New statehood (?) in the post-pandemic contexta reflection from the coordinates of the global market form

  1. Ainhoa Lasa López 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Aldizkaria:
Revista de estudios políticos

ISSN: 0048-7694

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Zenbakia: 200

Orrialdeak: 41-69

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de estudios políticos

Laburpena

Globalisation, as a strategy of rupture of the material relationship between the Constitution and the Social State form, has generated an erosion of the legitimising assumptions of state sovereignty of social constitutionalism in terms of depoliticisation. However, the multiple crises experienced by the globalising strategy, with particular reference to health, seem to have consolidated a revisionist discourse based on the revaluation of state sovereignty. Precisely, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether the health pandemic has led to a new context that makes possible the return of the state as a response to the problems of legitimisation posed by the global market order. To this end, the analysis will focus on the measures adopted by the European Union and its member states during the pandemic and post-pandemic phases. The special focus on the European order is due to the fact that it has given a normative nature to the structural principles of global market constitutionalism, being its most complete legal formulation. In parallel, the bulk of the reflection will be accompanied by the methodological premise of the material constitution for its explanatory force of the reality of the state form in the constitutional paradigm of the global market, diluting the mirages of constitutional politics and post-positivist-formalism.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Arrighi, G. (2014). Il lungo XX secolo. Denaro, potere e le origini del nostro tempo. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
  • Azzariti, G. (2015). Vento di cambiamento verso dove? Costituzionalismo.it. Le trasformazioni della Forma di Stato. Rappresentanza, Governabilitá, Partecipazione, 3, 1-12.
  • Bergsen, P., Billon-Galland, A., Kundnani, H., Ntousas, V. and Raines, T. (2020). Europe after coronavirus: the EU and a new political economy. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  • Buti, M. (2020). A tale of two crises: Lessons from the financial crisis to prevent the Great Fragmentation. VoxEU, 13-06-2020. Available at: https://bit.ly/401qvam.
  • Cantaro, A. (2021). Postpandemia, pensieri (meta) giuridici. Torino: Giappichelli.
  • Cantaro, A. (2022). La ragione totalitaria. Neoliberalismo e legittimazione dell’Unione. En A. Lasa López, M. A. García Herrera and G. Maestro Buelga (coords.). La refundación de la Unión Europea y la nueva centralidad estatal (pp. 153-172). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Celi, G., Guarascio, D. and Simonazzi, A. (2020). A fragile and divided European Union meets Covid-19: further disintegration or “Hamiltonian moment”? Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 47 (4), 411-424. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812- 020-00165-8.
  • Cesaratto, S. (2021). An ECB’s Staff Narrative of Two Decades of European Central Banking: a critical review. Quaderni Del Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica, 866, 2-34.
  • Cesaratto, S. (2022). CRISI UE/ L’inflazione si batte con la fine della guerra, non con la recessione. ilsussidiario.net, 03-08-2022. Available at: https://bit.ly/3MCIqkB.
  • Corniare Rivolta (2022). Bellicismo e austerità li pagano sempre i lavoratori. Corniare Rivolta [blog], 21-03-2022. Available at: https://bit.ly/3MB7RTC.
  • Crabtree, J. et al. (2020). The future of the state. Ten leading global thinkers on government after the pandemic. Foreign Policy Magazine. Available at: https://bit.ly/41eGOSo.
  • Crouch, C., Della Porta, D. and Streeck, W. (2016). Democracy in neoliberalism? Antropological Theory, 16 (4), 497-512. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616677904.
  • De Cabo, C. (1978). Sobre la función histórica del constitucionalismo y sus posibles transformaciones. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
  • De Cabo, C. (1993). Teoría histórica del Estado y del Derecho Constitucional (vol. 2). Estado y derecho en la transición al capitalismo y en su evolución: el desarrollo constitucional. Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias.
  • De Cabo, C. 2001). El sujeto y sus derechos. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, 7, 117-136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.7.2001.6531.
  • Di Comidad. (2022). È la lobby della deflazione a gestire il quantitative easing. Sinistrainrete. Available at: https://bit.ly/3UwCb3z.
  • Di Plinio, G. (2019). Constituzione economica e vincoli quantitativi. Per un costituzionalismo non keynesiano. Federalismi.it, Rivista di Diritto Pubblico Italiano, Comparato, Europeo, 5, 103-133.
  • Eurogroup. (2022). Eurogroup statement on the fiscal guidance for 2023. 14-3-2022. Available at: https://bit.ly/3zTmrOO.
  • European Central Bank. (2021). Why is inflation currently so high? 16-11-2021. Available at: https://bit.ly/3GALKJ2.
  • European Central Bank. (2022a). Monetary Policy Decisions. 9-6-2022. Available at: https:// bit.ly/3KUhVG2.
  • European Central Bank. (2022b). The Transmission Protection Instrument. 21-6-2022. Available at: https://bit.ly/3MCuqHG.
  • Fabbrini, F. (2022). The Legal Architecture of the Economic Responses to COVID-19: EMU beyond the Pandemic. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60 (1), 186-203. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13271.
  • Fazzi, Th. and Mitchell, W. (2018). Sovranità o barbarie. Il ritorno della questione nazionale. Milano: Meltemi.
  • Fioravanti, M. (1991). Appunti di storia delle costituzioni moderne. Le libertà: presupposti culturali e modelli storici (vol. 1). Torino: Giappichelli.
  • Fioravanti, M. (1993). Stato e Costituzione. Materiali per una storia delle dottrine costituzionali. Torino: Giappichelli.
  • Galli, C. (2019). Sovranità. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • García Herrera, M. A. (2015). Estado social y Estado económico. Jueces para la Democracia, 84, 51-66.
  • García Herrera, M. A. (2016). Estado económico y capitalismo financiarizado: propuestas para un constitucionalismo crítico. In M. A. García Herrera, J. Asensi Sabater and F. Balaguer Callejón (eds.). Constitucionalismo crítico: liber amicorum Carlos de Cabo Martín (vol. 1) (pp. 145-250). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • García Herrera, M. A. (2022). Estado y soberanía en la nueva fase de acumulación: entre crisis de la integración europea y la reconstrucción del espacio global. In A. Lasa López, M. A. García Herrera and G. Maestro Buelga (eds.). La refundación de la Unión Europea y la nueva centralidad estatal (pp. 225-276). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • García Pelayo, M. (1980). Las transformaciones del Estado contemporáneo. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Gerstle, G. (2022). The rise and fall of the neoliberal order. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197519646.001.0001.
  • Giannone, D. (2019). In perfetto Stato. Indicatori globali e politiche di valutazione dello Stato neoliberale. Milano: Mimesis.
  • Gnesutta, C. (2022). Che cosa preannuncia la ripresa dell’inflazione? Sbilanciamoci.info, 2-8-2022. Available at: https://bit.ly/3UCAXnB.
  • Guazzarotti, A. (2020). Integrazione europea e riduzionismo politico. Costitutizionalismo.it, 3, 1-45.
  • Hanspeter, K. (2020). Is There a Crisis of Democracy in Europe? Polit Vierteljahresschr, 61, 237-260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-020-00231-9.
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001.
  • Kapstein, E. B. (1994). Governing the global economy: international finance and the state. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Kjaer, P. (2019). The transnational constitution of Europe’s social market economies: a question of constitutional imbalances? Journal of Common Market Studies, 57 (1), 143-158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12811.
  • Knight, J. (2001). Explaining the rise of neoliberalism: the mechanism of institutional change. In J. L. Campbell and O. V. Pedersen (eds.). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis (pp. 27-50). New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1515/9780691188225-006.
  • Konicz, T. (2022). Fed e BCE nel vicolo cieco della politica monetaria. Breve storia delle aporie della politica di crisi borghese nella transizione dell’economia mondiale dalla crisi pandemica alla crisi bellica. Blackblog Francosenia [blog], 27-7-2022. Available at: https://bit.ly/3UCB9Dl.
  • Liebert, U. (2016). ‘TINA’ revisited: why alternative narratives of the Eurozone crisis matter. In P. Iglesias Rogriguez, A. Triandafyllidou and R. Gropas (eds.). After the financial crisis. Shifting legal, economic and political paradigms (pp. 303-334). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50956-7_10.
  • Losurdo, F. (2016). Lo Stato sociale condizionato. Stabilità e crescita nell’ordinamento costituzionale. Torino: Giappichelli.
  • Losurdo, F. (2022). Italexit. Trasformazione del vincolo europeo e sovranità condizionata. In A. Lasa López, M. A. García Herrera and G. Maestro Buelga (coords.). La refundación de la Unión Europea y la nueva centralidad estatal (pp. 205-224). Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.
  • Luciani, M. (2008). Costituzione, integrazione europea, globalizzazione. Questione Giustizia, 6, 65-79.
  • Maestro Buelga, G. (2016). Del Estado social a la forma global de mercado. In M. A. García Herrera, J. Asensi Sabater and F. Balaguer Callejón (eds.). Constitucionalismo crítico: liber amicorum Carlos de Cabo Martín (vol. 1) (pp. 59-100). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Maestro Buelga, G. (2021). El constitucionalismo de la forma global de Mercado. In M. Della Morte and C. De Fiores (eds.). Europa e Costituzione. Oltre la globalizzazione neoliberale (pp. 189-219). Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
  • Maestro Buelga, G. (2022). Las precondiciones para la recuperación del espacio constitucional estatal. In A. Lasa López, M. A. García Herrera and G. Maestro Buelga (coords.). La refundación de la Unión Europea y la nueva centralidad estatal (pp. 173-203). Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.
  • Montani, G. (2016). From national to supranational: a paradigm shift in political economy. In P. Iglesias Rogriguez, A. Triandafyllidou and R. Gropas (eds.). After the financial crisis. Shifting legal, economic and political paradigms (pp. 109-138). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50956-7_4.
  • Moro, D. (2020). Nazionalizzazioni, Golden power e aiuti di stato: la partecipazione dello Stato allá competizione intercapitalistica. L’ordine Nuovo, 27-04-2020. Available at: https://bit.ly/4010PKP.
  • Mortati, C. (1972). Il lavoro nella Costituzione. Problemi di diritto pubblico nell’attuale esperienza costituzionale reppublicana. In C. Mortati. Raccolta di Scritti (vol. 3). Milano: Giuffré.
  • Mortati, C. (1975). Le forme di governo. Padova: Cedam.
  • Mortati, C. (1998). La costituzione in senso materiale. Milano: Giuffré.
  • Öniş, Z. and Senses, F. (2005). Rethinking the emerging post-Washington Consensus. Development and Change, 36 (2), 263-290. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00411.x.
  • Pernice, I. (2015). Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe. European Constitutional Law Review, 11 (3), 541-562. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019615000279.
  • Pochet, Ph. (2022). From one crisis to another: changes in the governance of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 28 (1), 119-133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221084582.
  • Pulliam, S., Kelly, K. and Mollenkamp, C. (2010). Hedge funds try ‘career trade’ against euro. Walt Street Journal, 26-02-2010. Available at: https://bit.ly/41d7x1w.
  • Pureza, J. M. and Mortágua, M. (2016). The European neoliberal order and the eurocrisis. Blame it all on Germany? World Review of Political Economy, 7 (3), 363-381. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.7.3.0363.
  • Ryner, M. (2019). The authoritariam neoliberalism of the EU: legal form and international politico-economic sources. In E. Nanopoulos and F. Vergis (eds.). The crisis behind the Eurocrisis: the Eurocrisis as a multidimensional systemic crisis of the EU (pp. 89-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108598859.005.
  • Roberts, M. (2021). Il dilemma dei banchieri centrali. Sinistrainrete. 24-12-2022. Available at: https://bit.ly/3o8obRF.
  • Saad-Filho, A. (2011). Crisis in Neoliberalism or Crisis of Neoliberalism? Socialist Register. The Crisis this Time, 47, 242-259.
  • Somma, A. (2017). Europa a due velocità. Postpolitica dell’Unione europea. Reggio Emilia: Imprimatur.
  • Somma, A. (2018). Sovranismi. Stato, popolo e conflitto sociale. Roma: DeriveApprodi.
  • Somma, A. (2021). Il mercato delle riforme. Come l´Europa é divenuta un dispositivo neoliberale irriformabile. In E. Mostacci and A. Somma (eds.). Dopo le crisi. Dialoghi sull futuro dell´Europa (pp. 229-240). Roma: Rogas.
  • Springer, S. (2015). Postneoliberalism? Review of Radical Political Economics, 47 (1), 5-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613413518724.
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1990). Symposium on Bubbles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4 (2), 13-18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.2.13.
  • Streeck, W. (2017). ¿Cómo terminará el capitalismo? Ensayos sobre un sistema en decadencia. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
  • Šumonja, S. (2021). Neoliberalism is not dead. On political implications of Covid-19. Capital and Class, 45 (2), 215-227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816820982381.
  • Talani, L. S. (2016). The European crisis: between the global financial crisis and the structural imbalances of the EMU. In L. S. Talani (eds.). European in crisis. A structural analysis (pp. 11-35). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1- 137-57707-8.
  • Tesche, T. (2021). Pandemic politics: the European Union in times of the coronavirus emergency. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60 (2), 480-496. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1111/jcms.13303.
  • Van Apeldoorn, B. and De Graaff, N. (2022). The state in global capitalism before and after the Covid-19 crisis. Contemporary Politics, 28 (3), 306-327. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1080/13569775.2021.2022337.
  • Weiss, L. (1997). Globalisation and the myth of the powerless state. New Left Review, 225, 1-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711732.
  • Wills, J. (2017). Contesting World Order? Socioeconomic Rights and Global Justice Movements. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781316809921.
  • Zagrebelsky, G. (2018). El Derecho dúctil. Ley, derechos, justicia. Madrid: Trotta.
  • Zolea, R. (2022). La BCE sta neutralizzando i tassi negativi? Economiaepolitica. Rivista Online di Critica della Politica Economica, 16-3-2022. Available at: https://bit.ly/43u4bJi.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet