Adaptación cultural del Instrumento "Patrones de Comunicación Familiar- R"

  1. Rivero, Nayeli
  2. Martínez Pampliega, Ana
Aldizkaria:
European journal of education and psychology

ISSN: 1888-8992,  1989-2209

Argitalpen urtea: 2010

Alea: 3

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 141-153

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.30552/EJEP.V3I1.35 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: European journal of education and psychology

Laburpena

The aim of this study was to obtain a culturally adapted Spanish version of the �Revised family communication patterns instrument (RFCP), using rigorous procedures in the retro-translation process and in the subsequent empirical study. The sampling consisted of 455 university students and two subscales for the conversation orientation were obtained (�Ideas expression� and �Differences acceptance�) and two for the conformity orientations (�Differences rejection� and �Obedience encourage�). All the scales proved to have good psychometric qualities and suitable convergent, concurrent and content validity, yet it is necessary to go more deeply into the conformity orientation. The construct validity was supported by a confirmatory factorial analysis showing that the RFCP is a useful instrument for family assessment.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Barnes, H.L. y Olson, D.H. (1982). Parent-adolescent communication scale. En D. H. Olson, H. McCubbin, H. L. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen y M. Wilson (Eds.), Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (pp. 51-63). St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota
  • Behling, O. y McFillen, J.M. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments. Problems and solutions. Londres: Sage.
  • Brislin, R.W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. En W. J. Lonner y W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Fitzpatrick, M.A. y Ritchie, L.D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 275-301.
  • Koerner, A. y Fitzpatrick, M.A. (2002a). Understanding family communication patterns and family functioning: The roles of conversation orientation and conformity orientation. Communication Yearbook, 26, 36-68.
  • Koerner, A. y Fitzpatrick, M.A. (2002b). You never leave your family in a fight: The impact of family of origin on conflict-behavior in romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 53, 234-251.
  • Koerner, A. y Fitzpatrick, M.A. (2004). Communication in intact families. En A. Vangelisti (Ed.), Hanbook of Family Communication (pp. 177-195). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. y Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. y Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Newburry Park: Sage.
  • Miller-Day, M. (2008). Talking to youth about drugs: What do late adolescents say about parental strategies? Family Relations, 57, 1-12.
  • Morales, P., Urosa, B. y Blanco, A. (2003). Construcción de escalas de actitudes tipo likert. Madrid: La Muralla/Hespérides.
  • Olson, D. H., Stewart, K. L. y Wilson, L. R. (1990). Health and stress profile (HSP), revised. Minneapolis: Profile of Health Systems.
  • Ritchie, L.D. (1991). Family communication patterns: An epistemic analysis and conceptual reinterpretation. Communication Research, 18, 548-565.
  • Ritchie, L.D. (1997). Parents' workplace experiences and family communication patterns. Communication Research, 24, 175-187.
  • Ritchie, L.D. y Fitzpatrick, M.A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17, 523-544.
  • Rogers, E. (2006). Introduction: A reflective view on the development of family communication. En L. Turner y R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Rueter, M.A. y Koerner, A.F. (2008). The effect of family communication patterns on adopted adolescent adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 7, 715-727.
  • Sanz, M., Iraurgi, I. y Martínez-Pampliega, A. (2002). Evaluación del funcionamiento familiar en toxicomanías: Adaptación española y características de adecuación métrica del FAPFACES IV. En I. Iraurgi y F. González-Saiz (Eds.), Instrumentos de evaluación en drogodependencias (pp. 403-434). Madrid: Aula Médica.
  • Segrin, C. (2006). Invited article: Family interactions and well-being: Integrative perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 3-21.
  • Schrodt, P. (2005). Family communication schemata and the circumplex model of family functioning. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 359-376.
  • Streiner, D. L. y Norman, G. L. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet