La verdad en las democracias algorítmicas

  1. Daniel Innerarity 1
  2. Carme Colomina 2
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  2. 2 Barcelona Centre for International Affairs
Revista:
Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals

ISSN: 2013-035X,  1133-6595

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Desinformación y poder: la crisis de los intermediarios

Número: 124

Páginas: 11-23

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24241/RCAI.2020.124.1.11 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Public conversation has been digitalised. The internet offers us a horizontal, decentralised space with superabundant content, while at the same time a process of disintermediation has accelerated, ending the monopoly of the traditional interpreters of reality. Information and opinion are mixed and confused and new content is hybridised. The perception of facts is mediated by emotions and truths are chosen freely. This transformation is explained not only by the crisis in traditional media systems, but also by the new algorithmic order that largely controls the selective predetermination of information. How is the democratic system affected by public debate taking place in privately owned technological spaces? Who controls this digitised space? The true existential challenge posed to democracy by the creation of new power systems and new social inequalities will be settled by datafication and algorithmic governance.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arendt, Hannah. Between past and future. Eight exercises in political thought. Nueva York: Penguin Books, 2006[1961].
  • Arias Maldonado, Manuel. «Informe sobre los ciegos. Genealogía de la posverdad». En: Ibañez, Jordi (ed). La era de la posverdad. Barcelona: Calambur, 2017, p. 65-77.
  • Baricco, Alessandro. The game. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2019.
  • Bayer, Judit; Bitiukova, Natalija; Bard, Petra; Szakács, Judit; Alemanno, Alberto y Uszkiewicz, Erik. «Disinformation and Propaganda – Impact on the Functioning of the Rule of Law in the EU and its Member States». HEC Paris Research Paper, n.º LAW-2019-1341 (2019) (en línea) https://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.3409279
  • Calvo, Patrici. «Democracia algorítmica: consideraciones éticas sobre la dataficación de la esfera pública». Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, n.º 74 (2019), p. 5-30.
  • Cassam, Quassim. Vices of the mind. From the intellectual to the political. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Flynn, DJ; Nyhan, Brendan y Reifler, Jason. «The Nature and origins of Misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics». Advances in Political Psychology, vol. 38, n.º S1 (2017), p. 127-150.
  • Frankfurt, Harry G. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
  • Harari, Noah Yuval. 21 lecciones para el siglo xxi. Barcelona: Debate, 2018.
  • Innerarity, Daniel. Una teoría de la democracia compleja. Gobernar en el siglo xxi. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg, 2020.
  • Kakutani, Michiko. La muerte de la verdad. Notas sobre la falsedad en la era Trump. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg, 2019.
  • Kavanagh, Jennifer y Rich, Michael D. Truth Decay. An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. Santa Mónica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2018.
  • Manin, Bernard. The principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • Parlamento Europeo. «Resolución de 23 de noviembre de 2016, sobre la comunicación estratégica de la UE para contrarrestar la propaganda de terceros en su contra (2016/2030(INI)». Parlamento Europeo, (2016) (en línea)
  • Rawls, John. Collected papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
  • Revel, Jean François. Comment les democracies finisent. París: Grasset, 1983.
  • Rorty, Richard. The priortity of democracy to philosophy, en Objectivity relativism and truth: Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • Scheidt, Mélanie. «The European Union versus External Disinformation Campaigns in the Midst of Information Warfare: Ready for the Battle?». College of Europe, EU Diplomacy Papers [working paper], (2019) (en línea)
  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. «Mass communication, personal communication and vote choice: The filter hypothesis of media influence in comparative perspective». British Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, n.º 2 (2003), p. 233-259.
  • Sloman, Steven A. y Fernbach, Philip. The knowledge illusion: Why we never think alone. Nueva York: Riverhead Books, 2017.
  • Thompson, Mark. Sin palabras. ¿Qué ha pasado con el lenguaje de la política? Barcelona: Debate, 2017.
  • Urbinati, Nadia. Democracy disfigured. Opinion, truth and the people. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.
  • Van Alstyne, Marshall y Brynjolfsson, Erik. Electronic Communities: Global Village or Cyberbalkans?». Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, (1997) (en línea) doi=10.1.1.72.3676
  • Vosoughi, Soroush; Roy, Deb y Aral, Sinan. «The spread of true and false news online». Science, vol. 359, n.º 6.380 (2018), p. 1.146-1.151.
  • Waisbord, Silvio. «The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics». Communication Research and Practice, vol. 4, n.º 1 (2018), p. 17-34
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet