Going green through local fiscal equalisation

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, V. M., Pressey, R. L., and Naidoo, R. (2010). Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation?. Biological Conservation, 143(2), 439-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.011
• Alloza, M., González-Díez, V., Moral-Benito, E., and Tello-Casas, P. (2021). El acceso a servicios en la España rural. Banco de España, Documentos Ocasionales, 2122. https://www.bde.es/f/webbde/SES/Secciones/Publicaciones/PublicacionesSeriadas/Docu mentosOcasionales/21/Fich/do2122.pdf
• Anderson, T.L., Hill, P.J. (1996). Environmental federalism: thinking smaller. PERC Policy Series, Issue No. PS-8, Bozeman, MT. https://www.perc.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2018/02/ps8.pdf
• Ardiansyah, F., and Jotzo, F. (2013). Decentralization and avoiding deforestation: The case of Indonesia. In Howes, S., and Govinda Rao, M. (eds). Federal Reform Strategies: Lessons from Asia and Australia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198092001.003.0009
• Azzoni, C. R., and Isai, J. Y. (1994). Estimating the costs of environmental protection in Brazil. Ecological Economics, 11(2), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90023-X
• Boadway, R., and Shah, A. (2007). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice. Public Sector Governance and Accountability. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7171
• Borie, M., Mathevet, R., Letourneau, A., Ring, I., Thompson, J. D., and Marty, P. (2014). Exploring the contribution of fiscal transfers to protected area policy. Ecology and Society, 19(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269477
• Boroumand, R. H., Goutte, S., Porcher, T., and Stocker, T. F. (2022). A fair and progressive carbon price for a sustainable economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 303, 113935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113935
• Campos, L. D. R. (2000). ICMS Ecológico: experiências nos estados do Paraná, São Paulo, Minas Gerais e alternativas na Amazônia. Trabalho apresentado na 3ª reunião temática do programa piloto para proteção de florestas tropicais. Cuiabá (MT).
• Canan, S., and Ceyhan, V. (2020). The link between production efficiency and opportunity cost of protecting environment in TR83 region, Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(28), 35112-35125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09726-9
• Cao, H., Qi, Y., Chen, J., Shao, S., and Lin, S. (2021). Incentive and coordination: Ecological fiscal transfers' effects on eco-environmental quality. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106518
• Carattini, S., Kallbekken, S., and Orlov, A. (2019). How to win public support for a global carbon tax. Nature, 565, 289–291 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00124-x
• Cheng, Y., Ma, B., and Sun, Y. (2023). Does central ecological transfer payment enhance local environmental performance? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Ecological Economics, 212, 107920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107920
• Clinch, J. P., Dunne, L., and Dresner, S. (2006). Environmental and wider implications of political impediments to environmental tax reform. Energy Policy, 34(8), 960-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.048
• Courchene, T. J., and Beavis, D. A. (1973). Federal-provincial tax equalization: an evaluation. Canadian Journal of Economics, 483-502. https://doi.org/10.2307/134086
• De Mello, L., and Ter-Minassian, T. (2023). Decarbonisation and intergovernmental fiscal relations: Policy challenges and reform options, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 43, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c434c385-en.
• Dougherty, S., and Montes-Nebreda, A. (2023). The multi-level fiscal governance of ecological transition, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 44, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2051f0f7-en.
• Droste, N., Lima, G. R., May, P. H., and Ring, I. (2017). Municipal responses to ecological fiscal transfers in Brazil: a microeconometric panel data approach. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(4), 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1760
• Droste, N., Ring, I., Santos, R., and Kettunen, M. (2018a). Ecological fiscal transfers in Europe– evidence-based design options for a transnational scheme. Ecological Economics, 147, 373- 382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.031
• Droste, N., Becker, C., Ring, I., and Santos, R. (2018b). Decentralization effects in ecological fiscal transfers: a Bayesian structural time series analysis for Portugal. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71(4), 1027-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0195-7
• Droste, N., Farley, J., Ring, I., May, P. H., and Ricketts, T. H. (2019). Designing a global mechanism for intergovernmental biodiversity financing. Conservation Letters, 12(6), e12670. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12670
• EEA (2007). Climate change: the cost of inaction and the cost of adaptation. European Environmental Agency Technical Report. No 13/2007, Copenhagen. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/technical_report_2007_13/file
• European Court of Auditors (2020). Annual reports concerning the financial year 2019. https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=53898.
• Ewers, H. J., Rehbinder, E., and Wiggering, H. (1997). Umweltbezogene Erweiterung des Finanzausgleichs. Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung, 2, 135-147.
• Ferede, E. (2014). The Incentive Effects of Equalization Grants on Fiscal Policy. SPP Research Paper, 07.23. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2510562
• Ferraro, P. J. (2002). The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Ecological Economics, 43(2-3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00219-7
• Gainza, X., and Montes-Nebreda, A. (2023). The Waste War: on the electoral costs of local sustainability policies. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2023.2238638
• Gong, C., Zhang, J., and Liu, H. (2021). Do industrial pollution activities in China respond to ecological fiscal transfers? Evidence from payments to national key ecological function zones. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(7), 1184-1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1813695
• Gonzalez-Garcia, S., Manteiga, R., Moreira, M. T., and Feijoo, G. (2018). Assessing the sustainability of Spanish cities considering environmental and socio-economic indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.056
• Goulder, L. H. (1995). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: a reader's guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), 157-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877495
• Guo, S., Wen, L., Wu, Y., Yue, X., and Fan, G. (2020). Fiscal decentralization and local environmental pollution in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228661
• Harrison, K. (1996). Passing the Buck: Federalism and Canadian Environmental Policy. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, Canada. https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0086372
• He, L., Wu, M., Wang, D., and Zhong, Z. (2018). A study of the influence of regional environmental expenditure on air quality in China: the effectiveness of environmental policy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(8), 7454-7468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1033-8
• HM Government (2022). Levelling up the United Kingdom. Secretary State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, London. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachmen t_data/file/1052708/Levelling_up_the_UK_white_paper.pdf
• Hossu, C. A., Iojă, I. C., Mitincu, C. G., Artmann, M., and Hersperger, A. M. (2021). Assessing planning implementation using the conformance and performance approach: The case of omania's local environmental action plans. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113680
• Huang, Y., and Zhou, Y. (2020). How does vertical fiscal imbalance affect environmental pollution in China? New perspective to explore fiscal reform’s pollution effect. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25), 31969-31982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09072- w
• Ihobe (2019). Evaluación de la vulnerabilidad y riesgo de los municipios vascos ante el cambio climático. Departamento de Medio Ambiente, Planificación Territorial y Vivienda. Gobierno Vasco. Vitoria-Gasteiz. https://www.euskadi.eus/contenidos/documentacion/municipios_cc/es_def/adjuntos/vul nerabilidad_municipios_cambio_climatico.pdf
• Irawan, S., and Tacconi, L. (2016). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers, Forest Conservation and Climate Change. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. https://www.eelgar. com/shop/gbp/intergovernmental-fiscal-transfers-forest-conservation-and-climatechange- 9781784716592.html
• Karsenty, A., Vogel, A., and Castell, F. (2014). Carbon rights, REDD+ and payments for environmental services. Environmental Science & Policy, 35, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.013
• Köthenbürger, M. (2002). Tax competition and fiscal equalization. International Tax and Public Finance, 9(4), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016511918510
• Kunce, M., and Shogren, J. F. (2008). Efficient decentralized fiscal and environmental policy: a dual purpose Henry George tax, Ecological Economics, 65(3), 569–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.004
• Liu, L., Ding, D., and He, J. (2019). Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and haze pollution decoupling effects: a simple model and evidence from China. Computational Economics, 54(4), 1423-1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9700-x
• Loft, L., Pham, T.T., and Luttrell, C. (2014). Lessons from payments for ecosystem services for national REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms. Policy Brief, 68. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/infobrief/4488-infobrief.pdf
• Loureiro, W. (2002). ICMS Ecológico-A consolidação de uma experiência brasileira de incentivo a Conservação da Biodiversidade. In Congresso Brasileiro de Unidades de Conservação, Vol. 3, 02-12. https://acervodigital.ufpr.br/bitstream/handle/1884/25377/T%20- %20LOUREIRO%2c%20WILSON.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2021). Adapting Fiscal Decentralization Design to Combat Climate Change. Climate Governance Papers. World Bank, Washington, D. C. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/654941625173951298/Adapting-Fiscal- Decentralization-Design-to-Combat-Climate-Change
• Mato Grosso (2009). ICMS Ecológico: Conservando a Biodiversidade Mato-grossense. Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente SEMA. Superintendência de Biodiversidade. Coordenadoria de Unidades de Conservação. Mato Grosso, Brazil: SEMA/Cuiabá
• May, P. H., Gebara, M. F., Conti, B. R., and Lima, G. R. (2012). The Ecological Value Added Tax (ICMS-Ecológico) in Brazil and its effectiveness in State biodiversity conservation: a comparative analysis, Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics, Rio de Janeiro. https://www.isecoeco.org/conferences/isee2012-versao3/pdf/sp33.pdf
• May, P.H., Gebara, M.F., Lima, G., Jordão, C., Nogueira, P., and Grieg-Gran, M. (2013). The effectiveness and fairness of the Ecological ICMS as a fiscal transfer for biodiversity conservation. A tale of two municipalities in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Paper prepared for the Policymix project and presented at the European Society for Ecological Economics Conference, Lille: https://policymix.nina.no/Portals/policymix/Documents/Summaries/May%20et%20al%20 2013%20ICMS-E.pdf?ver=D79Ij4KK1xyZ2i8LzhdfVA%3d%3d
• Mazziotta, M., and Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for constructing composite indices: One for all or all for one. Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, 67(2), 67-80. https://www.istat.it/en/files/2013/12/Rivista2013_Mazziotta_Pareto.pdf
• MITECO (2021a). Directrices para la creación de Zonas de Bajas Emisiones. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. Madrid. https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/calidad-y-evaluacion-ambiental/participacionpublica/ borradordirectricesparalacreaciondezonasdebajasemisiones_tcm30-530517.pdf
• Montes-Nebreda, A., and Moreno, J. (2022). Acelerar la transición ecológica: el Mecanismo de Ajuste en Frontera y la Unión Fiscal. In Eurobasque (2022). El futuro de la Unión Europea: Aportaciones a la Conferencia, 183-244. Dykinson. Madrid. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5294415
• Mumbunan, S., Ring, I., and Lenk, T. (2012). Ecological fiscal transfers at the provincial level in Indonesia. UFZ-Diskussionspapiere, No. 06/2012. Leipzig, Germany: UFZ. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55837/1/687842077.pdf
• Musgrave, R.A. (1983). Who should tax, where, and what? In McLure Jr, C.E. (ed), Tax Assignment in Federal Countries. Canberra: Australian National University Press. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/114811/2/b11388808.pdf
• Nascimento M., Van Bellen H. M., Borget A., and Nascimento, M. (2011). Ecological-ICMS: Analysis of financial aspects and sustainability in the municipalities of the state of Paraná. Revista Capital Científico, Guarapuava, 9, 2.
• Nieto Masot, A., Cárdenas Alonso, G., and Engelmo Moriche, Á. (2020). Design of a Development Index for Spanish Municipalities. Sustainability, 12(21), 8910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218910
• Nikitina, E. (2019). Opportunity cost of environmental conservation in the presence of externalities: Application to the farmed and wild salmon trade-off in Norway. Environmental and Resource Economics, 73(2), 679-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640- 018-0278-0
• Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, Aldine Atherton. https://worldcat.org/en/title/162572
• Oates, W.E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
• Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120- 1149. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564874
• Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9
• OCTE – Órgano de Coordinación Tributaria de Euskadi (2020). Informe Anual Integrado de la Hacienda Vasca 2018. Departamento de Economía y Hacienda. Gobierno Vasco. Vitoria – Gasteiz. https://www.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/iai_2018/es_def/adjuntos/IAI2018.pdf
• OECD, and EC JRC (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing. Paris. https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf
• OECD (2020). A Territorial Approach to the Sustainable Development Goals: Synthesis report, OECD Urban Policy Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e86fa715-en
• OECD (2021). Fiscal Federalism 2022: Making Decentralisation Work, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/201c75b6-en.
• OECD (2023). City-to-City Partnerships to Localise the Sustainable Development Goals, OECD Urban Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d2fe7530-en.
• Olson, M. (1969). The principle of "fiscal equivalence": the division of responsibilities among different levels of government. American Economic Review, 59(2), 479-487. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1823700
• Onrubia, J. (2016). Financiación autonómica y administración tributaria, Mediterráneo Económico, 30, 231-271. https://www.publicacionescajamar.es/publicacionescajamar/public/pdf/publicacionesperiodicas/ mediterraneo-economico/30/mediterraneo-economico-30.pdf
• Petchey, J., and Levtchenkova, S. (2002). The welfare effects of fiscal equalisation in a federal economy with factor mobility and strategic behaviour. Mimeo, School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University.
• Petchey, J., and Levtchenkova, S. (2004). Fiscal equalisation in Australia: proposals for an efficiency-based system. Economic Papers, 23(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2004.tb00364.x
• Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich, O., Church, J. M., Pietrapertosa, F., De Gregorio-Hurtado, S., D’Alonzo, V., Foley, A., Simoes, S. G., Lorencová, E. K., Orru, H., Orru, K., Wejs, A., Flacke, J., Olazabal, M., Geneletti, D., Feliu, E., Vasilie, S., Nador, C., Krook-Riekkola, A., Matosovic, M., Fokaides, P. A., Ioannou, B. I., Flamos, A., Spyridaki, N-A., Balzan, M. V., Fülöp, O., Paspaldzhiev, I., Grafakos, S., and Dawson, R. (2018). How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220
• Ring, I. (2001). Ökologische Aufgaben und ihre Berü cksichtigung im kommunalen Finanzausgleich. Zeitschrift fu¨ rangewandte Umweltforschung, Sonderheft 13, 236-249.
• Ring, I. (2002). Ecological public functions and fiscal equalisation at the local level in Germany. Ecological Economics, 42(3), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00124-6
• Ring, I. (2008a). Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil. Land Use Policy 25, 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.001
• Ring, I. (2008b). Compensating municipalities for protected areas: Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation in Saxony, Germany. GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 17, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.17.S1.12
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
• Rose, M. T. (1999). Überlegungen zur Berücksichtigung der ökologischen Ausgleichsfunktion ländlicher Räume im kommunalen Finanzausgleich–dargestellt am Beispiel des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. Zeitschrift für angewandte Umweltforschung, 12(2), 267-279.
• Santos, R., Ring, I., Antunes, P., and Clemente, P. (2012). Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation: The Portuguese Local Finances Law. Land Use Policy 29, 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.001
• Scheberle, D. (1997). Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC. https://press.georgetown.edu/Book/Federalism-and-Environmental-Policy
• Schick, A. (1998). Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand’s Reforms, World Bank Research Observer 13, 125–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3986392
• Smoke, P., and Cook, M. (2022). Administrative Decentralization and Climate Change. World Bank. Washington. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36911
• Snoddon, T., and Tombe, T. (2019). Analysis of Carbon Tax Treatment in Canada’s Equalization Program. Canadian Public Policy, 45(3), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2019-036
• Spanish Government (2020). Executive Summary: Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan. Madrid: https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/temas/fondosrecuperacion/ Documents/05052021-Executive_Summary_Recovery_Plan.pdf
• Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University press. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/the-economics-of-climatechange- the-stern-review/
• Tang, Z., Brody, S. D., Quinn, C., Chang, L., and Wei, T. (2010). Moving from agenda to action: evaluating local climate change action plans. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560903399772
• Yan, Z., and Honghua, C. (2020). Did the transfer payment in key eco-functional areas improve the eco-environtment? Based on the results of PSM. South China Journal of Economics, 39, 125–140. 10.19592/j.cnki.scje.371556