Predictors of Reading and Spelling Words Change as a Function of Syllabic Structure in Spanish

  1. Naroa Martínez
  2. Edurne Goikoetxea
Revista:
Psicología educativa

ISSN: 1135-755X

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 26

Número: 1

Páginas: 37-48

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicología educativa

Resumen

Investigamos los predictores longitudinales de la lectura y escritura de palabras y pseudopalabras con diferente estructura silábica en una ortografía transparente. Participaron 47 menores de 3º de Educación Infantil a 2º de Educación Primaria cuya lengua materna era el español. Al principio y al final del año escolar se evaluó el conocimiento de las letras, el conocimiento fonológico y la denominación rápida automatizada y al principio del año siguiente se evaluaron las habilidades de lectura y escritura. Los análisis de regresión múltiple jerárquica revelaron que el conocimiento de las letras fue el predictor más fuerte de la lectura y la escritura de palabras y pseudopalabras con sílabas simples después de 6 y 12 meses. El conocimiento fonológico predijo la lectura y escritura de estímulos con sílabas complejas. El análisis de mediación confirmó el papel mediador del conocimiento fonológico en la relación entre el conocimiento de las letras y la lectura y escritura con estímulos silábicos complejos. Esta investigación proporciona evidencia longitudinal de que la estructura silábica determina el papel del conocimiento de las letras y el conocimiento fonológico en las habilidades de lectura y escritura en español. Comprender qué conocimientos son esenciales para aprender a leer y escribir puede conducir al perfeccionamiento de métodos y materiales de alfabetización en lengua española.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Funding: This work was supported by the Basque Government under Grants BFI-2011-399 and IT955-16.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Aguilar, M., Guzmán, J. I. N., Jiménez, I. M., Cuevas, C. A., Consejero, E. M., & Olivier, P. R. (2010). Velocidad de nombrar y conciencia fonológica en el aprendizaje inicial de la lectura. Psicothema, 22, 436-442.
  • Baker, D. L., Cummings, K. D., Good, R. H., & Smolkowski, K. (2007). Indicadores dinámicos del éxito en la lectura (IDEL®): Summary of decision rules for intensive, strategic, and benchmark instructional recommendations in kindergarten through third grade (Technical Report No. 1). Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group.
  • Bravo-Valdivieso, L., Villalón, M., & Orellana, E. (2003). Predictividad del rendimiento de la lectura: el segundo año básico. Psykhé, 12, 29-36.
  • Bravo-Valdivieso, L., Villalón, M., & Orellana, E. (2006). Predictibilidad del rendimiento en la lectura: una investigación de seguimiento entre primer y tercer año. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38, 9-20.
  • Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Málková, G. S., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398-1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612473122
  • Carrillo, M. (1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition. Reading and Writing, 6, 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01027086
  • Carroll, J. M. (2004). Letter knowledge precipitates phoneme segmentation, but not phoneme invariance. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 212- 225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00228.x
  • Casillas, Á., & Goikoetxea, E. (2007). Sílaba, principio-rima y fonema como predictores de la lectura y la escritura tempranas. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 30, 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037007780705184
  • Castells, N. & Solé, I. (2013). Early literacy development in Catalan: Characteristics and instructional influence. Da Investigação às Práticas, 3(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.25757/invep.v3i1.25
  • Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77-111. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00164-1
  • Corral, S., Ferrero, M., & Goikoetxea, E. (2009). LEXIN: A lexical database from Spanish kindergarten and first-grade readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 41, 1009-1017. https://doi. org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1009
  • Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R: batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores de los niños de educación primaria revisada [Reading processes assessment battery of children in primary education reviewed]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.
  • Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51-62.
  • Defior, S., Jiménez-Fernández, G., & Serrano, F. (2009). Complexity and lexicality effects on the acquisition of Spanish spelling. Learning and Instruction, 19, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.01.005
  • Duncan, L. G., Castro, S. L., Defior, S., Seymour, P. H., Baillie, S., Leybaert, J., ... Lund, R. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cognition.2013.02.009
  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). PPVT-III PEABODY Test de vocabulario en imágenes [Picture Vocabulary Test]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.
  • Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
  • Ellis, N. C., & Hooper, A. M. (2001). Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 571-599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716401004052
  • Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1979) Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño. México, DF: Siglo XXI.
  • Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18, 129-155. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
  • Frost, R. (2012). A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: Not only possible, but also inevitable. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 310-329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000635
  • Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 566-580. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.566
  • Georgiou, G. K., Torppa, M., Manolitsis, G., Lyytinen, H., & Parrila, R. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25, 321- 346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
  • Goikoetxea, E. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18, 51-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-1955-7
  • Goikoetxea, E., & Martínez, N. (2014). PRELEO test de lectura y escritura para prelectores y lectores principiantes en español y euskera (prepublished version).
  • Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & de Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010560
  • Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2011.00054
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press
  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 45-66). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
  • Kim, Y. S., & Pallante D. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0
  • Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.100.1.150
  • Liberman, I. Y. (1973). Segmentation of the spoken word and reading acquisition. Annals of Dyslexia, 23, 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02653842
  • Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M., & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia—early identification and prevention: Highlights from the Jyväskylä longitudinal study of dyslexia. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2, 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-015- 0067-1
  • Maddieson, I. (2013). Syllable structure. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from http://wals.info/chapter/12
  • Mann, V., & Wimmer, H. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653-682. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020984704781
  • Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026744
  • Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(79)90020-9
  • Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2005). Literacy and cognitive change. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 188-203). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https:// www.oecd-il ibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volumev_9789264285521-en
  • Phillips, B. M., Piasta, S. B., Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., & Francis, D. J. (2012). IRTs of the ABCs: Children’s letter name acquisition. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 461-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.05.002
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
  • Real Academia Española RAE. (2010). Ortografía de la lengua española [Orthography of the Spanish language]. Madrid, Spain: Espasa.
  • Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (5th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
  • Schmalz, X., Marinus, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614-1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
  • Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & COST Action A8 (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. Bristish Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859
  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218. https://doi. org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
  • Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584-615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.134.4.584
  • Speece, D. L., Mills, C., Ritchey, K. D., & Hillman, E. (2003). Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill. Journal of Special Education, 36, 223-233. https://doi. org/10.1177/002246690303600403
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Cognitive science meets beginning reading. Psychological Science, 2, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991. tb00103.x
  • Suárez-Coalla, P., García de Castro, M., & Cuetos, F. (2013). Variables predictoras de la lectura y la escritura en castellano. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037013804826537
  • Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2003). The role of letter names in the acquisition of literacy. In H. W. Reese & R. Kail (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 31, pp. 105-135). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Wolf, M., & Denckla, M. B. (2005). RAN/RAS: Rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., .... Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading a cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551- 559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406
  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dislexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29. https://doi. org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet