Knowledge stakeholders in RIS' literatureto be or not to be

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abramo, G.; D’angelo, C. A. (2015): A methodology to compute the territorial productivity of scientists: The case of Italy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 675-685.
• Albizu, E.; Olazaran, M.; Lavía, C.; Otero, B. (2011): Relationship between vocational training centres and industrial SMEs in the Basque Country: A regional innovation system approach, Intangible Capital, 7 (2), pp. 329-355.
• Albizu, E.; Olazaran, M.; Lavía, C.; Otero, B. (2017): Making visible the role of vocational education and training in firm innovation: evidence from Spanish SMEs. European Planning Studies, 25(11), 2057-2075.
• Archambault, E.; Campbell, D.; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V. (2009): Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320-1326.
• Asheim, B.T.; Gertler, M.S. (2005): The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Asheim, B.T.; Smith, H.l.; Oughton, C. (2011): Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy. Regional studies, 45(7), 875-891.
• Asheim, B.T.; Grillitsch, M.; Trippl, M. (2016): Regional innovation systems: past– present–future. Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation, 45-62.
• Autio, E. (1998): Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6(2), 131-140.
• Boyack, K.W.; Klavans, R. (2010): Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
• Callon, M.; Courtial, J.P.; Laville, F. (1991): Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205.
• Camagni, R.; Capello, R. (2013): Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and change, 44(2), 355-389.
• Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. (2011a): Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402.
• Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. (2011b): An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166.
• Cooke, P. (1992): Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365-382.
• Cooke, P. (2004): The regional innovation system in Wales: evolution or eclipse. In Cooke P, Heidenreich M, Braczyk H-J (Eds) Regional innovation systems, 2nd Edition. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 214-233.
• Cooke, P.; Uranga, M.G.; Etxebarria, G. (1998): Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and planning A, 30(9), 1563-1584.
• Cooke, P.; Heidenreich, M.; Braczyk, H.-J. (Eds.) (2004): Regional Innovation Systems, second ed. Routledge, London.
• Doloreux, D.; Parto, S. (2005): Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in society, 27(2), 133-153.
• Doloreux, D.; Porto Gomez, I. (2017): A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research. European Planning Studies, 1-17.
• Etzkowitz, H.; Klofsten, M. (2005): The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge‐ based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
• Glänzel, W.; Schoepflin, U. (1995): A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature in the social sciences. Journal of Information Science, 21: 37–53.
• Gorraiz, J.; Schloegl, C. (2008): A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science. Journal of Information Science, 34(5), 715-725.
• Hjalager, A.M. (2002): Repairing innovation defectiveness in tourism. Tourism management, 23(5), 465-474.
• Ho, Y.S. (2013): Comments on «a bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900–2010». Scientometrics, 96(3), 929-931.
• Hommen, L.; Doloreux, D. (2004): ‘Bringing labour back in: a «New» point of departure for the regional innovation systems approach?’ in P. Flensburg, S.A. Hörte and K. Karlsson (Eds). Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Management in Industrial Clusters and Industrial Networks, London: Edward Elgar Publisher.
• Huber, F. (2012): On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge information technology cluster. Regional studies, 46(9), 11691182.
• Lee, P.C.; Su, H.N. (2010): Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation, 12(1), 26-40.
• Leydesdorff, L. (1998): Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25.
• Martínez, M.A.; Cobo, M.J.; Herrera, M.; Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015): Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 257-277.
• Minguillo, D., Tijssen, R.; Thelwall, M. (2015): Do science parks promote research and technology? A scientometric analysis of the UK. Scientometrics, 102(1), 701-725.
• Morris, S.A.; Van Der Veer Martens, B. (2008): Mapping research specialties.Annual review of information science and technology, 42(1), 213-295.
• Murgado-Armenteros, E.M.; Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M.; Torres-Ruiz, F.J.; Cobo, M.J. (2015): Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis. Scientometrics, 102(1), 519-557.
• Navarro, M. (2009): «Los sistemas regionales de innovación. Una revisión crítica», EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 70(01), pages 25-59.
• Nederhof, A.J.; Noyons, E.C.M. (1992): Assessment of the international standing of university departments’ research: A comparison of bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 24: 393– 404.
• Nederhof, A.J.; Van Raan, A.F.J. (1993): A Bibliometric Analysis of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review. Research Policy, 22: 353–368.
• Noyons, E. (2001): Bibliometric mapping of science in a policy context. Scientometrics, 50(1), 83-98.
• Olazaran, M.; Albizu, E.; Lavía, C.; Otero, B. (2013): Formación profesional, pymes e innovación en Navarra. Vocational training, SMEs and innovation in Navarre. Cuadernos De Gestión, 13(1), 15-39.
• Porto Gómez, I.; Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.; Aguirre Larrakoetxea, U.; Vocations And Learning (2017) : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-017-9187-6
• Rodríguez-Soler, J.; Brunet Icart, I. (2018): Between vocational education and training centres and companies: study of their relations under the regional innovation system approach. Studies in Continuing Education, 40(1), 46-61.
• Sun, Y.; Grimes, S. (2016): The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 17-40.
• Toivanen, H.; Ponomariov, B. (2011): African regional innovation systems: bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics, 88(2), 471-493.
• Van Raan, A.F. (2005): Measurement of central aspects of scientific research: Performance, interdisciplinarity, structure. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(1), 1-19.