Inspira STEAMbreaking the confidence gap with female roles

  1. Guenaga Gómez, Mariluz
  2. Fernández Álvarez, Lorena
Journal:
Investigaciones feministas

ISSN: 2171-6080

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Metodologías Feministas: nuevas perspectivas

Volume: 11

Issue: 2

Pages: 273-286

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/INFE.65836 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Investigaciones feministas

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Following women’s careers in STEAM can be compared to a leaking pipeline, which leaks in so many ways that, in the end, it is empty before it reaches leading professional positions. However, even before, girls do not opt for STEAM studies, and one of the main reasons is their lack of confidence: both self-confidence and trust in other people. Girls see the potential of women in many fields, but when asked directly, they do not see themselves as able to be good scientists or technologists. This lack of confidence is what we found in the Inspira STEAM project, aimed at increasing the interest in STEAM of girls in primary education and promoting scientific and technological careers.  The project consisted of six one-hour sessions following group mentoring methodology at school-hours carried out by female professionals in STEAM as close reference models. Mentors were trained in the methodology, gender perspective and materials developed for the sessions. After completing the program girls, boys and mentors completed a questionnaire about their experience. Results show great satisfaction of participants with the program but less self-confidence in the performance of mentors. Also, girls show high confidence in what women are able to achieve, but not so much in what they, personally, can achieve related to science and technology. These results have great relevance to understanding the confidence gap and figuring out how to close it.

Bibliographic References

  • Babcock, L., Laschever, S., Gelfand, M., & Small, D. (2003). Nice girls don’t ask. Harvard Business Review, 81(10), 14-16. Available at: https://hbr.org/2003/10/nice-girls-dont-ask
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
  • Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating Hybrid Spaces for Engaging School Science Among Urban Middle School Girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
  • Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K., & Haller, S. (2003). Gender differences in computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.611930
  • Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389-391. DOI: 10.1126/science.aah6524 Available at: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6323/389
  • Clark Blickenstaff, J. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?. Gender and education, 17(4), 369-386.
  • Clark, N. (2014). Act Now To Shrink The Confidence Gap - Forbes. Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/womensmedia/2014/04/28/act-now-to-shrink-the-confidence-gap/
  • Cohoon, J. M. (2002). Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543829
  • Crosnoe, R., Riegle‐Crumb, C., Field, S., Frank, K., & Muller, C. (2008). Peer group contexts of girls’ and boys’ academic experiences. Child Development, 79(1), 139-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01116.x
  • Dar-Nimrod, I., and Heine, S. J. (2006). Exposure to scientific theories affects women's math performance. Science, 314(5798), 435-435. DOI: 10.1126/science.1131100
  • Dresel, M., Schober, B., and Ziegler, A. (2007). Golem und “Pygmalion. Scheitert die Chancengleichheit von Mädchen im mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Bereich am geschlechtsstereotypen Denken der Eltern?,” in Erwartungen in Himmelblau und Rosarot. Effekte, Determinanten und Konsequenzen von Geschlechterdifferenzen in der Schule, eds P. H. Ludwig and H. Ludwig (Weinheim: Juventa), 61–81.
  • Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D. (2003). How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(1), 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.5
  • Engström, S. (2018). Differences and similarities between female students and male students that succeed within higher technical education: profiles emerge through the use of cluster analysis. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9374-z
  • Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Can schools narrow the Black–White test score gap? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black–White test score gap (p. 318–374). Brookings Institution Press.
  • Howard, L. W., Tang, T. L. P., & Austin, M. J. (2015). Teaching critical thinking skills: Ability, motivation, intervention, and the Pygmalion effect. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 133-147.
  • Fisher, A., & Margolis, J. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543836
  • Simmons, D. (2016). Impostor syndrome, a reparative history. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, 106-127.
  • Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa, I.N.E.E. (2015). PISA 2015. http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/inee/evaluaciones-internacionales/pisa/pisa-2015.html
  • Lehman, K. J., Sax, L. J., & Zimmerman, H. B. (2017). Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique? Computer Science Education, 26(4), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1271536
  • Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262-265.
  • Kessels, U. (2015). Bridging the gap by enhancing the fit: How stereotypes about STEM clash with stereotypes about girls. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 280-296.
  • Régner, I., Selimbegović, L., Pansu, P., Monteil, J. M., & Huguet, P. (2016). Different sources of threat on math performance for girls and boys: the role of stereotypic and idiosyncratic knowledge. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00637
  • Robnett, R. D. (2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 65-79.
  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development 1968 New York Holt. Rinehart and Winston. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322211
  • Stake, J. E. (2006). The Critical Mediating Role of Social Encouragement for Science Motivation and Confidence Among High School Girls and Boys 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 1017-1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00053.x
  • Tech Nation Talent. (2018). Young people’s perceptions of tech careers in the UK. Retrieved 30 July 2019. Available at https://technation.io/news/young-peoples-perceptions-tech-careers-uk-tech-nation-talent-part-3/
Data source: Dialnet