Evaluación de la fragmentación en los Sistemas Regionales de Innovaciónuna tipología para el caso de España

  1. Alberdi Pons, Xabier
  2. Gibaja Martíns, Juan José
  3. Parrilli, Mario Davide
Aldizkaria:
Investigaciones Regionales = Journal of Regional Research

ISSN: 1695-7253,  2340-2717

Argitalpen urtea: 2014

Zenbakia: 28

Orrialdeak: 7-35

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Investigaciones Regionales = Journal of Regional Research

Laburpena

This article is intended to estimate the inner connectivity of Spanish Regional Innovation Systems (RISs). In order to do so, we appraise their innerfragmentation with regards to certain system problems that so far have mainly been described in a theoretical fashion. Instead, we make use of four sets of quantitative indicators which are integrated into an interpretive framework composed of the main subsystems of RISs. Consequently, the so-called «managerial gaps», «structural holes», «innovation gaps» and the «valley of death» are placed together in this framework as a means to be further studied across the Spanish autonomous communities’ RISs. The empirical analysis is based on an ad hoc data exploitation which stems from various surveys conducted by the Spanish Official Statistical Institute (INE) and the Spanish Venture Capital Association (ASCRI). We conduct multivariate techniques such as Multiple Factor Analyses (MFA) and Cluster Analysis to reduce the dimensionality of our database, leading us to the presentation of a new typology for Spain. We find asymmetric responses with regards to these problems, which might demand for the design of individual corrective measures adapted to the specificities of each system observed.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Abascal, E.; Fernández, K., y Landaluce, M. I. (2001): «Técnicas Factoriales de Análisis de Tablas Múltiples: Nuevos Desarrollos Empíricos», http://hdl.handle.net/10810/5765.
  • Abdi, H., y Valentin, D. (2007): «Multiple Factor Analysis», en Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage (ed.) Neil Salkind.
  • ASCRI (2006-2012): Informe 2012. Capital Riesgo y Private Equity en España, Madrid, 2012.
  • Asheim, B. T., y Parrilli, M. D. (2012): «Introduction: Learning and Interaction. Drivers for Innovation in Current Competitive Markets», en Asheim, B. T., y Parrilli, M. D., Interactive Learning for Innovation: A Key Driver within Clusters and Innovation Systems, Palgrave-MacMillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6X.
  • Autio, E. (1998): «Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation», European Planning Studies, vol. 6, núm. 2.
  • Bessant, J., y Rush, H. (1995): «Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer», Research Policy, 24, 97-114.
  • Bessant, J., y Rush, H. (2000): Innovation agents and technology transfer, in Services, innovation and the knowledge-based economy, Miles, I., y Boden, M. (eds.), London, Continuum.
  • Buesa, M., y Heijs, J. (2007): «Los sistemas regionales de innovación en España», en Buesa, M., y Heijs, J. (coords.) Sistemas regionales de innovación: nuevas formas de análisis y medición, Madrid, Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros.
  • Buesa, M.; Heijs, J., y Martínez-Pellitero, M. (2002a): «Una tipología de los sistemas regionales de innovación en España», Madrid monografía, 5, 81-89.
  • Buesa, M.; Martínez-Pellitero, M.; Heijs, J., y Baumert, T. (2002b): «Los sistemas regionales de innovación en España: tipología basada en indicadores económicos e institucionales de las Comunidades Autónomas», Economía Industrial, 347, 15-32.
  • Buesa, M.; Martínez-Pellitero, M.; Heijs, J., y Baumert, T. (2007): «Novel applications of existing econometric instruments to analyze regional innovation systems: the Spanish case», en Suriñach et al. (eds.), Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters and Regional Development, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Buesa, M.; Martínez-Pellitero, M.; Heijs, J., y Baumert, T. (2008): «The IAIF index for European regional innovation capabilities», The 25th DRUID Conference, Aalborg, Dinamarca.
  • Burt, R. (1992): Structural Holes, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, R. (1997): «The contingent Value of Social Capital», Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
  • Burt, R. (2004): «Structural Holes and Good Ideas», AJS, vol. 110, núm. 2 (septiembre 2004), 349-399.
  • Chaminade, C.; Intarakumnerd, P., y Sapprasert, K. (2012): «Measuring systemic problems in National Innovation Systems. An application to Thailand», Research Policy, 41, 1476-1488.
  • Cooke, P. (2005): «Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation. Exploring "Globalization 2" a new model of industry organization», Research Policy, 34, 1128-1149.
  • Cooke, P. (2006): «Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The construction of Advantage», Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5-15.
  • Cooke, P., y Morgan, K. (1998): The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Coronado, D., y Acosta, M. (1999): «Innovación tecnológica y desarrollo regional», Información Comercial Española, 781, 103-116.
  • Dalziel, M. (2010): «Why do innovation intermediaries exists?», Paper presented at Summer Conference 2010: «Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organizational and Technology» at Imperial College London Business School, 16-18 junio.
  • Escofier, B., y Pagès, J. (1990): «Multiple factor analysis», Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 18, 121-140.
  • Escofier, B., y Pagès, J. (1998): Analyses factorielles simples et multiples, Paris, Dunod.
  • Escofier, B., y Pagès, J. (2008): Analyses factorielles simples et multiples. Objectifs, methodes et interprétation, 4.a ed., Paris, Dunod.
  • Fischer, M. (2001): «Innovation, Knowledge creation and systems of innovation», Regional Science, 35, 199-216.
  • Ford, G.; Koutsky, T., y Spiwak, L. (2007): «A Valley of Death in the Innovation Sequence: An Economic Investigation», Discussion paper prepared for the Commerce Department, Technology Administration, under Study Contract No. SB1341-05-2-0023 administered by KT Consulting, INC. Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy Studies.
  • Hargadon, A. (1998): «Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation », California Management Review, vol. 40, núm. 3, primavera.
  • Hargadon, A., y Sutton, R. (1997): «Technology Brokering and Innovation in Product Development Firm», Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 716-749.
  • Howells, J., y Edler, J. (2011): «Structural innovations: towards a unified perspective?», Science and Public Policy, marzo, 157-167.
  • Husson, F.; Josse, J.; Lê, S., y Mazet, J. (2011): «FactoMineR: Multivariate Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining with R», R package version 1.19, http://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=FactoMineR.
  • Kostianien, J. (2002): «Urban Economic Development Policy in the Network Society», Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki, Tekniikan Akateemisten Liitto.
  • Lê, S.; Josse, J., y Husson, F. (2008): «FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis», Journal of Statistical Software, 25 (1), 1-18.
  • Markham, S. K. (2002): «Moving Technologies From Lab to Market», Research-Technology management, vol. 45, núm. 6, 1 de noviembre de 2002, 31-42 (12).
  • Markham, S. K.; Ward, S. J.; Aiman-Smith, L., y Kingon, A. (2010): «The Valley of Death as Context for Role Theory in Product Innovation», Product Innovation Management 2010, 27, 402-417.
  • Martin, R., y Trippl, M. (2013): «System Failures, Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Policies», Center for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University, Paper núm. 2013/13.
  • Martínez-Pellitero, M. (2002): «Recursos y resultados de los sistemas de innovación: elaboración de una tipología de sistemas regionales de innovación en España», IAIF working paper, 34.
  • Martínez-Pellitero, M. (2007): «Los sistemas regionales de innovación en Europa: tipología y eficiencia», en Buesa, M., y Heijs, J. (coords.), Sistemas regionales de innovación: nuevas formas de análisis y medición, Madrid, Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros, 215-256.
  • Martínez-Pellitero, M. (2008): Tipología y eficiencia de los sistemas regionales de innovación. Un estudio aplicado al caso europeo, Tesis doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Murphy, L. M., y Edwards, P. L. (2003): «Bridging the Valley of Death: Transitioning from Public to Private Sector Financing», National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 1617 Cole Boulevard. Golden, Colorado 80401-3393. US Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute. Battelle. Bechtel. Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337.
  • Navarro, M., y Gibaja, J. J. (2009): «Las tipologías en los sistemas regionales de innovación. El caso de España», Ekonomiaz, núm. 70, 1. er cuatrimestre.
  • Navarro, M., y Gibaja, J. J. (2010): «Tipologías de innovación basadas en análisis estadísticos para las regiones europeas y españolas», en Parrilli, M. D. (ed.), Innovación y aprendizaje: lecciones para el diseño de políticas, Bilbao, Agencia Vasca de la Innovación: Innobasque.
  • Navarro, M., y Gibaja, J. J. (2012): «Typologies of Innovation Based on Statistical Analysis for European and Spanish Regions», en Asheim, B. T., y Parrilli, M. D. (eds.), Interactive Learning for Innovation: A Key Driver within Clusters and Innovation Systems, Basingstoke, Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Nonaka, I., y Takeuchi, H. (1995): «The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation», Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
  • Obstfeld, D. (2005): «Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation», Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100-130.
  • OECD (1997/2006): Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpretating innovation data, Paris, OECD-EUROSTAT, varias ediciones.
  • Pagès, J. (2004): «Multiple Factor Analysis: Main Features and Application to Sensory Data», Revista Colombiana de Estadística, vol. 27, junio, 1, 1-26.
  • Parrilli, M. D.; Aranguren, M. J., y Larrea, M. (2010): «The Role of Interactive Learning to Close the "Innovation Gap" in SME-Based Local Economies: A furniture Cluster in the Basque Country and its Key Policy Implications», European Planning Studies, vol. 18, núm. 3, marzo.
  • Pavía, J. M., y Larraz, B. (2012): «Regional Size, Wealtz and EU Regional Policy», Investigaciones Regionales, Sección Notas, 127 a 141.
  • Porter, M. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London, The MacMillan Press.
  • R Development Core Team (2011): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Viena, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0. R version 2.15.1. URL, http://www.R-project.org/.
  • Smepol (2000): «SME policy and the regional dimension of innovation (SMEPOL)», Project núm. 1309. Contract núm. SOE1-CT97-1061. The STEP Group, Studies in Technology, Innovation and Economic Policy, Norway (coord.).
  • Susiluoto, I. (2003): «Effects of ICT on Regional Economic Efficiency», Web Publications, ISSN 1458-5707, ISBN 952-473-146-0.
  • Tödtling, F., y Trippl, M. (2005): «One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach», Research Policy, 34, 1203-1219.
  • Trippl, M., y Tödtling, F. (2007): «Developing Biotechnology Clusters in Non-high Technology Regions-the case of Austria», Industry and innovation, vol. 14, 1, 47-67.
  • Wasserman, S., y Faust, K. (1994): Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, New York and Cambridge, ENG: Cambridge University Press.
  • World Economic Forum (2008): The Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009, Geneva, World Economic Forum.
  • Yusuf, S. (2008): «Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and businesses», Research Policy, 37, 1167-1174.
  • Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M.; Voigt, P.; Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., y Jiménez-Sáez, F. (2007): «Regional Innovation Systems: How to Assess Performance», Regional Studies, 41: 5, 661-672.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet