¿Están las ciudades españolas adaptándose al cambio climático?

  1. Elisa SAINZ DE MURIETA 1
  2. Marta OLAZABAL 1
  3. Estíbaliz SANZ 1
  1. 1 BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change
    info

    BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change

    Lejona, España

Revista:
Papeles de economía española

ISSN: 0210-9107

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 163

Páginas: 160-178

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles de economía española

Resumen

Tras el Acuerdo de París y la incorporación de los compromisos nacionales en adaptación, la medición del progreso de esta última forma una importante parte de la agenda internacional en política climática. Mediante la monitorización de la adaptación, instituciones públicas y privadas pueden distribuir y priorizar sus inversiones de forma efectiva, evaluar la consecución de objetivos y desarrollar procesos de aprendizaje. En este artículo revisamos el progreso de la adaptación en 54 ciudades que representan el 17 por 100 de la población española. Hemos identificado once planes de adaptación al cambio climático, relativamente recientes. Hemos evaluado el proceso de planificación, identificando fortalezas, áreas de mejora y oportunidades. Los resultados proporcionan información relevante para procesos locales en estas ciudades, también sirviendo de ejemplo para otras urbes. Igualmente, este análisis puede ser utilizado a escalas superiores para identificar áreas de actuación prioritarias con el fin de cubrir necesidades de financiación o capacitación.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

El presente estudio se ha desarrollado con el apoyo de la Fundación Biodiversidad del Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica del Gobierno de España (Ayuda n.º CA_CC_2017). Elisa Sainz de Murieta agradece la financiación posdoctoral del Departamento de Educación del Gobierno Vasco (Ayuda n.º POS_2018_2_0027). Marta Olazabal dispone de financiación de AXA Research Fund (Id. 4771) y el Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) (Ayuda n.º IJCI2016-28835). El desarrollo de este estudio ha contado con el apoyo del Gobierno Vasco a través del programa BERC 2018-2021 y del Gobierno de España a través de la acreditación de BC3 como centro María de Maeztu (MDM-2017-0714).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W. y Tompkins,E. L. (2005). Adapting to climatechange: perspectives across scales.Glob. Environ. Change, 15, pp.75-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001
  • Anguelovski, I., Chu, E. y Carmin, J. (2014).Variations in approaches to urbanclimate adaptation: Experiences andexperimentation from the globalSouth. Glob. Environ. Change, 27, pp.156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.010
  • Araos, M., Berrang-Ford, L., Ford, J. D.,Austin, S. E., Biesbroek, R. y Lesnikowski,A. (2016). Climate changeadaptation planning in large cities:A systematic global assessment.Environ. Sci. Policy, 66, pp. 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.009
  • Averch enkova, A. y Bassi, S. (2016). Beyond the targets: assessing the political credibility of pledges for the Paris Agreement (Policy Brief). London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy.
  • Ba rne t t, J. y O’Ne i l l, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Glob. Environ. Change, 20, pp. 211-213.
  • Berrang-Ford, L., Biesbroek, R., Ford, J. D., Lesnikowski, A., Tanabe, A., Wang, F. M., Chen, C., Hsu, A., Hellmann, J. J., Pringle, P., Grecequet, M., Amado, J.-C., Huq, S., Lwasa, S. y Heymann, S. J. (2019). Tracking global climate change adaptation among governments. Nat. Clim. Change, 9, pp. 440-449. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41558-019-0490-0
  • Biesbroek, G. R., Klostermann, J. E. M.,Termeer, C. J. A. M. y Kabat, P. (2013).On the nature of barriers to climatechange adaptation. Reg. Environ.Change, 13, pp. 1119-1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y
  • Bulkeley, H. y Castán Broto, V. (2013).Government by experiment? Globalcities and the governing of climatechange: Government by experiment?Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 38, pp.361-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
  • Campos, I., Guerra, J., Gomes, J. F.,Sch midt, L., Alves, F., Vizinho, A. yLopes, G. P. (2017). Understandingclimate change policy and actionin Portuguese municipalities: Asurvey. Land Use Policy, 62, pp.68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.015
  • Champalle, C., Ford, J. D. y Sherman, M. (2015). Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptations in Canadian Arctic Communities. Sustainability, 7, pp. 9268-9292. https://doi. org/10.3390/su7079268
  • Chan, S., Falkner, R., Goldberg, M. yVan Asselt, H. (2016). Effectiveand geographically balanced? Anoutput-based assessment of nonstateclimate actions. Clim. Policy, 0,pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248343
  • Collins, K. y Ison, R. (2009). Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ. Policy Gov., 19, pp. 358-373. https://doi. org/10.1002/eet.523
  • Cos ens, B. A. (2013). Legitimacy,Adaptation, and Resilience inEcosystem Management. Ecol. Soc.,18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05093-180103
  • Craft, B. y Fisher, S. (2016). Measuring effective and adequate adaptation (Issue Paper). London: IIED.
  • De Gregorio, S., Olazabal, M., Salvia, M., Pietrapertosa, F., Olazabal, E., Geneletti, D. et al. (2015). Understanding How and Why Cities Engage with Climate Policy: An Analysis of Local Climate Action in Spain and Italy. TeMA - J. Land Use Mobil. Environ, pp. 23-46. https://doi. org/10.6092/1970-9870/3649
  • Eisenack, K. y Stecker, R. (2012). A framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 17, pp. 243-260. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11027-011-9323-9
  • Few, R., Brown, K. y Tompkins, E. L. (2007).Public participation and climatechange adaptation: avoiding theillusion of inclusion. Clim. Policy, 7,pp. 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637
  • Ford, J. D. y Berrang-Ford, L. (2016). The 4Cs of adaptation tracking: c o n s i s t e n c y , c o m p a r a b i l i t y , comprehensiveness, coherency. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 21, pp. 839-859. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11027-014-9627-7
  • Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Biesbroek, R.,Araos, M., Austin, S. E. y Lesnikowski,A. (2015). Adaptation tracking fora post-2015 climate agreement.Nat. Clim. Change, 5, pp. 967-969. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2744
  • Ford, J. D. y King, D. (2015). A framework for examining adaptation readiness. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 20, pp. 505-526. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11027-013-9505-8
  • Füs s e l, H.-M. (2007). Adaptationplanning for climate change:concepts, assessment approaches,and key lessons. Sustain. Sci., 2, pp.265-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0032-y
  • Galarraga, I., Sainz de Murieta, E. y França, J. (2017). Climate policy at the sub-national level. En: A. Averch enkova, S. Fankhauser y M. Nach many (eds.), Trends in Climate Change Legislation, pp. 143-174. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Georgeson, L., Maslin, M., Poessinouw,M. y Howard, S. (2016). Adaptationresponses to climate changediffer between global megacities.Nat. Clim. Change, 6, pp. 584-588. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2944
  • Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker,W. E. y Maat, J. (2013). Dynamicadaptive policy pathways: A methodfor crafting robust decisions fora deeply uncertain world. Glob.Environ. Change, 23, pp. 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006
  • Haasnoot, M., Van ’t Klooster, S. yVan Alphen, J. (2018). Designing amonitoring system to detect signalsto adapt to uncertain climate change.Glob. Environ. Change, 52, pp.273-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.003
  • Hale, T. (2016). «All Hands on Deck»: The Paris Agreement and Nonstate Climate Action. Glob. Environ. Polit., 16, pp. 12-22. https://doi. org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00362
  • Heidrich , O., Dawson, R. J., Reckien, D. y Walsh, C. L. (2013). Assessment of the climate preparedness of 30 urban areas in the UK. Clim. Change, 120, pp. 771-784. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10584-013-0846-9
  • Heidrich , O., Reckien, D., Olazabal, M.,Foley, A., Salvia, M., de GregorioHurtado et al. (2016). Nationalclimate policies across Europe andtheir impacts on cities strategies.J. Environ. Manage, 168, pp. 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.043
  • Hink e l, J. (2011). «Indicators ofvulnerability and adaptive capacity»:Towards a clarification of thescience–policy interface. Glob.Environ. Change, 21, pp. 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002
  • Hugh es, S, (2015). A meta-analysis of urban climate change adaptation planning in the U.S. Urban Climate, 14(Part 1), pp. 17-29. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.003
  • IPCC (2014). Summary for Policymakers. E: C. B Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J Mach , M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 1-32. Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., Van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., Sch oenefeld, J. J. et al. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat. Clim. Change, 5, pp. 977-982. https://doi. org/10.1038/nclimate2725
  • Juhola, S., Glaas, E., Linnér, B.-O. y Neset, T.-S. (2016). Redefining maladaptation. Environ. Sci. Policy, 55, Part 1, pp. 135-140. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.014
  • Kamperman, H. y Biesbroek, R. (2017). Measuring Progress on Climate Change Adaptation Policy by Dutch Water Boards. Water Resour. Manag., 31, pp. 4557-4570. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11269-017-1765-8
  • Kingsborough , A., Borgomeo, E. y Hall, J. W. (2016). Adaptation pathways in practice: Mapping options and trade-offs for London’s water resources. Sustain. Cities Soc., 27, pp. 386-397. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.013
  • Lesnikowski, A., Ford, J., Biesbroek, R., Berrang-Ford, L. y Heymann, S. J. (2016). National-level progress on adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change, 6, pp. 261-264. https://doi. org/10.1038/nclimate2863
  • Lesnikowski, A. C., Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Barrera, M., Berry, P.y Henderson, J. (2013). Nationallevelfactors affecting planned,public adaptation to healthimpacts of climate change. Glob.Environ. Change, 23, pp. 1153-1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.008
  • Lesnikowski, A. C., Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Paterson, J. A., Barrera, M.y Heymann, S. J. (2011). Adapting tohealth impacts of climate change:a study of UNFCCC Annex I parties.Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 044009.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044009
  • Lobell, D. B., Burke, M. B., Tebaldi, C., Mastrandrea, M. D., Falcon, W.P. y Naylor, R. L. (2008). Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Needs for Food Security in 2030. Science, 319, pp. 607-610. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.1152339
  • Magnan, A. K. y Ribera, T. (2016). Global adaptation after Paris. Science, 352, pp. 1280-1282. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.aaf5002
  • Markanday, A. y Galarraga, I.(2019). Acritical review of cost-benefit analysisfor climate change adaptation incities. Clim. Change Econ., 10,1950014. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007819500143
  • Markanday, A. (2014). Incorporating Climate Change into Adaptation Programmes and Project Appraisal: Strategies for uncertainty. En A. Markandya, I. Galarraga, E. Sainz de Murieta (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Economics of Climate Change Adaptation, pp. 97-119. Routledge.
  • Millard-Ball, A. (2012). Do city climate plans reduce emissions? J. Urban Econ., 71, pp. 289-311. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.12.004
  • Muchadenyika, D. y Williams, J. J. (2017). Politics and the practice of planning: The case of Zimbabwean cities. Cities, 63, pp. 33-40. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.022
  • Olazabal, M., De Gregorio, S., Olazabal, E., Pietrapertosa, F., Salvia, M., Geneletti, D. et al. (2014). How are Italian and Spanish Cities tackling climate change? A local comparative study. Bilbao: Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3).
  • Olazabal, M., Galarraga, I., Ford, J.,Sainz de Murieta, E. y Lesnikowski, A.(2019a). Are local climate adaptationpolicies credible? A conceptual andoperational assessment framework.Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev., 11, pp.277-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1583234
  • Olazabal, M., Gopegui, M. R. de, Tompkins,E. L., Venner, K. y Smith, R. (2019b).A cross-scale worldwide analysisof coastal adaptation planning.Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 124056.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5532
  • Pietrapertosa, F., Salvia, M., De GregorioHurtado, S., D’Alonzo, V., Church ,J.M., Geneletti et al. (2018). Urbanclimate change mitigation andadaptation planning: Are Italiancities ready? Cities, article inpress. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.009
  • Reckien, D., Flacke, J., Dawson, R. J., Heidrich , O., Olazabal, M., Foley, A. et al. (2014). Climate change response in Europe: what’s the reality? Analysis of adaptation and mitigation plans from 200 urban areas in 11 countries. Clim. Change, 122, pp. 331-340. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10584-013-0989-8
  • Reckien, D., Flacke, J., Olazabal, M. yHeidrich , O. (2015). The Influenceof Drivers and Barriers on UrbanAdaptation and Mitigation Plans–An Empirical Analysis of EuropeanCities. PLoS ONE, 10, e0135597.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135597
  • Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich , O.,Church , J. M., Pietrapertosa, F., DeGregorio-Hurtado, S. et al. (2018).How are cities planning to respondto climate change? Assessment oflocal climate plans from 885 cities inthe EU-28. J. Clean. Prod., 191, pp.207-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220
  • Ribeiro, M., Losenno, C., Dworak, T., Massey, E., Swart, R., Benzie, M. y Laaser, C. (2013). Design of guidelines for the elaboration of Regional Cl imate Change Adaptations Strategies (No. Tender DG ENV.G.1/ETU/2008/0093r). Vienna: European Commission - DG Environment..
  • Sainz de Murieta, E., Galarraga, I. y Sanz, M. J. (2018). COP23: Technical profile with relevant political support. DYNA Ing. E Ind., 93, pp. 22-24. https://doi.org/10.6036/8685
  • Sarzynski, A. (2015). Public participation, civic capacity, and climate change adaptation in cities. Urban Clim., Building Capacity for Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas 14, Part 1, pp. 52-67. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.08.002
  • Schw arze, R., Meyer, P., Markandya, A., Kedia, S., Maleki, D. y Lara, M. (2016). Economics, Finance, and the Private Sector (Chapter 7). En C. Rosenzweig, W. Solecki, P. Romero-Lankao, S. Mehrotra, S. Dhakal, S. A. Ibrahim (eds.), Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network (UCCRN), p. 225. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shi, L., Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., Aylett,A., Debats, J., Goh, K. et al. (2016).Roadmap towards justice in urbancl imate adaptation research.Nat. Clim. Change, 6, pp. 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2841
  • Smith, J. B. (1997). Setting priorities foradapting to climate change. Glob.Environ. Change, 7, pp. 251-264.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(97)00001-0
  • Stults, M. y Woodruff , S. C. (2017). Looking under the hood of local adaptation plans: shedding light on the actions prioritized to build local resilience to climate change. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 22, pp. 1249-1279. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11027-016-9725-9
  • Tompkins, E. L., Vincent, K., Nicholls, R. J. ySuckall, N. (2018). Documenting thestate of adaptation for the globalstocktake of the Paris Agreement.Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change,9, e545. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.545
  • UNFCCC, 2015. Acuerdo de París. Decisión CP/2015/L.9.
  • Weich selgartner, J. y Kas person, R.(2010). Barriers in the sciencepolicy-practice interface: Toward aknowledge-action-system in globalenvironmental change research.Glob. Environ. Change, 20, pp.266-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006
  • Woodruff , S. C. y Stults, M. (2016). Numerous strategies but limited implementation guidance in US local adaptation plans. Nat. Clim. Change, 6, pp. 796-802. https://doi. org/10.1038/nclimate3012
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet