Understanding the current fragmentation of the Law and the coexistence of supranational legal orders

  1. Luis I. Gordillo Pérez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

Aldizkaria:
Anuario iberoamericano de justicia constitucional

ISSN: 1138-4824

Argitalpen urtea: 2017

Zenbakia: 21

Orrialdeak: 59-80

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Anuario iberoamericano de justicia constitucional

Laburpena

Este artículo se centra en la problemática derivada de la fragmentación del derecho y algunos de los aspectos derivados de la necesaria coexistencia entre ordenamientos jurídicos. El trabajo partirá del análisis de los conceptos clásicos, como derecho nacional, monismo o dualismo y se centrará, a continuación, en nuevas concepciones de las relaciones entre ordenamientos, tales como el pluralismo y el constitucionalismo. Seguidamente, este artículo explorará la situación actual de fragmentación del ordenamiento jurídico en el nivel supranacional. Para ello, analizará críticamente las diferentes concepciones y modelos propuestos por la doctrina para tratar de regular la compleja situación. Finalmente, este trabajo intentará predecir el futuro del debate, señalando posibles evoluciones en los distintos enfoques que pretenden aportar luz a la tarea de gestionar las relaciones interordinamentales.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Arriola, N. (2017). La convergencia de dos sistemas de integración: las relaciones entre la OMC y la UE en perspectiva constitucional. Cizur Menor: Thomson-Aranzadi.
  • Bradley, C. A. and Goldsmith, J. L. (1998). Federal Courts and the Incorporation of International Law. Harvard Law Review, 111, 2260-2275.
  • Brownlie, I. (2003). Principles of Public International Law, 6th ed. Oxford: University Press.
  • Buffard, I., Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Wittich, S. (eds.). (2008). International Law between universalism and fragmentation: Festschrift in honour of Gerhard Hafner. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Bustos Gisbert, R. (2005). La Constitución red: un estudio sobre supraestatalidad y Constitución. Oñate: IVAP.
  • Calhoun, J. C. and Lence, R. M. (1992). Union and Liberty: The Political Philosophy of John C. Calhoun. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  • Cass, D. A. (2005). The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization. Legitimacy, Democracy, and Community in the International Trading System. Oxford: University Press.
  • Choudhry, S. (ed.). (2006). The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Oxford: University Press.
  • De Búrca, G. (2010). The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order After Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal, 51 (1), 1-49.
  • De Búrca, G. and Gerstenberg, O. (2005). The Denationalization of Constitutional Law. Harvard International Law Journal, 47 (1), 243-262.
  • De Wet, E. (2006). The International Constitutional Order. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55 (1), 51-76.
  • Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman. J. P. (eds.). (2009). Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: University Press.
  • García Guerrero, J. L. (2017). Los embates de la globalización a la democracia. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 176, 113-146.
  • Gordillo, L. (2012). Interlocking Constitutions: Towards an Interordinal Theory of National, European and UN Law. Oxford: Hart.
  • Gordillo, L. (2014). Hacia la consolidación de un constitucionalismo interordinamental. Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional, 18, 275-328.
  • Gordillo, L. and Canedo, J. R. (2016). Los fundamentos de la constitución económica de la Unión Europea. Revista de Derecho de la Unión Europea, 30-31, 23-55.
  • Gordillo, L. and Martinico, G. (2015). Historias del País de las Hadas. La jurisprudencia constitucionalizadora del Tribunal de Justicia. Madrid: Civitas.
  • Habermas, J. (2004). Der gespaltene Westen: Kleine Politische Schriften X. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
  • Halberstam, D. (2010). Constitutionalism and Pluralism in Marbury and Van Gend. In M. P. Maduro and L. Azoulai (eds.). The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (pp. 26-36). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Held, D. and Koenig-Archibugi, M. (eds.). (2003). Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance. London: Polity Press.
  • Jacqué, J. P. (2007). Droit constitutionnel national, Droit communautaire, CEDH, Charte des Nations Unies. L’instabilité des rapports de système entre ordres juridiques. Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel, 60, 3-37.
  • Joerges, C. (2006). Constitutionalism in Postnational Constellations: Contrasting. Social Regulation in the EU and in the WTO. In C. Joerges and E. U. Petersmann (eds.). Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (pp. 491-527). Oxford: Hart.
  • Kelsen, H. (1926). Les rapports de système entre le droit interne et le droit international public. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, 14, 227332.
  • Kelsen, H. (1952). Principles of International Law. New York: Rinehart.
  • Koskenniemi, M. (2007). Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes About International Law and Globalization. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8 (1), 9-36.
  • Krisch, N. (2006). The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law. European Journal of International Law, 17 (1), 247-278.
  • Kronke, H. and Goode, R. (2007). Transnational Commercial Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: University Press.
  • Kumm, M. (2006). Constitutional Democracy Encounters International Law: Terms of Engagement. In S. Choudhry (ed.). The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (pp. 256293). Oxford: University Press.
  • Kunz, J. L. (1925). La primauté du droit des gens. Revue de Droit International et de Legislation Comparé, 6, 556-598.
  • La Pérgola, A. (1961). Costituzione e adattamento dell’ordinamento interno al diritto internazionale. Milano: Giuffrè.
  • La Pérgola, A. and del Duca, P. (1985). New International Law in National Systems: Community Law, International Law and The Italian Constitution. American Journal of International Law, 79 (3), 598-621.
  • Loewenstein, K. (1940). The Government and Politics Of Germany. In J. T. Shotwell (ed). Governments of Continental Europe (pp. 279-569). New York: Macmillan.
  • Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds.). (2008). The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: University Press.
  • Maccormick, N. (ed.). (1999). Questioning Sovereignty. Law State and Nation in the European Commonwealth. Oxford: University Press.
  • MacDonald, R. S. J. and Johnston, D. M. (eds.). (2005). Towards World Constitutionalism: Issues in the Legal Ordering of the World Community. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Mclaughlin, A. C. (1935). A Constitutional History of the United States. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Mirkine-Guetzévitch, B. (1931). Droit international et droit constitutionnel. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, 38, 307-465.
  • Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (3), 579-610.
  • Petersmann, E. U. (2007). Constitutionalism and the Regulation of International Markets: How to Define the “Development Objectives” of the World Trading System? European University Institute Law Working Papers, 2007/23. Available at: http:// cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/7045.
  • Petersmann, E. U. (2007b). Justice in International Economic Law? From the “International Law among States” to “International Integration Law” and “International Constitutional Law”. Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence (pp. 105-146). New York: Oceana Publications.
  • Petersmann, E. U. (2008). Why Rational Choice Theory Requires a Multilevel Constitutional Approach to International Economic Law. A Response to the Case for Reforming the WTO’s Enforcement Mechanism. University of Illinois Law Review, 1, 359-382.
  • Petersmann, E. U. (2008b). State Sovereignty, Popular Sovereignty and Individual Sovereignty: From Constitutional Nationalism to Multilevel Constitutionalism in International Economic Law? In W. Shan, P. Simons and D. Singh (eds.). Redefining Sovereignty in International Economic Law. Studies in International Trade Law (pp. 27-60). Oxford: Hart.
  • Petersmann, E. U. (2016). Methodology problems in international economic law and adjudication. European University Institute Law Working Papers, 2016/12. Available at: http:// cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/40467.
  • Petersmann, E. U. (2016b). Cosmopolitan constitutionalism: Linking local engagement with international economic law and human rights. European University Institute Law Working Papers, 2016/15. Available at: http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/40866.
  • Rigaux, F. (1998). Hans Kelsen on International Law. European Journal of International Law, 9, 325-343.
  • Sarooshi, D. (2007). International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers. Oxford: University Press.
  • Schermers, H. G. and Blokker, N. M. (2004). International Institutional Law: Unity Within Diversity, 4th ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Scott, C. (2009). ‘Transnational Law’ as proto-concept: Three conceptions. German Law Journal, 10 (6-7), 859-876.
  • Simma, B. (1994). From bilateralism to community interest in International Law. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, 250 (6), 217-384.
  • Sousa Santos, B. (2003). Towards a New Legal Common Sense, 2nd ed. Cambridge: University Press.
  • Starke, J. G. (1936). Monism and Dualism in the Theory of International Law. British Yearbook of International Law, 17, 66-81.
  • Tomuschat, C. (1999). International Law: ensuring the survival of mankind on the eve of a new century. General Course on Public International Law. Recueil des cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, 281, 9-438.
  • Torres, A. (2009). Conflict of Rights in the European Union: A Theory of Supranational Adjudication. Oxford: University Press.
  • Trebilcock, M. J. and Howse, R. (1999). The Regulation of International Trade, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  • Triepel, H. (1907) [1899]. Völkerrecht und Landesrecht. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr-Paul Siebeck.
  • Triepel, H. (1925). Les rapports entre le Droit interne et le Droit international. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, 1 (1923), 73-121.
  • Von Bogdandy, A. (2008). Pluralism, direct effect, and the ultimate say: On the relationship between international and domestic constitutional law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (3-4), 397-413.
  • Walker, N. (2002). The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. The Modern Law Review, 65 (3), 317-359.
  • Walker, N. (2007). Making a World of Difference? Habermas, Cosmopolitanism and the Constitutionalization of International Law. In O. A. Payrow Shabani (ed.). Multiculturalism and Law: A Critical Debate (pp. 219-234). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  • Weiler, J. H. H. (1999). The Constitution of Europe, “Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?” and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge: University Press.
  • Zucca, L. (2008). Conflicts of fundamental rights as constitutional. In E. Brems (ed.). Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights dilemmas (pp. 19-39). Antwerp: Intersentia.
  • Zumbansen, P. (2006). Transnational Law. In J. Smits (ed.). Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (pp. 738-754). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet