian geopolitical model of limes expansion contradicts the imperial geopolitical model based on the creation of colonial frontiers. The incremental reinforcement of the Westphalian model since February 2022 raises the interesting question of how this will affect imperial geopolitics regarding other FSU countries.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • ABC News. (2022).Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks exclusively to ABC News [videorecording].
  • ABC World News Tonight, 7 March. Accessed 12 September 2023. Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/volodymyr-zelenskyy-speaks-exclusively-abcnews-83306962
  • Akchurina, V., and Della Sala, V. (2018). Russia, Europe and the Ontological Security Dilemma: Narrating the Emerging Eurasian Space. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(10), 1638-1655.
  • Anceschi, L. (2017). Kazakhstani Neo-Eurasianism and Nazarbayev´s Anti-Imperial Foreign Policy. In M. Bassin and G. Pozo (Eds.), The politics of Eurasianism: identity, popular culture and Russia’s foreign policy (pp. 283-300). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Averre, D. (2016). The Ukraine Conflict: Russia’s Challenge to European Security Governance. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(4), 699-725.
  • Barbashin, A., and Thoburn H. (2014). Putin’s Brain: Alexander Dugin and the Philosophy behind Putin’s Invasion of Crimea. Foreign Affairs, 14 March. Accessed 12 October 2023. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-03-31/putins-brain
  • Bassin, M. (2008). Eurasianism ‘Classical’ and ‘Neo’: The Lines of Continuity. In T. Mochitsuki (Ed.), Beyond the Empire: Images of Russia in the Eurasian Cultural Context (pp. 279-94). Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University.
  • Bassin, M. (2017). “What Is More Important, Blood or Soil?” Rasologiia Contra Eurasianism. In M. Bassin and G. Pozo (Eds.), The politics of Eurasianism: identity, popular culture and Russia’s foreign policy (pp. 39-58). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Becker, M. E., Cohen, M. S., Kushi, S., and McManus, I. P. (2016). Reviving the Russian Empire: The Crimean Intervention through a Neoclassical Realist Lens. European Security, 25(1), 112-133.
  • Bogdanov, A. (2021). Contested ‘Logic of Anarchy’ in the Post-Soviet Space: The ‘Near Abroad’ Faces Russia’s Power. Problems of Post-Communism, 68(6), 487-497.
  • Boguslavska, K. (2015). The First Steps of the Eurasian Economic Union: Disputes, Initiatives and Results. Russian Analytical Digest, (170), 9-14. Center for Security Studies (CSS). Put on line on July 7th 2015. Accessed 23 Auhust 2023. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/192447/Russian_Analytical_Digest_172.pdf
  • Borrell, J. (2022). It Is a Matter of Life and Death. So the EU Will Provide Weapons for Ukraine’s Armed Forces. The Guardian, 27 February. Accessed 24 January 2023. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/27/eu-will-provideweapons-for-ukraine-josep-borrell
  • Browning, C. S., and Joenniemi, P. (2008). Geostrategies of the European Neighborhood Policy. European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), 519-551.
  • Busygina, I., and Filippov, M. (2021). Russia, Post-Soviet Integration, and the EAEU: The Balance between Domination and Cooperation. Problems of Post-Communism, 68(6), 477-486.
  • Clover, C. (1999). Dreams of the Eurasian Heartland. Foreign Policy, 78(2), 9-13.
  • Cooper, J. (2012). Russia’s Trade Relations within the Commonwealth of Independent States. In E. W. Rowe and S. Torjesen (Eds.), The Multilateral Dimension in Russian Foreign Policy (pp. 163-180). London: Routledge.
  • Cooper, J. (2013). The Development of Eurasian Economic Integration. In R. Dragneva and
  • K. Wolczuk (Eds.), Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics (pp. 15-33). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • De Miguel, B. (2021). La OTAN advierte a Rusia: “Hay que respetar la integridad territorial de Bielorrusia”. El País, 31 March. Accessed 20 October. Retrieved from https://elpais.com/internacional/2021-05-31/jens-stoltenberg-secretario-general-de-la-otan-rusiadebe-respetar-la-integridad-territorial-de-bielorrusia.html
  • Deyermond, R. (2016). The Uses of Sovereignty in Twenty-First Century Russian Foreign Policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(6), 957-984.
  • Dragneva, R., and Wolczuk K. (2017). The Eurasian Economic Union: Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House. Accessed June 16, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/eurasian-economic-union-deals-rules-and-exercise-power
  • Forsberg, T., and Pursiainen C. (2017). The Psychological Dimension of Russian Foreign Policy: Putin and the Annexation of Crimea. Global Society, 31(2), 220-244.
  • Foxall, A. (2019). From Evropa to Gayropa: A Critical Geopolitics of the European Union as Seen from Russia. Geopolitics, 24(1), 174-193.
  • Freire, M. R. (2019). The Quest for Status: How the Interplay of Power, Ideas, and Regime Security Shapes Russia’s Policy in the Post‑Soviet Space. International Politics, 56(1), 795-809.
  • Freire, M. R. (2020). EU and Russia Competing Projects in the Neighborhood: An Ontological Security Approach. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 63(1), 1-18.
  • Gleason, A. (2010). Eurasia: What Is It? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1(1), 26-32.
  • Glebov, S. (2008). Wither Eurasia? History of Ideas in an Imperial Situation. Ab Imperio, (2), 345-376.
  • Gotev, G. (2014). Barroso: Without EU Enlargement, Russia Would Have Gobbled Up Bulgaria, the Baltics. Euractiv, 29 October. Accessed 13 October 2023. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/barroso-without-eu-enlargementrussia-would-have-gobbled-up-bulgaria-the-baltics/
  • Gotz, E. (2015). It’s Geopolitics Stupid: Explaining Russia’s Ukraine Policy. Global Affairs, 1(1), 3-10
  • Gotz, E. (2017). Putin, the State, and War: The Causes of Russia’s Near Abroad Assertion Revisited. International Studies Review, 19(2), 228-253.
  • Hansen, F. S. (2013). Integration in the Post-Soviet Space. International Area Studies Review, 16(2), 142-159.
  • Haukkala, H. (2016). A Perfect Storm: Or What Went Wrong and What Went Right for the EU in Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(4), 653-664.
  • Hill, F. (2014). Mr. Putin and the Art of the Offensive Defense: Approaches to Foreign Policy (Part Two). Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/mr-putinand-the-art-of-the-offensive-defense-approaches-to-foreign-policy-part-two/
  • Ingram, A. (2001). Alexander Dugin: Geopolitics and Neo-Fascism in Post-Soviet Russia. Political Geography, 20(8), 1029-1051.
  • Jańczak, J. (2020). Construction and Deconstruction of the Borders of (Re)Integration Projects in Eurasia: The Western and Eastern ‘Edges’ of Russia. Acta Slavica Japonica, (40): 85-108.
  • Kalinin, K. (2019). Neo-Eurasianism and the Russian Elite: The Irrelevance of Aleksandr Dugin’s Geopolitics. Post-Soviet Affairs, 35(5-6), 461-470.
  • Kerr, D. (1995). The New Eurasianism: The Rise of Geopolitics in Russia’s Foreign Policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 47(6), 977-988.
  • Kolossov, V., and Turovsky, R. (2001). Russian Geopolitics at the Fin‐de‐Siecle. Geopolitics, 6(1), 141-164.
  • Korosteleva, E., and Paikin Z. (2020). Russia between East and West, and the Future of Eurasian Order. International Politics, 58(3), 321-333.
  • Krugman, P. (2022). Russia is a Potemkin Superpower. The New York Times, 28 February. Accessed 31 March. Accessed 13 August 2023. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/28/opinion/putin-military-sanctions-weakness.html
  • Kucera, J. (2022). CSTO agrees to intervene in Kazakhstan unrest. Eurasianet, 5 January. Accessed 16 March 2023. Retrieved from https://eurasianet.org/csto-agrees-to-intervenein-kazakhstan-unrest
  • Lane, D. (2016). The International Context: Russia, Ukraine and the Drift to East–West Confrontation. International Critical Thought, 6(4), 623-644.
  • Laruelle, M. (2015). The “Russian World”: Russia’s Soft Power and Geopolitical Imagination. Washington: Center on Global Interests.
  • Libman, A. (2011). Russian Federalism and Post-Soviet Integration: Divergence of Development Paths. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(8), 1323-1355.
  • Littell, J. (2022). War Brought Vladimir Putin to Power in 1999. Now, It Must Bring Him Down. The Guardian, 3 March. Accessed 2 February 2023. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/03/vladimir-putin-ukraine-warchechnya
  • Lo, B. (2002). Russian Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era: Reality, Illusion and Mythmaking. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Mankoff, J. (2014). Russia’s Latest Land Grab: How Putin Won Crimea and Lost Ukraine. Foreign Affairs, 93(3), 60-68.
  • Marsh, S., Murray, M., Chambers, M., Lehto, E., Johnson, S., and Maclean, W. (2022). Don’t assume “imperialistic” Putin won’t attack other countries, Scholz says. Reuters, 3 May. Accessed 21 May 2023. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germanywould-support-finland-sweden-nato-bid-scholz-2022-05-03/
  • Marten, K. (2015). Putin’s Choices: Explaining Russian Foreign Policy and Intervention in Ukraine. Washington Quarterly, 38(2), 189-214.
  • McFaul, M. (2014). Moscow’s Choice. Foreign Affairs, 93(6), 167-170.
  • Mearsheimer, J. (2014). Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77-89.
  • Metcalf, L. K. (1997). The (Re)Emergence of Regional Economic Integration in the Former Soviet Union. Political Research Quarterly, 50(3), 529-549.
  • Mileski, T. 2015. Identifying the New Eurasian Orientation in Modern Russian Geopolitical Thought. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 6(2), 177-187.
  • Morozova, N. (2009). Geopolitics, Eurasianism and Russian Foreign Policy under Putin. Geopolitics, 14(4), 667-686.
  • Munk Debates (2022). Podcast on Russia-Ukraine War. Munk Debate, 29 June. Accessed 13 April. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljVrpEYgnvw
  • Neumann, I. B. (1996). Russia and the Idea of Europe: A Study in Identity and International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Nygren, B. (2008). The Rebuilding of Greater Russia: Putin’s Foreign Policy towards the CIS Countries. London: Routledge.
  • Oskanian, K. (2018). A Very Ambiguous Empire: Russia’s Hybrid Exceptionalism. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(1), 26-52.
  • Panfilova, V. (24th of October 2023). Kazakhstan was praised for its “support” of anti-Russian sanctions [Казахстан похвалили за “поддержку” антироссийских санкций]. Nazavisimaya Gazeta, 24 October. Accessed 2 June 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.ng.ru/cis/2023-10-24/1_8860_kazakhstan.html
  • Podadera, P. R., and Garashchuk, A. (2016). The Eurasian Economic Union: Prospective Regional Integration in the Post-Soviet Space or Just Geopolitical Project? Eastern Journal of European Studies, 7(2), 91-110.
  • Pozo, G. (2017). Eurasianism in Russian Foreign Policy: The Case of the Eurasian Economic Union. In M. Bassin and G. Pozo (Eds.), The politics of Eurasianism: identity, popular culture and Russia’s foreign policy (pp. 161-180). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Prozorov, S. (2007). The Narratives of Exclusion and Self-Exclusion in the Russian Conflict Discourse on EU–Russian Relations. Political Geography, 26, 309-236.
  • Pryce, P. (2013). Putin’s Third Term: The Triumph of Eurasianism? Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 13(1), 25-43.
  • Putz, C. (2021). Kazakhstan: Please Don’t ‘Politicize’ the Eurasian Economic Union. Diplomat, 9 June. Accessed 24 July 2023. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2021/06/kazakhstan-please-dont-politicize-the-eurasian-economic-union/
  • Roberts, S. P., and Moshes A. (2016). The Eurasian Economic Union: A Case of Reproductive Integration? Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(6), 542-565.
  • Samokhvalov, V. (2018). What Kind of ‘Other’? Identity and Russian–European Security Interaction in Eurasia. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(5), 791-813.
  • Satubaldina, A. (2021). Kazakhstan Presents New Latin Alphabet, Plans Gradual Transition Through 2031. The Astana Times, 1 February. Accessed 12 February. Retrieved from https://astanatimes.com/2021/02/kazakhstan-presents-new-latin-alphabet-plans-gradualtransition-through-2031/
  • Shekhovtsov, A. (2008). The Palingenetic Thrust of Russian Neo-Eurasianism: Ideas of Rebirth in Aleksandr Dugin’s Worldview. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 9(4), 491-506.
  • Shekhovtsov, A. (2009). Alexandr Dugin’s Neo-Eurasianism: The New Right a la Russe. Religion Compass, 3(4), 697-716.
  • Smith, G. (1999). The Masks of Proteus: Russia, Geopolitical Shift and the New Eurasianism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(4), 481-494.
  • Smith, H. (2016). Statecraft and Post-Imperial Attractiveness: Eurasian Integration and Russia as a Great Power. Problems of Post-Communism, 63(3), 171-82.
  • Smith, J., and Richardson, P. (2017). The Myth of Eurasia—A Mess of Regions. Journal of Borderland Studies, 32(1), 1-6.
  • Schmidt, M. (2005). Is Putin Pursuing a Policy of Eurasianism? Demokratizatsiya, 13(1), 87-99.
  • Stent, A. (2010). Reluctant Europeans: Three Centuries of Russian Ambivalence towards the West. In R. Legvold (Ed.), Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past (pp. 393-441). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Suslov, M. (2018). “Russian world” concept: Post-Soviet geopolitical ideology and the logic of “spheres of influence. Geopolitics, 23(2), 330-353.
  • Tadeo, M., and Seputyte, M. (2021). Lithuanian President Warns Russia Aims to ‘Swallow’ Belarus. Bloomberg, 28 May. Accessed 23 August 2023. Retrieved from
  • Torbakov, I. (2017). Defining The “True” Nationalism : Russian Ethnic Nationalists vs. Eurasianists. In M. Bassin and G. Pozo (Eds.), The politics of Eurasianism: identity, popular culture and Russia’s foreign policy (pp. 19-38). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Treisman, D. (2016). Why Putin Took Crimea: The Gambler in the Kremlin. Foreign Affairs, 95(3), 47-54.
  • Troitskiy, E. (2020). The Eurasian Economic Union at Five: Great Expectations and Hard Times. Wilson Center, 14 January. Accessed 5 August 2023. Retrieved from https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/eurasian-economic-union-five-great-expectations-and-hard-times
  • Tsygankov, A. P. (1997). From International Institutionalism to Revolutionary Expansionism: The Foreign Policy Discourse of Contemporary Russia. Mershon International Studies Review, 41 (Supplement_2), 247-268.
  • Tsygankov, A. P. (1998). Hard-Line Eurasianism and Russia’s Contending Geopolitical Perspectives. East European Quarterly, 32(3), 315-334.
  • Tsygankov, A. P. (2003). Mastering Space in Eurasia: Russia’s Geopolitical Thinking after the Soviet Break-up. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36(1), 101-127.
  • Tsygankov, A. P. (2007). Finding a Civilizational Idea: “East,” “Eurasia,” and “Euro-East” in Russia’s Foreign Policy. Geopolitics, 12(3), 375-399.
  • Tsygankov, A. P. (2012). The Heartland No More: Russia’s Weakness and Eurasia’s Meltdown. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 3(1), 1-9.
  • Tsygankov, A. (2015). Vladimir Putin’s Last Stand: The Sources of Russia’s Ukraine Policy. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(4), 279–03.
  • Tsygankov, A. P. (2019). Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Vieira, A. (2017). A Tale of Two Unions: Russia–Belarus Integration Experience and Its Lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union. Journal of Borderland Studies, 32(1), 41-53.
  • Vieira Guedes, A. (2016). Eurasian Integration: Elite Perspectives Before and After the Ukraine Crisis. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(6), 566–580.
  • Vinokurov, E., and Libman. A. (2011). Regional Integration Trends in the Post-Soviet Space. Problems of Economic Transition, 53(12), 43-58.
  • Walters, W. (2004). The Frontiers of the European Union: A Geostrategic Perspective. Geopolitics, 9(3), 674-698.
  • Waltz, K. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41.
  • Zachmann, G., Dabrowski, M., and Dominguez-Jimenez, M. (2020). Ukraine: trade reorientation from Russia to the EU. Brueghel. Retrieved from: https://www.bruegel.org/blogpost/ukraine-trade-reorientation-russia-eu
  • Zaporozhchenko, R. (2023). The End of “Putin’s Empire?” Ontological Problems of Russian Imperialism in the Context of the War against Ukraine. Problems of Post-Communism. https://doi.org/0.1080/10758216.2022.2158873
  • Zhukov, S., and Reznikova. O. (2008). Economic Integration in the Post-Soviet Space. Russian Social Science Review, 49(4), 80-92.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet