Social sustainability and social (Dis)trust in outgroupsEvidence from Germany and Spain using the Factorial Survey

  1. Bartolomé, Edurne 1
  2. Dülmer, Hermann 2
  3. Coromina, Lluís 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

  2. 2 University of Cologne
    info

    University of Cologne

    Colonia, Alemania

    ROR https://ror.org/00rcxh774

  3. 3 Universitat de Girona
    info

    Universitat de Girona

    Girona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01xdxns91

Revista:
Cuadernos europeos de Deusto

ISSN: 1130-8354

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: A sustainable Europe: Society, Politics and Culture in the Anthropocene

Número: 64

Páginas: 81-109

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.18543/CED-64-2021PP81-109 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos europeos de Deusto

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

En el corto y medio plazo, la diversidad étnica tiende a reducir la confianza. Esta relación negativa se puede explicar por la teoría de la identidad social y por la teoría integrada de la amenaza. La última teoría distingue la amenaza realista (socio-económica) de la simbólica (cultural). Huntington plantea que, con el fin de la guerra fría, los conflictos han cambiado de puramente económicos a culturales, y principalmente religiosos. El objetivo de este artículo es desenmarañar por primera vez el impacto de las diferentes fuentes de percepción de amenaza además de las diferencias de grupos internos/externos a través del uso de una encuesta factorial, que se llevó a cabo en Bilbao (España) y Colonia (Alemania). Nuestro principal hallazgo es que, aunque ambas ciudades difieren en su composición religiosa y socioeconómica, sus ciudadanos poseen un nivel similar de confianza generalizada y de percepción de amenaza socioeconómica que supera a la simbólica. Se han encontrado evidencias algo más débiles de las diferencias en la confianza particularizada hacia grupos externos. Recibido: 03 febrero 2021Aceptado: 10 marzo 2021

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Samuel P. Huntington , The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster Paperback, 2003 [1996]).
  • Stephen Castles, Hein de Haas, and Mark Miller, The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World, 5th ed. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).
  • Alberto Alesina y Eliana La Ferrara, “Who Trusts Others?”, Journal of Public Economics 85, n.º 2 (2002): 207-34.
  • Robert D. Putnam, “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture”, Scandinavian Political Studies 30, n.º 2 (2007): 137-74.
  • Peter Dinsen y Kim Sønderskov, “Trust in a Time of Increasing Diversity: On the Realtionship between Ethnic Heterogeneity and Social Trust in Denmark from 1979 until Today”, Scandinavian Political Studies 35, n.º 4 (2012): 273-94;
  • Marc Hooghe,, Tim Reeskens, Dietlind Stolle y Ann Trappers, “Ethnic Diversity and Generalized Trust in Europe A Cross-National Multilevel Study”, Comparative Political Studies 42, n.º 2 (2009): 198-223;
  • Henrik Lolle y Lars Torpe, “Growing Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust in European Societies. Comparative European Politics”, Comparative European Politics 9, n.º 2 (2011): 191-216;
  • Patrick Sturgis, Ian BruntonSmith, Sanna Read y Nick Allum, “Does Ethnic Diversity Erode Trust? Putnam’s “Hunkering down” Thesis Reconsidered”, British Journal of Political Science 41, n.º 1 (2011): 57-82.
  • Conrad Ziller, “Ethnic Diversity, Economic and Cultural Contexts, and Social Trust: Cross-Sectional and Longitudianal Evdidence from European Regions, 2002-2010”, Social Forces 93, n.º 3 (2014): 12-34.
  • Eric M. Uslaner, The Moral Foundations of Trust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 21.
  • Jan Delhey, Kenneth Newton y Christian Welzel, “How General Is Trust in ‘Most People’? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem”, American Sociological Review 76, n.º 5 (2011): 787.
  • Uslaner, The Moral Foundations…; Kenneth Newton y Sonja Zmerli, “Three Forms of Trust and Their Associates”, European Political Science Review 3, n.º 5 (2011): 169-200.
  • Michael Beck y Karl-Dieter Opp, “Der Faktorielle Survey und die Messung von Normen”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 52, n.º 2 (2001): 283-306.
  • 2 Cheryl S. Alexander y Henry J. Becker, “The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research”, Public Opinion Quarterly 42, n.º 1 (1978): 93-104
  • Jan Delhey, Kenneth Newton y Christian Welzel, “How General Is Trust in “Most People”? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem”, American Sociological Review 76, n.º 5 (2011): 787.
  • Eric M. Uslaner y Richard S. Conley, “Civic Engagement and Particularized Trust: The Ties That Bind People to Their Ethnic Communities”, American Politics Research 31, n.º 4 (2003): 331-60.
  • Tom Van der Meer y Jochem Tolsma, “Ethnic Diversity and Its Effect on Social Cohesion”, Annual Review of Sociology 40 (2014): 459-78.
  • Marc Hooghe, “Social Capital and Diversity. Generalized Trust, Social Cohesion and Regimes of Diversity”, Canadian Journal of Political Science 40, n.º 3 (2007): 709-32.
  • Michael Hogg y Domic Abrams, Social Identifications. A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes (London: Routledge, 1988).
  • Walter G Stephan,, Oscar Ybarra y Kimberly Rios, “Intergroup Threat Theory”, en Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination, ed. por Todd D. Nelson (New York: Psychology Press, 2016), 255-78
  • Gordon W. Allport, The Nature of Prejudice. (Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1958 [1954]);
  • Thomas F. Pettigrew, “Intergroup Conflict Theory”, Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1998): 65-85.
  • Henry Tajfel y Jon Turner, “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Beahvior”, en Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. por Stephen Worchel y William Austin, 2da edición (Chicago: Nell Hall, 1986):7-24;
  • Michael Hogg y Domic Abrams, Social Identifications. A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes (London: Routledge, 1988).
  • Hubert Blalock, Toward a Therory of Minority-Group Realtions (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967);
  • Jay W Jackson, “Realistic Group Conflict Theory: A Review and Evaluation of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature”, The Psychological Record 43, n.º 3 (1993): 395-413;
  • Jaak Billiet, Bart Meuleman y Hans De Witte, “The Relationship between Ethnic Threat and Economic Insecurity in Times of Economic Crisis: Analysis of European Social Survey Data”, Migration Studies 2, n.º 2 (2014): 135-61.
  • Walter G. Stephan, Oscar Ybarra, Carmen Martínez Martínez y Joseph Schwarzwald, “Prejudice toward Immigrants to Spain and Israel. An Integrated Threat Theory Analysis”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29, n.º 4 (1998): 559-76; Stephan, Ybarra y Rios, “Intergroup Threat Theory…”.
  • Bram Lancee y Japp Dronkers, “Ethnic Diversity in Neighborhoods and Individual Trust of Immigrants and Natives: A Replication of Putman (2007) in a West-European Country”,en International Conference on Theoretical Perspectives on Social Cohesion and Social Capital (Brussels: Royal Flemish Academy for Science and the Arts, 2008).
  • Zmerli, Sonja y Kenneth Newton. “Winners, Losers and Three Types of Trust” en Political Trust. Why Context Matters, editado por Sonja Zmerli y Marc Hooghe, 67-94. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2011.
  • Melissa Williams, Voice, Trust, and Memory. Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998)
  • 46 Kenneth Newton, “Social and Political Trust”,en The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. por Russell J. Dalton y Hans-Dieter Klingemann,.(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007): 342-61.
  • Ronald Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997)
  • Peter H. Rossi y Andy B. Anderson, “The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction”, en Measuring Social Judgments. The Factorial Survey Approach, ed. por Peter H. Rossi y Steven L. Nock,. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982): 15-67;
  • Guillermina Jasso, “Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments”, Sociological Methods & Research 34, n.º 3 (2006): 334-423;
  • Katrin Auspurg y Thomas Hinz, Factorial Survey Experiments, Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences (Sage. Newbury Park, 2006).
  • Rossi, Peter H. y Andy B. Anderson. “The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction”. En Measuring Social Judgments. The Factorial Survey Approach, editado por Peter H. Rossi y Steven L. Nock, 15-67. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 198
  • Warren F. Kuhfeld, “Experimental Design: Efficiency, Coding, and Choice Designs” en Marketing Research Methods in SAS. Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques, ed. por Warren F. Kuhfeld,. (Cary, NC: SAS-Institute TS-722, 2010), 53-241.
  • Warren F. Kuhfeld, Randall D. Tobias y Mark Garratt, “Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications”. Journal of Marketing Research 31, n.º 4 (1994): 545-57.
  • Hermann Dülmer, “The Factorial Survey: Design Selection and Its Impact on Reliability and Internal Validity”, Sociological Methods & Research 45, n.º 2 (2016): 304-47
  • Tom A.B. Snijders y Roel J. Bosker, “Modeled Variance in Two-Level Models”. Sociological Methods & Research 22, n.º 3 (1994): 342–63