Patterns of innovation in the EU-25 regionsa typology and policy recommendations

  1. Mikel Navarro 1
  2. Juan José Gibaja 1
  3. Ricardo Aguado 1
  4. Beñat Bilbao-Osorio 2
  1. 1 Orkestra-Basque Institute of Competitiveness
  2. 2 OECD
Revista:
Orkestra Working Paper Series in Territorial Competitiveness

ISSN: 1989-1288

Año de publicación: 2008

Número: 4

Tipo: Documento de Trabajo

Otras publicaciones en: Orkestra Working Paper Series in Territorial Competitiveness

Resumen

Dokumentu honetan eskualdeen tipologia bat garatu dugu, EB-25eko berrikuntzako eskualdeko eredu askotarikoak biltzeko. Horretarako 21 aldagai aukeratu ditugu, eskualde batek jakintza sortzeko eta bereganatzeko eta I+G berrikuntza eta hazkunde ekonomiko bihurtzeko duen gaitasunarekin lotura dutenak. Osagai nagusizko analisiaren eta kluster analisiaren emaitzetatik abiatuta, berrikuntzako eskualdeko 7 eredu identifikatu ditugu. 7 eredu horietan multzokatu ditugu EB-25eko 186 eskualdeak, sektore espezializazioaren eta ekonomi eta teknologi gaitasun eta emaitzen arabera. Antzeko eskualdeak edo eskualde aurreratuagoak identifikatzean, eskualde homogeneoen arteko alderapenak egin daitezke eta horietatik, politika egokiak ikasi. 7 talde horietako bakoitzerako, artikuluak politiken gomendioak eskaintzen dizkigu, tokiko ezaugarri bereziak kontuan hartuta. Laburbilduz, dokumentu honek ekarpen bikoitza egiten du: lehenengo, EB-25eko eskualdeentzat berrikuntzako ereduen lehenengo tipologia eskaintzen du, aldagai kopuru handia oinarri hartuta osatua; bigarren, analisi honetatik ateratako ondorioak EBko arduradun politikoen jardunean lagungarri izan daitezke, berrikuntzako eskualdeko politikei dagokienez.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abascal Fernández, E.; Landaluce Calvo, M.I. (2002). Análisis Factorial Múltiple como técnica de estudio de la estabilidad de los resultados de un análisis de componentes principales. Qüestiió. Vol. 26, 1-2: 109-122.
  • Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (1999). Learning and adaptation in decentralized business networks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space n. 17: 87-104
  • Anderson, M. and Karlsson, C. (2004). Regional Innovation Systems in Small & Medium-Sized Regions. A Critical Review & Assessment. CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series n. 10.
  • Arundel, A.; Kanerva, M.; Cruysen, A. and Hollanders, H. (2007). Innovation Statistics for the European Service Sector. Pro Inno Europe INNO METRICS.
  • Asheim, B. (2007). Sistemas regionales de innovación y bases de conocimiento diferenciadas: un marco teórico analítico (pp. 65-89). In Buesa, M. and Heijs, J. (coord.) Sistemas regionales de innovación: nuevas formas de análisis y medición. Madrid: Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros.
  • Asheim, B. and Gertler, M. (2005). The Geography of Innovation. Regional Innovation Systems (pp. 291-317). In Fagerberg, J. et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Azua, J. (2000). Alianza coopetitiva para la nueva economía: empresas, gobiernos y regiones innovadoras. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Bathelt, H. (2003). Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective (I) – innovation, institutions and social systems. Progress in Human Geography n. 27, 6: 763778.
  • Bathelt, H. (2004). Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective (II) – knowledge creation and growth in clusters. Progress in Human Geography n. 29, 2: 204216.
  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2003). Cluster and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography n. 28 (1): 31-56. [DRUID Working Paper 2002-12].
  • Baumert, T. (2006). Los determinantes de la innovación. Un estudio aplicado sobre las regiones de la Unión Europea. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Downloadble from: http://www.ucm.es/bucm/cee/iaif
  • Bilbao-Osorio, B. and Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to Innovation and Economic Growth in the EU, Growth and Change Vol. 35, n. 4, 434-455.
  • Braczyk, H.J., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M. (1998). Regional Innovation Systems. The role of governances in a globalized world. London: UCL Press.
  • Bruijn, P. and Lagendijk, A. (2005). Regional Innovation Systems in the Lisbon Strategy. European Planning Studies Vol. 13, n. 8: 1153-1172.
  • Buesa, M.; Baumert, T.; Heijs, J.; and Martínez-Pellitero, M. (2003). Metodología y resultados del índice IAIF de la Innovación Regional. Madri+d n. 16. Downloadble from: www.madrimasd.org
  • Buesa, M.; Martínez-Pellitero, M.; Heijs, J.; and Baumert, T. (2002). Los sistemas regionales de innovación en España: tipología basada en indicadores económicos e institucionales de las Comunidades Autónomas. Economía Industrial n. 347, 15-32.
  • Buesa, M.; Martínez-Pellitero, M.; Baumert, T.; and Heijs, J. (2007). Novel applications of existing econometric instruments to analyse regional innovation systems: the Spanish case (pp. 155-175). In Suriñach et al. (eds.) Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters and Regional Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Cheshire P. and Hay, D. (1989). Urban Problems in Europe, London: Allen and Unwin. Christopherson, S. and Clark, J. (2007). Power in Firm Networks: What it Means for Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies Vol 41.9: 1223-1236.
  • Clarysse, B. and Muldur, U. (1999). Regional cohesion in Europe? An analysis of how EU public RTD support influences the techno-economic regional landscape. European Commission, Directorate General for Science, Research and Development, Working Papers n. 1, January.
  • Cooke, P. (1992). Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe. Geoforum n. 23: 365-382.
  • Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction: origins of the concept (pp. 2-25). In Braczyk, H.J. et al. Regional Innovation Systems. The role of governances in a globalized world. London: UCL Press.
  • Cooke, P. (2005). Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation. Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’ –A new model of industry organization. Research Policy n. 34: 1128-1149
  • Cooke, P. and Morgan, K. (1998). The associational economy. Firms, Regions, and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cooke, P.; Davies, C. and Wilson, R. (2002). Innovation Advantages of Cities: From knowledge to Equity in Five Basic Steps. European Planning Studies vol.10, n. 2: 233-250.
  • Cooke, P.; Heidenreich, M. and Braczyk, H. (2004). Regional Innovation Systems. London: Routledge.
  • Cooke, P.; Laurentis, C.; Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2007). Regional Knowledge Economies. Markets, Clusters and Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Crescenzi, R.; Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Storper, M. (2007). The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe-United States comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Geography n. 7: 673-709.
  • Doloreux, D. (2004). Regional Innovation Systems in Canada: A Comparative Study. Regional Studies vol.38.5: 481-494
  • Doloreux, D. and Parto, S. (2004). Regional Innovation Systems: A critical synthesis. United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, Discussion Paper Series n. 17, August.
  • Dosi, G.; Llerena, P. and Labini, M.S. (2005). Evaluating and Comparing the innovation performance of the United States and the European Union. Expert report prepared for the Trend Chart Policy Workshop 2005.
  • Ecotec (2005). The Territorial Impact of EU Research and Development Policies. ESPON 2.1.2.
  • Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of Innovation. Perspectives and Challenges (pp. 181-208). In Fagerberg, J. et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Evangelista, R.; Iammarino, S.; Mastrostefano, V. and Silvani, A. (2002). Looking for Regional Systems of Innovation: Evidence from the Italian Innovation Survey. Regional Studies vol. 36, 2: 173-186.
  • Fernández-Satto, V. and Vigil-Greco, J.I. (2007). Clusters y desarrollo territorial. Revisión teórica y desafíos metodológicos para América Latina. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio vol. VI, n. 24: 859-912.
  • Freeman, C. (ed.) (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
  • Fritz, M. (2002). Measuring the Quality of Regional Innovation Systems: A Knowledge Production Function Approach. International Regional Science Review n. 25: 86-101.
  • Hollanders, H. (2007). 2006 European Regional Innovation Scoreboard (2006 RIS). European Trend Chart on Innovation.
  • Hommen, L. and Doloreux, D. (2003). Is the regional Innovation System Concept at the End of Its Life Cycle? Paper presented to Innovation in Europe: Dynamics, Institutions and Values, Roskild University, Dinamarca.
  • Howells, J. (2005). Innovation and regional economic development: A matter of perspective? Research Policy n. 34: 1220-1234.
  • Lundvall, B-A. (ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London-New York: Pinter.
  • Lundvall, B-A. (2007). National Innovation Systems-Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation Vol.14, n. 1: 95-119.
  • MacKinnon, D.; Cumbers, A. and Chapman, K. (2002). Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates. Progress in Human Geography n. 26: 293-311.
  • Malik, K. and Cunningham, P.N. (2006). Trans-national Policy Learning in Europe: attempts to transfer innovation policy practices, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice Journal vol. 8(6): 262-272
  • Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (1997). Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industrial agglomeration. European Planning Studies n. 5 (1): 25-41.
  • Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2001). The elusive concept of localization economies. Paper for the ‘Industrial Clusters’ Revisited: Innovative Places or Uncharted Spaces? Session, AAG Annual Conference, New York.
  • Markusen, A. (1999). Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies. Regional Studies vol.33 (9): 869-884.
  • Martínez-Pellitero, M. (2002). Recursos y resultados de los sistemas de innovación: elaboración de una tipología de sistemas regionales de innovación en España. IAIF working paper n. 34. Downloadble from: http://www.ucm.es/bucm/cee/iaif
  • Martínez Pellitero, M. (2007). Los sistemas regionales de innovación en Europa: tipología y eficiencia (pp. 215-256).
  • M. Buesa y J. Heijs (coord.) Sistemas regionales de innovación: nuevas formas de análisis y medición. Madrid: Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros.
  • Martínez-Pellitero, M. and Baumert, T. (2003). Medida de la capacidad innovadora de las Comunidades Autónomas españolas: construcción de un índice regional de la innovación. IAIF working paper n. 35, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Downloadble from: http://www.ucm.es/bucm/cee/iaif
  • Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics n. 23: 167-185.
  • Miles, I. (2005). Innovation in Services (pp.433-458). In Fagerberg, J. et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography n. 4: 3-21.
  • Moulaert, F. and Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies n. 37: 289-302.
  • Mowery, D.C. and Sampat, B.N. (2005). Universities in National Innovation Systems(pp. 209239). In Fagerberg, J. et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Muller, E. and Nauwelaers, C. (2005). Enlarging the ERA: identifying priorities for regional policy focusing on research and technological development in the New Members States and Candidate Countries. Final report COP6-CT.2004.00001.
  • Muscio, A. (2004). From Regional Innovation Systems to Local Innovation Systems: Evidence from Italian Industrial Districts. European Planning Studies Vol. 14, n. 16: 773-789.
  • Navarro, M. (2007). Los sistemas regionales de innovación. Una literatura con claroscuros. IAIF working paper n. 57.
  • Navarro, M. and Buesa, M. (dir.) (2003). Sistemas de innovación y competitividad en el País Vasco. San Sebastián: Eusko Ikaskuntza.
  • Nelson, R.R. (1992). National Innovation Systems: A retrospective on a Study. Industrial and Corporate Change vol. 1, n. 2: 347-374
  • Nelson, R. R. and Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems(pp. 3-21).. In Nelson, R. R. (ed.). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-efective). Why some are slow learners. Research Policy n. 31: 291-302.
  • OECD (2001) Devolution and Globalisation. Implications for local decision-makers. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD (2007). Globalisation and Regional Economies. Paris: OCDE.
  • Oughton, C.; Landabaso, M. and Morgan, K. (2002). The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy, Journal of Technology Transfer n. 27: 97-110.
  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London and Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School.
  • Porter, M.E. (2003). The Economic Performance of Regions. Regional Studies, Vol. 37.6&7: 549–578.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (1999). Innovation prone and innovation averse societies. Economic performance in Europe. Growth and Change n. 30: 75-105
  • Salom, J. (2003). Innovación y actores locales en los nuevos espacios económicos: un estado de la cuestión. Boletín de la A.G.E. n. 36: 7-30.
  • Schurmann, C. and Talaat, A. (2000). Towards a European Peripherality Index. Final Report. Mimeo. Downloadble from: http://www.raumplanung.unidortmund.de/irpud/fileadmin/irpud/content/documents/publica tions/ber53.pdf)
  • Scott, A.J. and Storper, M. (2003). Regions, Globalization, Development. Regional Studies Vol. 37.6&7:579-593.
  • Sharpe, S. and Martínez-Fernández, C. (2006). Measuring regional knowledge resources: What do knowledge occupations have to offer?. DRUID Summer Conference 2006.
  • Spiekermann y Neubauer (2002). European Accessibility and Peripherality: Concepts, Models and Indicators. Nordregio Working Paper 2002/9. Downloadble from: http://www.nordregio.se/Files/wp0209.pdf
  • Sterlacchini, A. (2006). Innovation knowledge and regional economic performances: regularities and differences in the EU. DRUID Summer Conference 2006.
  • Tödtling, F. and Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation Systems in Regions of Europe—A Comparative Perspective. European Planning Studies vol. 7, n. 6: 699-717.
  • Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy n. 34: 1203-1219.