La medición de la Orientación Emprendedora en las empresas familiaresuna revisión crítica de la literatura

  1. Unai Arzubiaga Orueta
  2. Txomin Iturral d e Jainaga
  3. A maia Maseda García
Revista:
European Journal of Family Business

ISSN: 2444-877X

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 2

Número: 2

Páginas: 57-71

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V2I2.4029 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: European Journal of Family Business

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

El presente trabajo realiza una profunda revisión del constructo Orientación Emprendedora (EO) analizando el caso específico de las empresas familiares. Se ha llevado a cabo una clasificación de las obras que contienen un modelo donde el EO desempeña dos f unciones diferentes: por un lado, trabajos en los que éste constructo se ha tomado como una variable dependiente y, por otra parte, artículos en donde ha sido entendido como una variable independiente. Con el propósito de analizar en profundidad el constru cto EO, se ha llevado a cabo una revisión de la literatura de cada una de las cinco dimensiones, centrándose en el caso específico de las empresas familiares. Unido a estas dimensiones, se ha realizado un análisis de cómo se ha medido el constructo EO en l a literatura científica, centrándose en dos de las tendencias más aceptadas: la medición a través de una escala de tres dimensiones o hacerlo mediante una escala de cinco. Finalmente, hemos llevado a cabo una reflexión sobre cuál de estas escalas es más ad ecuada para el caso específico de las empresas familiares justificando nuestra posición.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andersen, J. (2010). A critical examination of the EO - performance relationship. Entrepreneurial behavior and Research, 16(4), 309 - 328.
  • Astrachan, J. H. (2003). Commentary on the special issue: The emergence of a field. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 567 - 572.
  • Baird, I.S. and Thomas, H. (1985). Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Review , 10, 230 – 243.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99 – 119.
  • Birkinshaw, J. (1997) “Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives”. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3):207 - 229
  • Burgelman, R. A. (1984). Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms. California Management Review, 26(3), 154 - 166.
  • Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family - controlled firms. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249 – 265
  • Casillas, J. C., Moreno, A. M., & Barbero, J. L. (2010). A con figurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review , 23(1), 27.
  • Casillas, J. C., Moreno, A. M., & Barbero, J. L. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: Family and e nvironmental dimensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy , 2 (2), 90 - 100.
  • Covin J.G. and Covin, T. (1990). Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and smal firm performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 35 – 50.
  • Covin, J.G., Green, K.M., and Slevin, D.P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 30(1), 57 – 81.
  • Covin, J.G. and Miles, M.P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pu rsuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47 – 63.
  • Covin, J. G., and Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal , 10, 75 - 87.
  • Covin J.G. and Wale s, W.J. (2012). The measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice , 14(4), 35 – 50. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 677 - 702.
  • Cruz, C. and Nordqvist, M. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: a gen erational perspective. Small Business Economics, DOI 10.1007/s11187 - 010 - 9265 - 8.
  • De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. T. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation - performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing , 25(1), 87 - 103.
  • Dickson, P. H. (2004). Entrepreneurial orientation: The role of institutional environment and firm attributes in shaping innovation and proactiveness. Pat, 404, 894 - 4372.
  • Dyer, G., and Whetten, D. A. (2006). Fa mily firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the SandP 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785 – 802.
  • Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F. W., and Zellweger, T. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A stewardship pers pective. Paper presented at the USASBE, San Antonio.
  • Frank, H.; Kessler, A. and Fink, M. (2010) Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance - A replication study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62, 175 - 198.
  • George, B. A., & Marino, L. (2011). The epistemology of entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual formation, modeling, and operationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35 (5). 989 - 1024.
  • Gómez - Mejía, L., Haynes, K., Núñez - Nickel, M., Jacobson, K., and Moyano - Fuentes, J., (2007), Socio emotional wealth and business risks in family - controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106 - 137.
  • Guth, W.; Ginsberg, A (1990) Guest Editor’s Introduction: “Corporate Entrepreneurship”. Strategic Manag ement Journal , 11:5 - 15
  • Hansen, J.D.; Deitz, G.D.; Tokman, M.; Marino, L.D.; Weaver, K.M. (2011) Cross - national invariance of the EO scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (1), 61 - 78.
  • Hughes, M. and Morgan, R.E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship be tween entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 651 – 661.
  • Hui Li,Y.; Wen Huang, J., Tien Tsai, M. (2009) Entrepreneurial Orientation and firm performance: the role of kno wledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management , 38 (4), 440 - 449 .
  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management , 29(6), 963 - 989.
  • Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., and Kyläheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurialorientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 223.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1982). The middle manager as innovator. Harvard Business Review, 60(4), 95 - 106.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation, New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Keh, H. T., Nguyen, T. T. M., & Ng, H. P. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 592 - 611.
  • Kellermanns, F. W., and Eddleston, K. A. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspecti ve. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 809 – 830.
  • Knight, G. A. (1997). Cross - cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing , 12(3), 213 - 225.
  • Kuratko, D. F. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship: An introduction and research review. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research , 129 - 163.
  • Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurship behavior among managers: A review o f theory research and practice. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth , 7, 7 - 45.
  • Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology - based ventures. Strategic Manage ment Journal , 22(6 - 7), 615 - 640.
  • Lee, S. M., Lim, S., & Pathak, R. D. (2011). Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: A multi - country study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal , 7(1), 1 - 15.
  • Lumpkin, G., Cogliser, C., and Schneider, D. ( 2009). Understanding and measuring autonomy: An entrepreneurial orientation perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 47.
  • Lumpkin, G. T., and Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to perform ance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135 - 172.
  • Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 1 6(5), 429 – 451.
  • Martin, W., and Lumpkin, G. T. (2003). From entrepreneurial orientation to family orientation: generational differences in the management of family businesses. Paper presented at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babso n College, Wellesley, MA, USA.
  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770 – 792.
  • Moreno, A. M. and Casillas, J.C., (2008) Entrepreneurial Orientation and Growth of SMEs: a causal model. Entrepre neurship Theory and Practice, 32 (2), 507 - 528.
  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation South - Western Pub.
  • Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., and Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, ris k taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33 – 47.
  • Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal , 14(2), 137 - 153.
  • Nordqvist, M., Habbe rshon, T. G., and Melin, L. (2008). Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring entrepreneurial orientation in family firms. In H. Landstro ̈m, D. Smallbone, H. Crijns, and E. Laveren (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, sustainable growth and performance: Frontiers in European entrepreneurship research (pp. 93 – 116). London: Edward Elgar.
  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G., and Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entre preneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761.
  • Runyan, R. C., Ge, B., Dong, B., & Swinney, J. L. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in Cross Cultural research: Assessing measurement invariance in the construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 36 (4), 819 - 836.
  • Schollhammer, H. (1982). Internal corporate entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, and K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship , pp. 209 - 223. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R. N., and Buchholtz, A. K . ( 2001). Agency relationships in fa m ily fir m s: Theory and evidence. Organization Science , 12(2): 99 - 116.
  • Schulze, W., Lubatkin, M., and Dino, R. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturin g, 18, 473 - 490.
  • Short, J.C., Broberg, J.C., Cogliser, C.C., and Brigham, K.H. (2009). Construct validation using computer - aided text analysis (CATA): An illustration using entrepreneurial orientation. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 1 – 28.
  • Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra - and extraindustry social capital. The Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE, 51(1), 97 - 111.
  • Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (2007). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Harvard Business School , , 155 - 170.
  • Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L.D., Zhang, Y., and Li, Q. (2008). Exploring an inverted u - shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese ven tures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 219 – 239.
  • Tang, J. and Hull, C. (2012). An investigation of EO, perceived environmental hostility, and strategy application among chinese SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50 (1), 132 - 158.
  • Ventakraman, N. (1989) “Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement”. Management Science , 35:423 - 44
  • Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurs hip Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635 - 657.
  • Weismeier - Sammer, D. (2011). Entrepreneurial behavior in family firms: A replication study. Journal of Family Business Strategy , 2(3), 128 - 138.
  • Wiklund, J., and Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 71 - 91.
  • Yin, R.K. (1994), Case Study Research. Design and Methods (2a ed.), London: Sage Publications. Zahra, S. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259 - 285.
  • Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1993). Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strategic Ma nagement Journal , 14(6), 451 - 478.
  • Zahra, S. and Covin, G. (1995) Contextual influences on the CE - performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing , 10 (1), 43 - 58.
  • Zahra, S. and Neubaum, D. (1998) Environmental adversity an d the entrepreneurial activities of new ventures. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship , 3.
  • Zahra, S., and Garvin, D. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effects of international environment hostility. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 469 - 492.
  • Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review , 18(1), 23 - 40.
  • Zellweger, T.W. and Sieger, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation in long - lived family firms, Sm all Business Economics, DOI 10.1007/s11187 - 010 - 9267 - 6
  • Zellweger, T.M., Kellermanns; F.W., and Eddleston; K.A. (2008). Building a family firm image: How family firms capitalize on their families. Paper presented at the USASBE.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet