La política del antropoceno. Hacia un fundamento común de las responsabilidades planetarias

  1. Martínez de Bringas, Asier
Aldizkaria:
Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos

ISSN: 1133-0937

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Zenbakia: 49

Orrialdeak: 115-152

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.20318/DYL.2023.7721 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos

Laburpena

We will structure this work in four fundamental moments. A first moment, where we will expose different narratives of the Anthropocene. All of them start from different epistemological assumptions and approach different political proposals to think about the alternatives. We will also propose how we understand the Anthropocene and what potential it holds for thinking about transitions. In a second moment, we will talk about the ambivalence of the Anthropocene, that new condition that gives the human being the ability to bea geological force which implies an unprecedented power, but ambivalent, to the extent that it may imply its own destruction. The conscious understanding of the status of this ambivalence is a condition for the possibility of beginning to think about responsibilities in a different way. In a third moment, we will proposethe figure of the decentered anthropos as a symbolic expression to perceive, both the importance of the human being to think about other ways of living and transiting, as well as to apprehend the radical vulnerability that characterizes us, a necessary condition to think about any form of responsibility. We will layspecial emphasis on “biocentric paradigm”, as a place from which to enunciate the criticism of “anthropocentric paradigm”, its demands and proposals. Finally, and in a more proactive way, we will try to formulate the normative foundations of the responsibility(es) in the Anthropocene, starting from the moral universe that the ecosystemic fracture with which we live shows us. 

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • NAREDO, J.M., La crítica agotada. Claves para un cambio de civilización, Siglo XXI, Madrid, 2022, p. 13.
  • C. HAMILTON, “The Theodicy of the “Good Anthropocene”, Environmental Humanities, vol. 7, 2015, pp. 233-238
  • ARIAS-MALDONADO, “¿Towards a good Anthropocene?”, in ARIAS MALDONADO and Z. TRACHTENBERG, Rethinking the Environment for the Anthropocene. Political Theory and Socionatural Relations in the New Geological Epoch, Trachtenberg, Routledge, NY, 2019, pp. 137-150.
  • T. LENTON, Earth system science: a very short introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016, pp. 40 y ss.
  • J. DAVIES, The Birth of Anthropocene, UCP, California, p. 42.
  • B. LATOUR, Cara a cara con el Planeta. Una nueva mirada sobre el cambio climático alegada de posiciones apocalípticas, Siglo XXI, Argentina, 2017, p. 65
  • ARIAS-MALDONADO, “¿Bedrock or social construction? What Anthropocene science means for political theory”, The Anthropocene Review 2020, vol. 7 núm. 2, p. 105.
  • P.J. CRUTZEN, “Geology of Mankind”, Nature, 3 de enero de 2002, p. 23.
  • L. SEMAL, “Anthropocene, Catastrophism and Green Political Theory” in C. HAMILTON et. al. (ed), The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis. Rethinking Modernity en a new Epoch, Routledge, New York, 2015, pp. 87-99.
  • D. CHAKRABARTY, “Quelques failles dans la pensé du changement climatique”, en E. HACHE (comp), De l´univers clos au mondé infini, Editions Dehors, Paris, 2014, p. 146.
  • P. J. CRUTZEN, “Geology of Mandkind”, Nature, vol. 415, núm. 23, 2002
  • STEFFEN et al., “The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, núm. 369, 2011, pp. 842-867
  • STEFFEN et. al. “The Anthropocene: Are Humans now Overwhelming the great forces of Nature?”, Ambio núm. 36 vol. 8, 2011, pp. 614-621
  • D. CHAKRABARTY, “The Climate of History: Four Theses, Critical Inquiry núm. 35, 2009, pp. 197-222
  • D. CHAKRABARTY,“The Anthropocene and the Convergence of Histories”, in The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis, cit., pp. 44-56
  • A.HORNBORG, Global Ecology and Unequal Exchange, Routledge, London, 2013, pp. 40 y ss.
  • M. WISSENBURG, “Geo-engineering: A Curse or a Blessing” in Rethinking the Environment for the Anthropocene, cit., pp. 153-165.
  • B. LATOUR, Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into the Democracy, HUP, Cambridge, 2004
  • D. HARAWAY, Seguir con el problema. Generar parentesco en el Chthuluceno, Cosonni, Bilbao, 2020, pp. 59-99
  • B. MORIZOT, Maneras de estar vivo. La crisis ecológica global y las políticas de lo salvaje, Errata Naturae, Madrid, 2021, pp. 13-44
  • M. ARIAS MALDONADO, Antropoceno. La política en la era humana, Taurus, Madrid, 2018, 2020, 2021
  • A FREMAUX, “Return of Nature in the Capitalocene. A critique of the ecomodernist version of Good Anthropocene” in ARIAS-MADONADO and Z. TRACHTENBERG, Rethinking the Environment for the Anthropocene, cit., pp. 19-36.
  • D. BARNOSKY et. al., “Approaching a State Shift in Earth’s Biosphere”, Nature, núm. 486, 2012, pp. 52-58
  • J. DIAMOND, Collapse: How Species Choose to Fail or Succeed, Viking Penguin, NY, 2005
  • R. HOPKINS, The Transition Handbook, Greenbooks, Foxhole, 2008
  • C. TAIBO, Decrecimiento Una propuesta razonada, Alianza, Madrid, 2021.
  • J. MOORE, Capitalism in the Web of Life, Verso, London, 2015.
  • R. GARCÍA, Sistemas complejos: Conceptos, método y fundamentación epistemológica de la investigación interdisciplinaria, Gedisa, Barcelona, 2006, pp. 82 y ss.
  • B. LATOUR, Dónde aterrizar. Cómo orientarse en política, Taurus, Barcelona, 2019, pp. 72 y ss.
  • J. LOVELOCK, Gaia. Una nueva visión de la vida sobe la tierra, Hermann Blue, Barcelona, 1983, pp. 51 y ss.
  • E. ELLIS,“Anthropogenic Transformation of the Terrestrial Biosphere”, Philosophical Transictions of the Royal Society, núm. 369, 2011, p. 1027.
  • R. G. IRVINE, “Deep time. An anthropological Problem”, Social Anthropology, núm. 22 vol. 2, 2014, pp. 157-172
  • M. ARIAS MALDONADO, Antropoceno. La política en la era humana, Taurus, Madrid, 2018, p. 115.
  • The Carbons Majors, 2017. Disponible en https://georka.es/georka-sistemas-de-gestion/ carbon-majors-informe-2017.
  • E. KOLBERT, La sexta extinción. Una historia nada natural, Crítica, Barcelona, 2014.
  • M. SVAMPA, “El Antropoceno como diagnóstico y paradigma. Lecturas globales desde el Sur”, Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, núm. 84, 2019, pp. 35-36.
  • CRUTZEN y STOERMER “The Antrophocene”, IGBP Global Change Newslater, núm. 41, 2000, 17-18.
  • B. LATOUR, J. LLOYD y L. VOLOKHONSKY, “Agency at the time of the anthropo-cene”, New Literary History, núm. 45 vol. 1, 2014, pp. 1-18.
  • E. GUDYNAS, Derechos de la naturaleza. Ética biocéntrica y políticas ambientales, Tinta Limón, Buenos Aires, 2015, pp. 41 y ss.
  • J. O`NEILL, Ecology, Policy and Politics. Human Well-Being and the Natural World, Routledge, London, pp. 20 y ss.
  • N. AGAR, Life`s Intrinsic Value. Sciencie, Ethics and Nature, CUP, New York, pp. 57 y ss.
  • B. BRADLEY, “Intrinsic Value” in H. LAFOLLETTE (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Blackwell, Oxford, 2013, pp. 2770-2779.
  • A. NAESS y G. SESSIONS, “Basic principles of Deep Ecology”, in B. DEVALL et al., Deep Ecology: living as if Nature Mattered, Smith, Salt Lake City, 1985, pp. 69-73.
  • J. B. CALLICOTT, “En busca de una ética ambiental” en T. KWIAKOWSKA et. al., Los caminos de la ética ambiental, Plaza y Valdés, Conacyt, 1998, pp. 85-159
  • J. B. CALLICOTT, “Non Anthropocentric Value Theory and Environmental Ethics, American Philosophical Quaterly, núm. 21 vol. 4, 1984, pp. 299-309.
  • J. B. CALLICOTT, “En busca de una ética ambiental”, cit.; J. B. CALLICOTT, In Defense of the Land Ethic: essays in environmental Philosophy, Suny Press, Albany, 1989.
  • M. E. SOULÉ, “What is Conservation Biology?, BioScience, núm. 35 vol. 11, 1985, pp. 727-734
  • M. E. SOULÉ, , Conservation Biology. The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Sinauer, Sunderland, 1986
  • E. GUDYNAS, Derechos de la naturaleza. Ética biocéntrica y políticas ambientales, Tinta Limón, Buenos Aires, 2015, pp. 266 y ss.
  • KNIGHT y S. RIEDEL, Aldo Leopold and the Ecological Conscience, OUP, New York, 2002, pp. 82 y ss.
  • H. ROLSTON, Philosophy Gone Wild. Essays in Environmental Ethics, Prometheus, Bufalo, 1986
  • A. ESCOBAR, Sentipensar con la tierra. Nuevas lecturas sobre desarrollo, territorio y diferencia, Unaula, Medellín, 2016, pp. 145-148.
  • G. GAARD, “Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism”, Feminist Formations, núm. 23 vol. 2, 2011, pp. 26-53.
  • A. ESCOBAR, “Sentipensar con la tierra: luchas territoriales y la dimensión ontológica de las epistemologías del Sur”, en B. DE SOUSA SANTOS y P. MENESES Conocimientos nacidos en las luchas. Construyendo las epistemologías del Sur, Akal, México, 2020, p. 176.
  • J. ESTERMANN, Filosofía andina. Sabiduría indígena para un nuevo mundo, Iseat, La Paz, 2009
  • D. BOLLIER, Pensar desde los comunes. Una breve introducción, Madrid, Traficantes de sueños, Madrid, 2016
  • A.ACOSTA, Buen Vivir Sumak Kawsay. Una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos, Abya Yala, Quito, 2012
  • M. SVAMPA, Las fronteras del neo-extractivismo en América Latina. Conflictos socio ambientales, giro eco territorial y nuevas dependencias, Universidad de Guadalajara, México, 2018
  • E. GUDYNAS, Extractivismos. Ecología, economía y política de un modo de entender el desarrollo y la naturaleza, Cedib, Bolivia, 2015
  • B. SANTOS, El fin del imperio cognitivo. La afirmación de las epistemologías del Sur, Trotta, Madrid, 2019).
  • J. SCHMIDT, P. BROWN and CH. ORR, “Ethics in the Anthropocene: a Research Agenda”, The Anthropocene Review, 2016, vol. 3 núm.3, p. 190.
  • G. SPIVAK, An Aesthetic Eudaction in the Era of Globalisation, HUP, Cambridge, 2012, p. 338.
  • D. CHAKRABARTY, “The anthropocene and The convergence of Histories”, in The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis, cit., pp. 44-56.
  • W. BROWN, En las ruinas del neoliberalismo. El ascenso de las políticas antidemocráticas en Occidente, Traficantes de Sueños, Madrid, 2021, pp. 88 y ss. iii
  • C. PELLUCHON, Reparemos el mundo. Humanos, animales, naturaleza, Ned, Madrid, 2022, p. 128.
  • S. MARKS, “Human rights and root causes”, The Modern Law Review, 74 vol. 1, 2011, pp. 57-78.
  • SVAMPA, Las fronteras del neo-extractivismo en América Latina. Conflictos socio ambientales, giro eco territorial y nuevas dependencias, Universidad de Guadalajara, México, 2018.
  • A. FREMAUX, “Return of Nature in the Capitalocene. A critique of the ecomodernist versión of Good Anthropocene” in Rethinking the Environment for the Anthropocene, pp. 19-36.
  • ARIAS-MALDONADO, “Reformulating emancipation in the Anthropocene: From didactic apocalypse to planetary subjectivities”, European Journal of Social Theory, 2022, vol. 25 núm. 1, pp. 136–154.
  • G.C. DAILY, Nature`s Services: societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press, Washington, 2007, pp. 55 y ss.
  • F. GUATTARI, Las tres ecologías, Pre-Textos, Valencia, 2005.
  • P. G. BROWN and G. GARVER, Right Relationship: Building a Whole Earth Economy, Berrett-Koehlers Publishers, San Francisco, 2009.
  • T. MITCHELL, Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil, Verso, London, 2011.
  • Z. TRACHTENBERG, “The Ecological circunstances of politics” in Rethinking the Environment for the Anthropocene. Political Theory and Socionatural Relations in the New Geological Epoch, MALDONADO and Z. TRACHTENBERG, Routledge, NY, 2019, pp. 85 y ss.
  • J. SCHMIDT, et. al., “Ethics in the Anthropocene: a Research Agenda”, The Anthropocene Review, 2016, vol. 3 núm. 3, p. 191.
  • E. GUDYNAS, Derechos de la naturaleza. Ética biocéntrica y políticas ambientales, Tinta Limón, Buenos Aires, 2015, p. 295.
  • P. G. BROWN, Ethics for Economics in the Anthropocene, American Teilhard Association, New York, 2012, pp. 40 y ss
  • M. SMITH, Against Ecological Sovereignty: Ethics, Biopolitics, and Saving the Natural World, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2011.
  • M. GARCES, Un mundo común, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 2013, p. 15.
  • J. RIECHMANN, Un mundo vulnerable. Ensayos sobre ecología, ética y tecnociencia, Catarata, Madrid, 2000, pp. 60 y ss.
  • J. TRONTO, Who Cares? How to Reshape a Democratic Politics, CUP, Ithaca&London, 2015.
  • J. BUTLER, Marcos de guerra. Vidas lloradas, Paidós, Barcelona, 2009, p. 71.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet