Representacio(ns) del tercer sector i l’Administració Públicaconsells, taules, i altres formes de relació en l’espai públic. El cas de Guipúscoa

  1. Felix Arrieta Frutos 1
  2. Ainhoa Izaguirre Choperena 1
  3. Martin Zuñiga Ruiz de Loizaga 1
  1. 1 Universitat de Deusto, España
Aldizkaria:
RTS: Revista de treball social

ISSN: 0212-7210,  2339-6385

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Zenbakia: 215

Orrialdeak: 109-125

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.32061/RTS2019.215.07 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: RTS: Revista de treball social

Laburpena

The restructuring processes to which the European Welfare Systems are been subjected to place the Third Sector on a prominence position. In this sense, the relational and representational procedures established between the Third Sector and the Public Administration play an important role in this debate. The “Gipuzkoan case”, characterized by the approval of a new normative framework and the start up of a co-creation process, exemplifies this tendency and it turns it into a reflection scenario for the improvement of the procedures mentioned previously, as well as for the welfare system as a whole. Based on a participatory methodology, this research aims to investigate the possibility of creating a social dialogue table. Professionals from different spheres, the public administration and the third sector, were invited to participate in the study by taking part in the semi-structured interviews and focus groups conducted. This article presents the main results obtained in the research process carried out. Especial focus has been paid on different elements, which have led the debate, and that concern both, the third sector and the public administration, considering the possibility of creating a new area for representation.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Alford, J. (2014). The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299-316. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.806578
  • Andreotti, A., Mingione, E., i Polizzi, E. (2012). Local welfare systems: A challenge for social cohesion. Urban Studies, 4989, 1925-1940.
  • Arrieta, F., i Sobremonte, E. (2016). Elementos para un relato de la gober- nanza del Sistema Vasco de Servicios Sociales. Zerbitzuan, 61, 5-20. DOI: 10.5569/1134-7147.61.01
  • Bano, M. (2018). Partnerships and the Good-Governance Agenda: Impro- ving Service Delivery Through State-NGO Collaborations. Voluntas, 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-017-9937-y
  • Bode, I. (2006). Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 346-359. Doi: 10.1177/0958929706068273
  • Brandsen, T., i Honingh, M. (2015). Distinguishing Different Types of Co-production: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical De ni- tions. Public Administration Review, 76, 427-435.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12465
  • Brandsen, T., i Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493-501. DOI: 10.1080/14719030601022874
  • Brandsen, T., i Pape, U. (2015). The Netherlands: The paradox of govern- ment-nonpro t partners. Voluntas, 26, 2267-2282.
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9646-3
  • Brandsen, T., Trommel, W., i Verschuere, B. (2017). The state and the reconstruction of civil society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(4), 676-693. DOI: 10.1177/0020852315592467
  • Castells, M. (2017). Ruptura. La crisis de la democracia liberal. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Decret 283/2012, d’11 de desembre, pel qual es constitueix i regula la Mesa del Diàleg Civil. BOPV núm. 248, de 24 de desembre.
  • Ferrán, A. (2017). Loiolaetxea: Respuesta a la exclusión desde la solidari- dad. Zerbitzuan, 64, 213-226. DOI: 10.5569/1134-7147.64.15
  • Gimeno, J. (2015). Necesidad y necesidades del tercer sector. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 38, 49-74.
  • Izquieta, J. L., Callejo, J. J., i Prieto, J. M. (2008). El tercer sector y las administraciones públicas. Relaciones en el ámbito de la atención social en los niveles regional y local. Revista Internacional de Sociolo- gía, LXVI(49), 115-139.
  • Jaraiz, G. (2018). El tercer sector de acción social como prestador de servicios. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 38, 91-112.
  • Llei 12/2008, de 5 de desembre, de serveis socials. BOPV núm. 246, de 24 de desembre.
  • Llei 6/2016, de 12 de maig, del tercer sector social d’Euskadi. BOE núm. 151, de 23 de juny.
  • Lu, J., i Xu, C. (2018). Complementary or supplementary? The relations- hip between government size and nonpro t sector size. Voluntas, 1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-9981-2
  • Martínez-Buján, R. (2014). Los modelos territoriales de organización so- cial del cuidado a personas mayores en los hogares. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 145, 99-126.
  • Milbourne, L. (2009). Remodelling the third sector: Advancing collabora- tion or competition in community-based initiatives? Journal of Social Policy, 38(2), 277-297.
doi: 10.1017/S0047279408002845
  • Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., i Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treat- ment? Public Management Review,
  • Ranci, C. (2015). The Long-Term Evolution of the Government – Third Sector Partnership in Italy: Old Wine in a New Bottle ? Voluntas, 26, 2311-2329. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9650-7
  • Rodríguez, G. (2015). Avances, limitaciones y retos del tercer sector de acción social en España. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 38, 75-97.
  • Salamon, L. M. (2015). Introduction: The nonpro tization of the welfare state. Voluntas, 26, 2147-2154.
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9638-3
  • Salamon, L. M., i Toepler, S. (2015). Government-nonpro t cooperation: Anomaly or necessity? Voluntas, 26, 2155-2177.
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9651
  • Salgado, A. (2007). Investigación cualitativa: Diseños, evaluación del rigor metodológico y retos. Liberabit, 13, 71-78.
  • Susías, C. (2018). Estrategias para la sostenibilidad (institucional, organizativa, económica) del tercer sector de acción social. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 38, 113-134.
  • Taylor, M., i Bassi, A. (1998). Unpacking the State: The implications for the third sector of changing relationships between national and local government. Voluntas, 9(2), 113-136.
  • Taylor, S., i Bodgan, R. (1990). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., i Tummers, L. G. (2015). A Systema- tic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the soci- al innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
  • Zubero, I. (2018). El tercer sector como movimiento voluntariadista: Una propuesta para repensar la identidad del TSA desde el paradigma de la democracia del ciudadano. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 38, 43-68.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet