Características psicométricas y aplicabilidad clínica de la "Escala de ajuste didáctico" en una muestra de parejas españolas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahlborg, T., Persson, L. O. y Hallberg, L. R. M. (2005). Assessing the quality of the dyadic relationship in first-time parents: development of a new instrument. Journal of Family Nursing, 11, 19-37.
• Antle, B. F., Karam, E., Christensen, D. N., Barbee, A. P. y Sar, B. K. (2011). An evaluation of healthy relationship education to reduce intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Social Work, 14, 387-406.
• Badr, H., Carmack, C. L., Kashy, D. A., Cristofanilli, M. y Revenson, T. A. (2010). Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychology, 29, 169-180.
• Bentler, P. M. y Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
• Bornstein, P. H. y Bornstein, M. T. (1988). Terapia de pareja. Enfoque conductual-sistémico. Madrid: Pirámide.
• Browne, M. W. y Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing fit. En K. A. Bollen (dir.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Cáceres, J. (1987). Experiencias de tratamientos grupales en un Servicio de Orientación Familiar y Educación Sexual. Cuadernos de Medicina Psicosomática y Sexología, 1, 31-38.
• Cáceres, J. (2006). La evaluación de los problemas de pareja. En V. Caballo (dir.), Manual para la evaluación clínica de los trastornos psicológicos: trastornos de la edad adulta e informes psicológicos (pp. 361-373). Madrid: Pirámide.
• Cáceres, J. (2011). Abuso y violencia en las relaciones de pareja. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 19, 91-116.
• Cáceres, J. (2012). Separación y divorcio. En L. Llavona y X. Méndez (dir.), Manual del psicólogo de familia (pp. 215-230). Madrid: Pirámide.
• Cáceres, J. y Herrero, D. (2011). Cuantificación y análisis de la concordancia entre padres y tutores en el diagnóstico del trastorno por déficit de atención/hiperactividad. Revista de Neurología, 52, 527-535.
• Carey, M. P., Spector, I. P., Lantinga, L. J. y Krauss, D. J. (1993). Reliability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 238-240.
• Carmines, E. G. y McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures. En G. W. Bornstedt y E. F. Borgatta (dirs.), Social measurement: current issues (pp. 112-133). Beverly Hills, LA: Sage.
• Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (ed. rev.). Nueva York: Academic Press.
• Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D. y Epstein, J. N. (1998). The revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 257-268.
• Dinkel, A. y Balck, F. (2006). Psychometrische analyse der Deutschen Dyadic Adjustment Scale [Psychometric analysis of the German Dyadic Adjustment Scale]. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie mit Zeitschrift fur angewandte Psychologie und Sprache y Kognition, 214, 1-9.
• Eddy, J. M., Heyman, R. E. y Weiss, R. L. (1991). An empirical evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: exploring the differences between marital 'satisfaction' and 'adjustment'. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 199-220.
• Espina, A. (2002). Alexitimia y relaciones de pareja. Psicothema, 14, 760-764.
• Espina, A., Pumar, B., González, P., Santos, A., García, E. y Ayerbe, A. (2000). Emoción expresada y características de personalidad, psicopatológicas y de ajuste diádico en padres de esquizofrénicos. Psiquis, 21, 23-33.
• Eurostat (2011). Population statistics. Recuperado el 23 de febrero de 2011, desde http://epp. eurostat. ec. europa. eu/.
• Fisiloglu, H. y Demir, A. (2000). Applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 214-218.
• Fitzpatrick, M. K., Salgado, D. M., Suvak, M. K., King, L. A. y King, D. W. (2004). Associations of gender-role ideology with behavioral and attitudinal features of intimate partner aggression. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 91-102.
• Fleiss, J. L. y Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 613-619.
• Freeston, M. H. y Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: is it still relevant for the 1990s? Psychological Reports. 81, 419-34, 1997.
• Godbout, N., Dutton, D. G., Lussier, Y. y Sabourin, S. P. (2009). Early exposure to violence, domestic violence, attachment representations, and marital adjustment. Personal Relationships, 16, 365-384.
• Gomez, R. y Leal, I. (2008). Ajustamento conjugal: características psicométricas da versao Portuguesa da Dyadic Adjustment Scale [Marital adjustement: psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of Dyadic Adjustment Scale]. Analise Psicologica, 26, 625-638.
• Graham, J. M., Liu, Y. J. y Jeziorski, J. L. (2006). The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: a reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 701-717.
• Heiman, J. R., Scott Long, J., Smith, S. N., Fisher, W. A., Sand, M. S. y Rosen, R. C. (2011). Sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife and older couples in five countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 741-753.
• Hollist, C. S., Falceto, O. G., Ferreira, L. M., Miller, R. B., Springer, P. R., Fernandes, C. L. y Nunes, N. A. (2012). Portuguese translation and validation of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marital y Family Therapy, 38, 348-353.
• Jiang, Y., Terhorst, L., Donovan, H. S., Weimer, J. M., Schulz, R. y Sherwood, P. (2012). Locke-Wallace Short Marital-Adjustment Test: psychometric evaluation in caregivers for persons with primary malignant brain tumor. Oncology Nursing Forum. 39, 573-574.
• Jöreskog, K. y Sörbom, D. (1997). LISREL 8: user's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
• Kazak, A. E., Jarmas, A. y Snitzer, L. (1988). The assessment of marital satisfaction: an evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 82-91.
• Lee, J. A. (1976). Lovestyles. Londres: J. M. Dent y Sons.
• Locke, H. J. y Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short-term marital adjustment and prediction tests: their reliability and validity. Journal of Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251-255.
• Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
• Pankiewicz, P., Majkowicz, M. A. y Krzykowski, G. (2012). Anxiety disorders in intimate partners and the quality of their relationship. Journal of Affective Disorders, 140, 176-180.
• Sabourin, S., Bouchard, G., Wright, J. y Lussier, Y. (1988). L'influence du sexe sur l'invariance factorielle de l'echelle d'adjustement dyadique. Science et Comportement, 18, 187-201.
• Sabourin, S., Lussier, Y., Laplante, B. y Wright, J. (1990). Unidimensional and multidimensional models of dyadic adjustment: a hierarchical reconciliation. Psychological Assessment: a Journal of Consulting y Clinical Psychology, 2, 333-337.
• Sabourin, S., Valois, P. y Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17, 15-27.
• Satorra, A. y Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514.
• Shek, D. y Cheung, C. (2008). Dimensionality of the Chinese Dyadic Adjustment Scale based on confirmatory factor analyses. Social Indicators Research, 86, 201-212.
• South, S. C., Krueger, R. F. y Iacono, W. G. (2009). Factorial invariance of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale across gender. Psychological Assessment, 21, 622-628.
• Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-29.
• Spanier, G. B. (1985). Improve, refine, recast, expand, clarify: don't abandon. Journal of Marriage y Family, 47, 1073.
• Stenberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-136.
• Trost, J. E. (1985). Abandon adjustment! Journal of Marriage y Family, 47, 1072.
• Trudel, G., Villeneuve, L., Preville, M., Boyer, R. y Frechette, V. (2010). Dyadic adjustment, sexuality and psychological distress in older couples. Sexual y Relationship Therapy, 25, 306-315.
• Vandeleur, C. L., Fenton, B. T., Ferrero, F. y Preisig, M. (2003). Construct validity of the French version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 167-175.
• Whisman, M. A. y Jacobson, N. S. (1992). Change in marital adjustment following marital therapy: a comparison of two outcome measures. Psychological Assessment, 4, 219-223.
• Youngblut, J. M., Brooten, D. y Menzies, V. (2006). Psychometric properties of Spanish versions of the FACES II and Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 14, 181-189.