Las industria culturales y creativas en la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vascocaracterísticas, evolución y distribución espacial

  1. Enrique Seco 1
  2. Xabier Gainza 2
  1. 1 Ayuntamiento de Vitoria-Gasteiz, España
  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, España
Revista:
Lurralde: Investigación y espacio

ISSN: 0211-5891

Año de publicación: 2018

Número: 41

Páginas: 33-53

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Lurralde: Investigación y espacio

Resumen

This paper analyzes the culture and creative sector in the Basque Autonomous Community in order to understand their role in the Basque economy, their evolution during the past eight years and their spatial distribution, based on Eustat data. Our analysis shows that culture and creative industries represent 5.7% of total Basque firms, a percentage that is greater than that of the State and similar to Cataluña. Besides, the share of this sector has remained relatively stable during the recession, which reflects the dynamism of the sector. Regarding their spatial distribution, culture industries agglomerate in urban areas and some counties that have a long cultural tradition. The reasons for this localization pattern seems to be due to demand side factors, i.e. proximity to consumers, and supply side factors, i.e., the endowment of creative infrastructures, the existence of related firms and the diversity that characterize cities.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AAVV de La Ribera., 2015. ¿La Ribera Vs. “Zorrozaurre”? 10 Años Después Del Master Plan. Bilbao: AAVV Euskaldunako Zubia and Ayuntamiento de Bilbao.
  • COSTA, P., 2013. The importance of gatekeeping processes and reputation building in the sustainability of creative milieus: Evidence from case studies in Lisbon, Barcelona and Sao Paulo. In: L. LAZZERETTI ed., Creative industries and innovation in Europe. Concepts, measures and comparative case studies. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 286-306.
  • CURRID, E., 2007. How Art and Culture Happen in New York: Implications for Urban Economic Development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 12/31; 2014/05, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 454-467 ISSN 0194-4363. DOI 10.1080/01944360708978526.
  • DCMS., 1998. Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: DCMS.
  • European Commission., 2010. Green Paper: Unlocking the Potential of Cultural and Creative Industries. Brussels: European Commission.
  • GAINZA, X., 2016. Culture-Led Neighbourhood Transformations Beyond the revitalisation/ gentrification Dichotomy. Urban Studies, vol. 00, pp. 1-18. Disponible en: http://usj.sagepub. com/content/early/2016/02/11/0042098016630507.abstract.
  • GARCIA, B., 2005. Deconstructing the City of Culture: The Long-Term Cultural Legacies of
  • Glasgow 1990. Urban Studies, vol. 42, no. 5-6, pp. 841-868.
  • Generalitat de Catalunya., 2016. Estadísticas Culturales De Cataluña. Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Cultura.
  • Gobierno Vasco., 2014. Industrias Culturales y Creativas En Euskadi: Presente y Futuro. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.
  • HARTLEY, J., 2005. Creative industries. In: J. HARTLEY ed., Creative industries. Oxford: Blackwell Pub. Creative Industries, pp. 1-40.
  • HUTTON, T.A., 2009. The Inner City as Site of Cultural Production Sui Generis: A Review Essay. Geography Compass, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 600-629.
  • LAZZERETTI, L. and CINTI, T., 2013. From cultural cluster to creative cluster. The case of art restoration in Florence. In: L. LAZZERETTI ed., Creative industries and innovation in Europe. Concepts, measures and comparative case studies. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 175-193.
  • LEES, L., SLATER, T. and WYLY, E., 2008. Gentrification. New York: Routledge.
  • LEY, D., 2003. Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification. Urban Studies, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2527-2544.
  • LORENZEN, M. and FREDERIKSEN, L., 2008. Why do Cultural Industries Cluster? Localization, Urbanization, Products and Projects. Creative Cities, Cultural Clusters and Local Economic Development, pp. 155-179.
  • Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes., 2016. Plan De Fomento De Las Industrias Culturales y Creativas 2016. Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica.
  • MOMMAAS, H., 2004. Cultural Clusters and the Post-Industrial City: Towards the Remapping of Urban Cultural Policy. Urban Studies, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 507-532.
  • PLAZA, B., 2006. The Return on Investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 452-467.
  • PLAZA, B., TIRONI, M. and HAARICH, S.N., 2009. Bilbao’s Art Scene and the “Guggenheim Effect” Revisited. European Planning Studies, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1711-1729.
  • PRATT, A.C., 2008. Creative Cities: The Cultural Industries and the Creative Class. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 107-117.
  • PRATT, A.C., 2009. Urban Regeneration: From the Arts `Feel Good’ Factor to the Cultural Economy: A Case Study of Hoxton, London. Urban Studies, vol. 46, no. 5-6, pp. 1041-1061.
  • RICHARDS, G. and WILSON, J., 2004. The Impact of Cultural Events on City Image: Rotterdam, Cultural Capital of Europe 2001. Urban Studies, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1931-1951.
  • RIUS ULLDEMOLINS, J., 2014. Culture and Authenticity in Urban Regeneration Processes: Place Branding in Central Barcelona. Urban Studies, vol. 51, no. 14, pp. 3026-3045.
  • SCOTT, A.J., 2006. Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions. Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1-17.
  • SMIT, A.J., 2011. The Influence of District Visual Quality on Location Decisions of Creative Entrepreneurs. Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 167-184.
  • STERN, M.J. and SEIFERT, S.C., 2010. Cultural Clusters: The Implications of Cultural Assets Agglomeration for Neighborhood Revitalization. Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 262-279.
  • THROSBY, D., 2008. Modelling the Cultural Industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 08/01; 2014/05, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 217-232.
  • UIS., 2009. 2009 UNESCO Framework for Cultural Statistics. UIS ed., Montreal: UIS.
  • VICARIO, L. and MARTINEZ MONJE, P.M., 2003. Another ‘Guggenheim Effect’? the Generation of a Potentially Gentrifiable Neighbourhood in Bilbao. Urban Studies, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2383-2400.
  • ZUKIN, S., et al, 2009. New Retail Capital and Neighborhood Change: Boutiques and Gentrification in New York City. City & Community, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47-64.
  • ZUKIN, S. and BRASLOW, L., 2011. The Life Cycle of New York’s Creative Districts: Reflections on the Unanticipated Consequences of Unplanned Cultural Zones. City, Culture and Society, 9, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 131-140.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet