Context dependency as a Function of Prediction Error-Based Attention

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abad M. J. Ramos-Álvarez M. M. & Rosas J. M. (2009). Partial reinforcement and context switch effects in human predictive learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology62 174-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701855561
• Alcalá J. A. Callejas-Aguilera J. E. Lamoureux J. A. & Rosas J. M. (2019). Discrimination reversal facilitates subsequent acquisition of temporal discriminations in rats’ appetitive conditioning. Manuscript under review.
• Alcalá J. A. Callejas-Aguilera J. E. Nelson B. & Rosas J. M. (2019). Reversal training facilitates acquisition of new learning in a Morris water maze. Manuscript under review.
• Aristizabal J. A. Ramos-Álvarez M. M. Callejas-Aguilera J. E. & Rosas J. M. (2016). Attention to irrelevant contexts decreases as training increases: Evidence from eye-fixations in a human predictive learning task. Behavioural Processes124 66-73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.12.008
• Beesley T. Hanafi G. Vadillo M. A. Shanks D. R. & Livesey E. J. (2018). Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set but not by the predictiveness of distractors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 44 707-721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000467
• Beesley T. Nguyen K. P. Pearson D. & Le Pelley M. E. (2015). Uncertainty and predictiveness determine attention to cues during human associative learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology68 2175-2199. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1009919
• Bernal-Gamboa R. Callejas-Aguilera J. E. Nieto J. & Rosas J. M. (2013). Extinction Makes Conditioning Time-Dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes39 221-232. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0558-1
• Bernal-Gamboa R. Nieto J. & Rosas J. M. (2015). Context specificity of taste aversion is boosted by pre-exposure and conditioning with a different taste. Behavioural Processes120 111-115. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.008
• Bernal-Gamboa R. Rosas J. M. & Callejas-Aguilera J. E. (2014). Experiencing extinction within a task makes non extinguished information learned within a different task context-dependent. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21 803-808. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0558-1
• Bernal-Gamboa R. Rosas J. M. & Nieto J. (2018). Extinction makes acquisition context-specific in conditioned taste aversion regardless of the context where acquisition and testing take place. Journal of Experimental Psychology.Animal Learning and Cognition 44(4) 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000183
• Bouton M. E. (1993). Context time and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin114 80-99. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80
• Bouton M. E. (1994). Conditioning remembering and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes20 219-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.20.3.219
• Bouton M. E. (1997). Signals for whether versus when an event will occur. In M. S. Fanselow & M. E. Bouton (Eds.) Learning motivation and cognition: The functional behaviorism of Robert C. Bolles (pp. 385-409). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10223-019
• Bouton M. E. (2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory 11 485-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.78804
• Bouton M. E. & Bolles R. C. (1979). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation 10 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(79)90057-2
• Bouton M. E. & Brooks D. C. (1993). Time and context effects on performance in a pavlovian discrimination reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.19.2.165
• Bouton M. E. Kenney F. A. & Rosengard C. (1990). State-dependent fear extinction with two benzodiazepine tranquilizers. Behavioral Neuroscience 104 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.104.1.44
• Bouton M. E. & Peck C. A. (1989). Context effects on conditioning extinction and reinstatement in an appetitive conditioning preparation. Animal Learning and Behavior 17 188-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207634
• Bouton M. E. & Ricker S. T. (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning & Behavior 22 317-324. http://doi:10.3758/BF03209840
• Bouton M. E. & Sunsay C. (2001). Contextual control of appetitive conditioning: Influence of a contextual stimulus generated by a partial reinforcement procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54B 109-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000190
• Bouton M. E. Todd T. P. Vurbic D. & Winterbauer N. (2011). Renewal after the extinction of free operant behavior. Learning & Behavior 39 57-67. http://dx.doi.org//10.3758/s13420-011-0018-6
• Bower G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American psychologist36 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129
• Callejas-Aguilera J. E. Cubillas C. P. & Rosas J. M. (2019). Attentional Instructions Modulate Differential Context-Switch Effects after Short and Long Training in Human Predictive Learning. Manuscript under review.
• Callejas-Aguilera J. E. & Rosas J. M. (2010). Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes36 482-494. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018527
• Cañadas E. Rodríguez-Bailón R. Milliken B. & Lupiáñez J. (2013). Social Categories as a Context for the Allocation of Attentional Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General142 934-943. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0029794
• Cobos P. L. González-Martín E. Varona-Moya S. & López F. J. (2013). Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: Further evidence for associative retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 39 299-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033528
• Effting M. & Kindt M. (2007). Contextual control of human fear associations in a renewal paradigm. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45 2002.
• Darby R. J. & Pearce J. M. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 21 143-154. http://doi:10.1037/0097-7403.21.2.143
• García-Gutiérrez A. & Rosas J. M. (2003). Context change as the mechanism of reinstatement in causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes29 292-310. http://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.29.4.292
• George D. N. & Kruschke J. K. (2012). Contextual modulation of attention in human category learning. Learning & Behaviour 40 530-541. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-012-0072-8
• Godden D. R. & Baddeley A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of psychology66 325-331. http://doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x
• Grillon C. Alvarez R. P. Johnson L. & Chavis C. (2008). Contextual specificity of extinction of delay but not trace eyeblink conditioning in humans. Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor N.Y.) 15 387-389. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.855708
• Hall G. & Channel S. (1985). Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes11470- 481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.11.3.470
• Hall G. & Rodriguez G. (2010). Associative and nonassociative processes in latent inhibition: An elaboration of the Pearce-Hall model. Latent inhibition: Cognition neuroscience and applications to schizophrenia 114-136. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730184.007
• Kraemer P. J. & Roberts. W. A (1984). The influence of flavor preexposure and test interval on conditioned taste aversions in the rat. Learning and Motivation15 259- 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(84)90022-5
• Lattal K. M. Mullen M. T. & Abel T. (2003). Extinction renewal and spontaneous recovery of a spatial preference in the water maze. Behavioral Neuroscience117 1017–1028. http://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.117.5.1017
• Le Pelley M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57B 193–243. http://doi.org/10.1080/02724990344000141
• Le Pelley M.E. Haselgrove M. & Esber G.R. (2012). Modeling attention in associative learning: Two processes or one? Learning & Behavior 40 292-304. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-012-0084-4
• Le Pelley M.E. Mitchell C.J. Beesley T. George D.N. & Wills A. J. (2016). Attention and associative learning in humans: An integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin 142 1111-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000064
• León S. P. Abad M. J. F. & Rosas J. M. (2010). Giving contexts informative value makes information context-specific. Experimental Psychology57 46-53. http://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000006
• León S. P. Abad M. J. F. & Rosas J. M. (2011). Context-outcome associations mediate context-switch effects in a human predictive learning task. Learning and Motivation42 84-98. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2010.10.001
• Liberman A. M. (1951). A comparison of transfer effects during acquisition and extinction of two instrumental responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0062259Google Scholar
• Lucke S. Lachnit H. Koenig S. & Uengoer M. (2013). The informational value of contexts affects context-dependent learning. Learning & Behavior41 285–297. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-013-0104-z
• Lucke S. Lachnit H. Stüttgen M. C. & Uengoer M. (2014). The impact of context relevance during extinction learning. Learning & Behavior42 256-269. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-014-0143-0
• Mackintosh N.J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review 82 276-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076778
• Nelson J. B. (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli. Learning and Motivation 33 284-310. http://doi.org/10.1006/lmot.2001.1112
• Nelson J. B. (2009). Contextual control of first- and second-learned excitation and inhibition in equally ambiguous stimuli. Learning & Behavior 37 95-106. http://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.1.95
• Nelson J. B. & Lamoureux J. A. (2015). Contextual control of conditioning is not affected by extinction in a behavioral task with humans. Learning & Behavior 43 163-178. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-015-0170-5.
• Nelson J. B. Lombas S. & Léon S. P. (2011). Concurrent extinction does not render appetitive conditioning context specific. Learning & Behavior39 87-94. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-011-0023-9
• Nelson J.B. & Sanjuan M.C. (2006). A context-specific latent inhibition effect in a human conditioned suppression task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology59 1003-1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500417738
• Nelson J. B. Sanjuan M. D. C. Vadillo-Ruiz S. Pérez J. & León S. P. (2011). Experimental renewal in human participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes37 58–70. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020519
• Neumann D. L. (2007). The resistance of renewal to instructions that devalue the role of contextual cues in a conditioned suppression task with humans. Learning and Motivation38 105-127. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2006.11.002
• Nowak A. Werka T. & Knapska E. (2013). Social modulation in extinction of aversive memories. Behavioural Brain Research238 200–205. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.031
• Ogallar P. M. Ramos-Álvarez M. M. Alcalá J. A. Moreno-Fernández M. M. & Rosas J. M. (2017). Attentional perspectives on context-dependence of information retrieval. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy17 121-136.
• Pearce J.M. & Hall G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review87 532-552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532
• Pearce J. M. & Mackintosh N. J. (2010). Two theories of attention: A review and a possible integration. In C. J. Mitchell & M. E. Le Pelley (Eds.) Attention and Associative Learning: From Brain to Behaviour (pp. 11-40) New York: Oxford University Press.
• Peck C. A. & Bouton M. E. (1990). Context and performance in aversive-to-appetitive and appetitive-to-aversive transfer. Learning and Motivation21 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(90)90002-6
• Preston G. C. Dickinson A. & Mackintosh N. J. (1986). Contextual conditional discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology38 217-237. http://doi.10.1080/14640748608402230
• Rescorla R. A. (2008). Within-subject renewal in sign tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61 1793-1802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210701790099.
• Rosas J. M. & Bouton M. E. (1998). Context change and retention interval can have additive rather than interactive effects after taste aversion extinction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review5 79–83. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209459
• Rosas J. M. & Callejas-Aguilera J. E. (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition32 461-74. http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.461.
• Rosas J. M. Callejas-Aguilera J. E Ramos-Álvarez M. M. & Abad M. J. (2006). Revision of Retrieval Theory of Forgetting: What does Make Information Context-Specific? International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy6 147-166.
• Rosas J. M. García-Gutiérrez A. & Callejas-Aguilera J. E. (2006). Effects of context change upon retrieval of first and second-learned information in human predictive learning. Psicológica 27 35-56.
• Rosas J. M. Vila N. J. Lugo M. & López L. (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval upon interference in causality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 27 153–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.27.2.153
• Schmajuk N. A. Lam Y. W. & Gray J. A. (1996). Latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes22(3) 321- 349 https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.22.3.321
• Shanab M. E. & Cotton J. W. (1970). Effects of runway training on behavior in the T-maze. Psychonomic Science 19(3) 129-130. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335510
• Smith S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory 5 460-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.5.460
• Thomas B. L. Larsen N. & Ayres J. J. B. (2003). Role of context similarity in ABA ABC and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias. Learning and Motivation 34 410-436. http://doi:10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00037-7
• Thrailkill E. A. & Bouton M. E. (2017). Effects of outcome devaluation on instrumental behaviors in a discriminated heterogeneous chain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition 43 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000119
• Üngör M. & Lachnit H. (2008). Dissociations among ABA ABC and AAB recovery effects. Learning and Motivation 39 181-195. http://doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2007.08.001
• Vervliet B. Vansteenwegen D. Baeyens F. Hermans D. & Eelen P. (2005). Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a stimulus change after extinction. Behaviour Research and Therapy 43 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.005
• Vila N. J. & Rosas J. M. (2001). Renewal and spontaneous recovery after extinction in a causal-learning task. Revista Mexicana De Análisis De La Conducta 27 79-96. Retrieved from http://rmac-mx.org/renewal-and-spontaneous-recovery-after-extinction-in-a-causal-learning-task/
• Wagner A R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.) Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
• Westbrook R F. Jones M. L. Bailey G. K. & Harris J. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 26 157- 173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.26.2.157