Juicios de justicia distributiva y su relación con el sistema de valores humanos
ISSN: 0213-4748, 1579-3680
Year of publication: 2005
Volume: 20
Issue: 2
Pages: 147-162
Type: Article
More publications in: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social
Abstract
This study examined distributive justice judgments, the relations between these judgments and the Rokeach terminal value system (1973), and the value system changes that take place when a justice task has to be performed. A sample of 828 undergraduate students completed the Rokeach Value Survey and the Apples Story task (Keats & Fu-Xi, 1994). Results revealed that the most frequent allocation pattern was the equalitarian pattern, followed by the equitative one. A predictive discriminant analysis indicated that only 48% of equalitarian participants and 68% of equitative participants were accurately identified from their scores on value hierarchies. Findings are explained according to the value pluralism model of Tetlock, Peterson & Lerner (1996). Values were ranked differently when they were measured in the context of the justice task.