Second Order of Sexual Harassment - SOSH

  1. Vidu, Ana
  2. Valls, Rosa
  3. Puigvert, Lidia
  4. Melgar, Patricia
  5. Joanpere, Mar
Revista:
REMIE: Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research

ISSN: 2014-2862

Año de publicación: 2017

Título del ejemplar: February

Volumen: 7

Número: 1

Páginas: 1-26

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17583/REMIE.0.2505 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: REMIE: Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research

Resumen

La violencia de género no puede ser superada sin un amplio apoyo social a las víctimas, que está dramáticamente limitado por la violencia contra quienes toman una postura activa en favor de los sobrevivientes. La lucha contra la violencia de género requiere acciones para proteger tanto a las víctimas directas de acoso sexual como a las víctimas de acoso sexual de segundo orden -SOSH-. Aunque la primera definición de SOSH viene de 1990 (Dziech & Weiner, 1990), ha habido una falta de investigación sobre el tema, a pesar de su importancia social y científica. El objetivo de este artículo es doble: a) proporcionar un concepto de SOSH útil para presentar los avances de la ciencia y la sociedad, a través de la identificación de situaciones específicas de las personas y aquellos con quienes trabajan y han sufrido SOSH; B) revelar las principales aportaciones para hacer frente a estas situaciones a través de diversos aspectos en los ámbitos jurídico, universitario, ciudadano, mediático y político. Utilizando una metodología cualitativa concluimos destacando la necesidad de desarrollar acciones conjuntas de toda la sociedad para identificar y legislar el SOSH, al tiempo que empoderar a los supervivientes y a quienes los apoyan, en un intento de erradicar la violencia de género. 

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., Cohn, E. S., Moorhead, C., Ward, S., & Walsh, W. (2005). Revisiting unwanted sexual experiences on campus: a 12-year follow-up. Violence Against Women, 11(4), 426–46, doi: 10.1177/1077801204274388
  • Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., Walsh, W. A., Cohn, E. S., & Ward, S. (2010). Friends of survivors: the community impact of unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(2), 242–56. doi: 10.1177/0886260509334407
  • Benson, D. J., & Thomson, G. E. (1982). Sexual Harassment on a University Campus: the confluence of authority relations, sexual interest and gender stratification. Social Problems, 29(3), 236–251, doi: 10.2307/800157
  • Choate, L. H. (2003). Sexual assault prevention programs for college men: An exploratory evaluation of the men against violence model. Journal of College Counseling, 6, 166–176, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1882.2003.tb00237.x/abstract
  • Clark, A., & Pino, A. (2016). We Believe You. Survivors of Campus Sexual Assault Speak Out. New York: Holt Paperback.
  • Clark, J. J., & Walker, R. (2011). Research Ethics in Victimization Studies: Widening the Lens. Violence against Women, 17(12), 1489–1508, doi: 10.1177/1077801211436167
  • Coker, A., Bush, H. M., Fisher, B., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, M. R., & DeGue, S. (2016). Multi-College Bystander Intervention. Evaluation for Violence Prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(3), 295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.034
  • Corradi, C., & Stöckl, H. (2016). The lessons of history: The role of the nation-states and the EU in fighting violence against women in 10 European countries. Current Sociology, 64(4), 671–688. doi: 10.1177/0011392116640457
  • Davis, J. (2002). Narrative and Social Movements. In J.E. Davis (Ed.), Stories of Change: Narrative and Social Movements (pp. 3–29). Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th Editio). Sage Publications.
  • Dey, E. L., Korn, J. S., & Sax, L. J. (1996). Betrayed by the Academy: The Sexual Harassment of Women College Faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 149–173. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080% 2F00221546.1996.11780254
  • Dick, K., & Ziering, A. (2016). The Hunting Ground. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.
  • Dziech, B.W., & Weiner, L. (1990). The Lecherous Professor: Sexual Harassment on Campus. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  • End Rape on Campus (EROC) (2016). Annual Report, April 2015-April 2016. Retrieved from http://endrapeoncampus.org/erocannualreport
  • Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women (NCJ 182369). Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf
  • FRA. (2014). Violence against women: an EU-wide survey. Main results report. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-vaw-survey-ata-glance-oct14_en.pdf
  • Gross, A. M., Winslett, A., Roberts, M., & Gohm, C. L. (2006). An Examination of Sexual Violence Against College Women. Violence Against Women, 12(3), 288–300. doi: 10.1177/1077801205277358
  • Kirkpatrick, C., & Kanin, E. (1957). Male Sex Aggression on a University Campus. American Sociological Review, 22(1), 52–58. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2088765
  • Milkman, R. (2016). A New Political Generation: Millennials and the Post2008 Wave of Protest. 2016 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 1-31, doi: 10.1177/0003122416681031
  • Official Journal of the European Union. (2012). Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. Volume 55. 12 November 2012. L315. Legistation. English edition. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2012:315:TOC
  • Oliver, E. (2011). Women’s. In S. Jackson, I. Malcolm, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Gendered Choices. Learning, Work, Identities in Lifelong Learning (pp. 69-83). London, UK: Springer.
  • Padrós, M. (2014). A Transformative Approach to Prevent Peer Violence in Schools Contributions from Communicative Research Methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 916-922. doi: 10.1177/1077800414537217
  • Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., Caldwell, D., & DeLuca, L. (1992). Tolerance for Sexual Harassment Related to Self-Reported Sexual Victimization. Gender and Society, 6(1), 122–138. doi: 10.1177/089124392006001008
  • Sable, M. R., Danis, F., Mauzy, D. L., & Gallagher, S. K. (2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55(3), 157–62, doi: 10.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162
  • Shorey, R. C., Zucosky, H., Brasfield, H., Febres, J., Cornelius, T. L., Sage, C., & Stuart, G. L. (2012). Dating violence prevention programming: Directions for future interventions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.001
  • United Nations. (2013). Elimination and prevention of all forms of violence against women and girls. 57th session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW57). World Conferences on Women. Retrieved from http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/csw57-stop-violence-against-women#sthash.XM5jd5G7.dpuf
  • Valls, R., Puigvert, L., Melgar, P., & García-Yeste, C. (2016). Breaking the silence at the Spanish universities. Findings from the First Study of Violence Against Women on Campuses in Spain. Violence against Women, 22(13), 1–21. doi: 10.1177/1077801215627511
  • WHO. (2016). Violence against women. Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. Fact sheet, November 2016. Media Centre. World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet