Does distance really matter? Assessing the impact of KIBS proximity on firms’ servitization capacityevidence from the Basque country

  1. Opazo Basáez, Marco 1
  2. Narvaiza Cantín, Lorea 1
  3. Campos, Jose Antonio 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

Revista:
Investigaciones Regionales = Journal of Regional Research

ISSN: 1695-7253,  2340-2717

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Territorial servitization

Número: 48

Páginas: 51-68

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.38191/IIRR-JORR.20.020 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Investigaciones Regionales = Journal of Regional Research

Resumen

La estrategia de servitización está siendo progresivamente reconocida a lo largo del mundo como una fuente clave de valor con importantes implicaciones competitivas y económicas. Se ha demostrado, entre otras cosas, que contribuye al desempeño territorial mediante la prestación de servicios a empresas manufactureras. No obstante, esta contribución se debe en gran parte a la configuración de las estructuras industriales locales, y lo que es más importante, a la interconexión entre empresas manufactureras y empresas de servicios empresariales intensivos en conocimiento (KIBS). En consecuencia, el proceso de servitización territorial está muy condicionado por la asociación entre empresas manufactureras y empresas KIBS. Hasta la fecha, la literatura sobre servitización territorial ha descrito principalmente las implicaciones de las empresas KIBS en el despliegue de servicios y la innovación de servicios en la manufactura, considerando el conocimiento y las capacidades tecnológicas las principales variables de su éxito. Sin embargo, la literatura es escasa o casi inexistente respecto de cómo la distancia geográfica entre las empresas KIBS y las empresas manufactureras puede afectar la capacidad de servitización. Por consiguiente, este documento tiene como objetivo plantear la importancia de la distancia geográfica de las empresas KIBS en la capacidad de servitización de los fabricantes. Para cumplir con este objetivo, proporciona el análisis de dos empresas manufactureras; Alfa y Beta. Ambas situadas en el País Vasco, pero en colaboración con firmas KIBS ubicadas en diferentes áreas geográficas, ya sea “dentro” o “fuera” del País Vasco. A través de un estudio cualitativo basado en (i) medir la capacidad de servitización de estas empresas y (ii) entrevistas en profundidad, los resultados sugieren que la distancia geográfica juega un papel clave en la relación empresa KIBS y la capacidad de servitización del fabricante, y debería ser considerada como un aspecto importante para el éxito de la servitización territorial.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alghisi, A., & Saccani, N. (2015). Internal and external alignment in the servitization journey–overcoming the challenges. Production Planning & Control, 26(14-15), 1219-1232.
  • Aranguren, M. J., De La Maza, X., Parrilli, M. D., Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Wilson, J. R. (2014). Nested methodological approaches for cluster policy evaluation: An application to the Basque Country. Regional Studies, 48(9), 1547-1562.
  • Basaez, M. O., Aranda, D. A., Djundubaev, R., & Montesinos, F. S. (2014). The Role of CRM‐ SRM Bolt‐ ons in Enterprise Resource Planning System: Toward a Customer‐ Oriented Supply Chain. Strategic Change, 23(5-6), 389-400.
  • Bustinza, O. F., Bigdeli, A. Z., Baines, T., & Elliot, C. (2015). Servitization and competitive advantage: the importance of organizational structure and value chain position. Research-Technology Management, 58(5), 53-60.
  • Bustinza, O.F., Gomes, E., Vendrell‐ Herrero, F., & Baines, T. (2019a). Product–service innovation and performance: the role of collaborative partnerships and R&D intensity. R&D Management, 49(1), 33-45.
  • Bustinza, O.F., Lafuente, E., Rabetino, R., Vaillant, Y., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2019b). Make-or-buy configurational approaches in product-service ecosystems and performance. Journal of Business Research, 104, 393-401.
  • Bustinza, O. F., Vendrell-Herrero, F., Gomes, E., Lafuente, E., Opazo-Basáez, M., Rabetino, R., & Vaillant, Y. (2018). Product-service innovation and performance. International journal of business environment, 10(2), 95-111.
  • Castellón-Orozco, H., Jaría Chacón, N., & Guitart Tarrés, L. (2019). La adopción de la estrategia de servitización en las empresas manufactureras españolas: un análisis espacial por comunidades autónomas. Investigaciones Regionales, 45, 39-53.
  • Cavaye, A. L. (1996). Case study research: a multi‐ faceted research approach for IS. Information systems journal, 6(3), 227-242.
  • Coreynen, W., Matthyssens, P., & Gebauer, H. (2018). Are you ready for servitization? A tool to measure servitization capacity. In M. Kohtamäki, T. Baines, R. Rabetino & A.Z. Bigdeli (Eds.), Practices and Tools for Servitization (pp. 25-39). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-76517-4
  • Cusumano, M. A., Kahl, S. J., & Suarez, F. F. (2015). Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 559-575.
  • Einola, S., Rabetino, R., & Luoto, S. (2016). Paradoxes in servitization. In Proceedings of Academy of Management 2016, 1, 17388. NY. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.17388abstract
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32.
  • European Commission (2007). Towards a European Strategy in Support of Innovation in Services: Challenges and Key Issues for Future Actions. Commission Staff Working Document, SEC 1059. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/- /publication/42b7e6b4-d7c8-4ae4-b13d-13305a9c6686
  • European Commission (2011). Knowledge-Intensive (Business) Services in Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovationunion/pdf/knowledge_intensive_business_services_in_europe_2011.pdf
  • European Commission (2019). Regional Innovation Monitor Plus. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/toolsdatabases/regional-innovation-monitor/base-profile/basque-country. Last access: 29-9-2019.
  • Frank, A. G., Mendes, G. H., Ayala, N. F., & Ghezzi, A. (2019). Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 341-351.
  • Galera-Zarco, C., Morales-Gallego, M., & Pérez-Aróstegui, M. N. (2014). Servitization in Project‐ Based Firms. Strategic Change, 23(5-6), 329-340.
  • Gebauer, H., Fleisch, E., & Friedli, T. (2005). Overcoming the service paradox in manufacturing companies. European Management Journal, 23(1), 14-26.
  • Gomes, E., Bustinza, O. F., Tarba, S., Khan, Z., & Ahammad, M. (2019). Antecedents and implications of territorial servitization. Regional Studies, 53(3), 410-423.
  • Grandinetti, R. (2011). Local/global cognitive interfaces within industrial districts: an Italian case study. The Learning Organization, 18(4), 301-312.
  • Growe, A. (2019). Developing trust in face-to-face interaction of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS). Regional Studies, 53(5), 720-730. https://www.orkestra.deusto.es/competitividadcapv/imgs/informes/2015-orkestra-informecompetitividad.pdf
  • Hu, T. S. (2017). Developments in interactive relationships and knowledge between KIBS firms and their clients in Taiwan. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(2), 257-271.
  • Kamp, B., & Ruiz de Apodaca, I. (2017). Are KIBS beneficial to international business performance: Evidence from the Basque Country. Competitiveness Review, 27(1), 80-95.
  • Kamp, B., & Alcalde, H. (2014). Servitization in the basque economy. Strategic Change, 23(5-6), 359- 374.
  • Lafuente, E., Leiva, J. C., Moreno-Gómez, J., & Szerb, L. (2020). A non-parametric analysis of competitiveness efficiency: The relevance of firm size and the configuration of competitive pillars. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 23 (3), 203-216.
  • Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Leiva, J. C. (2018). Sustainable and traditional product innovation without scale and experience, but only for KIBS!. Sustainability, 10(4), 1169.
  • Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Serarols, C. (2010). Location decisions of knowledge-based entrepreneurs: why some Catalan KISAs choose to be rural?. Technovation, 30(11-12), 590-600.
  • Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2017). Territorial servitization: Exploring the virtuous circle connecting knowledge-intensive services and new manufacturing businesses. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 19-28.
  • Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2019). Territorial servitization and the manufacturing renaissance in knowledge based economies. Regional Studies, 53(3), 313–319.
  • Lenka, S., Parida, V., Sjödin, D. R., & Wincent, J. (2018). Towards a multi-level servitization framework: Conceptualizing ambivalence in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(3), 810-827.
  • Liu, Y., Lattemann, C., Xing, Y., & Dorawa, D. (2019). The emergence of collaborative partnerships between knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) and product companies: the case of Bremen, Germany. Regional Studies, 53(3), 376-387.
  • Lockström, M., Schadel, J., Harrison, N., Moser, R., & Malhotra, M. K. (2010). Antecedents to supplier integration in the automotive industry: a multiple-case study of foreign subsidiaries in China. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 240-256.
  • Maffei, M. J., & Meredith, J. (1995). Infrastructure and flexible manufacturing technology: theory development. Journal of Operations Management, 13(4), 273-298.
  • Meredith, J. (1998). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of operations management, 16(4), 441-454.
  • Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research policy, 30(9), 1501-1516.
  • OECD (2001). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2001 – Towards a Knowledge Based Economy, Paris: OECD.
  • OECD, E. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris 2005, Sp, 46.
  • Opazo-Basáez, M., Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Bustinza, O. F. (2018). Uncovering productivity gains of digital and green servitization: Implications from the automotive industry. Sustainability, 10(5), 1524.
  • Opazo-Basáez, M., Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Bustinza, O. F. (2019). Talent for services: How gaining access to talent enables successful servitization. In Y. Liu (Ed.), Research Handbook of International Talent Management (35–59). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437105
  • Orkestra (2013). Informe de competitividad del País Vasco. Orkestra/San Sebastián. https://www.orkestra.deusto.es/es/investigacion/publicaciones/informes/informe-competitividadpais-vasco/215-informe-competitividad-pais-vasco-2013
  • Orkestra (2015). Informe de competitividad del País Vasco Orkestra/San Sebastian.
  • Rabetino, R., Harmsen, W., Kohtamäki, M., & Sihvonen, J. (2018). Structuring servitization-related research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 350-371.
  • Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., & Gebauer, H. (2017). Strategy map of servitization. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 144-156.
  • Sánchez‐ Montesinos, F., Opazo Basáez, M., Arias Aranda, D., & Bustinza, O. F. (2018). Creating isolating mechanisms through digital servitization: The case of Covirán. Strategic Change, 27(2), 121-128.
  • Strambach, S. (2008). Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) as drivers of multilevel knowledge dynamics. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 10(2-4), 152-174.
  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.
  • Valtakoski, A. (2017). Explaining servitization failure and deservitization: A knowledge-based perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 138-150.
  • Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), 314-324.
  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
  • Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Wilson, J. R. (2017). Servitization for territorial competitiveness: Taxonomy and research agenda. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 27(1), 2-11.
  • Vendrell-Herrero, F., Bustinza, O. F., & Opazo-Basaez, M. (2020). Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure. Journal of Business Research. In Press.
  • Vendrell-Herrero, F., Bustinza, O. F., Parry, G., & Georgantzis, N. (2017). Servitization, digitization and supply chain interdependency. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 69-81.
  • Vendrell-Herrero, F., Darko, C. K., & Ghauri, P. (2019). Knowledge management competences, exporting and productivity: uncovering African paradoxes. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0433
  • Vendrell‐ Herrero, F., Parry, G., Bustinza, O. F., & O'Regan, N. (2014). Servitization as a driver for organizational change. Strategic Change, 23(5-6), 279-285.
  • Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28(1), 63–80.
  • Visnjic, I., Wiengarten, F., & Neely, A. (2016). Only the brave: Product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 36-52.
  • Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740-762.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet