Resistencias a los avances del feminismo en artículos de opinión en la prensa vasca

  1. Rodríguez, María Pilar 1
  2. Pérez Tirado, Irene 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

Journal:
Anàlisi: Quaderns de comunicació i cultura

ISSN: 0211-2175,  2340-5236

Year of publication: 2020

Issue: 0

Pages: 85-98

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ANALISI.3252 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Anàlisi: Quaderns de comunicació i cultura

Abstract

Through the analysis of opinion articles in the daily press of the Basque Autonomous Community (CAV), this article analyzes the resistance and objections to the advances of feminism. It explores 139 opinion articles during the months of January, February and March of 2018. Resistances represent an important force of obstruction in the processes of integration of the gender perspective and seek to preserve the prevailing order in a society instead of questioning it. Four main themes of analysis are elaborated, and the conclusions show that in times in which feminist advances are clearly linked to social, political and cultural events that seek to overturn the established order, there is a strong reaction that shows resistances and obstacles. Feminism is labeled as exaggerated, maximalist, rigid, victimizing, puritan and ignorant. Radical and left-wing feminism is accused of being exclusive and of not defending women of the right or women who do not agree with its principles. The articles translate a vision offered to the readership into an opportunity to discredit feminism as whole.

Bibliographic References

  • AZPIAZU, J. (2015). «Análisis crítico del discurso con perspectiva feminista». En: I. MENDIA et al. (eds.). Otras formas de (re)conocer. Reflexiones, herramientas y aplicaciones desde la investigación feminista. Bilbao: UPV/EHU, 111-123.
  • BEATLEY, M. (2019). «The shocking rape trial that galvanized Spain’s feminists- and the far right». The Guardian (23-04-2018). Recuperado de https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/23/wolf-pack-case-spain-feminism-far-right-vox [Fecha de consulta: 25/04/2019]
  • CÁCERES, P. (2003). «Análisis de contenido: una alternativa metodológica alcanzable». Psicoperspectivas, 2, 53-82.
  • CARLIN, D. y WINFREY, K. (2009). «Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage». Communication Studies, 60 (4), 326-343.
  • DONOSO-VÁZQUEZ, T. y PRADO-SOTO, N. (2014). «Neomachismos en espacios virtuales». En: Violencia de género 2.0. Barcelona: Kit-Books, 47-56.
  • EQUIPO DE INVESTIGACIÓN GÉNERO Y MEDIOS DE COMUNICACIÓN (2006). Tratamiento de la violencia de género en la prensa vasca. San Sebastián: Universidad de Deusto.
  • FULCHER, R. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis. Londres y Nueva York: Longman.
  • HOWITT, D. y CRAMER, D. (2010). Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology. 2a ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • JOVANOVSKI, N. y TYLER, M. (2018). «Bitch, You Got What You Deserved! Violation and Violence in Sex Buyers Reviews of Legal Brothels». Violence Against Women, 24 (16), 1.887-1.908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218757375
  • KIM, S. (2008). «Feminist Discourse and the Hegemonic Role of Mass Media». Feminist Media Studies, 8 (4), 391-406.
  • LAZAR, M. (2007). «Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis». Critical Discourse Studies, 4 (2), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
  • LOCKHART, P. R. (2017). «How the #MeToo movement can survive a brewing backlash». Vox (22 de diciembre de 2017). Recuperado de https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/12/22/16803346/metoo-movement-backlash. [Fecha de consulta: 19/02/2019]
  • MARCOS, J. (2018). «Montero defiende decir “portavoza” para dar visibilidad a las mujeres». El País (9 de febrero de 2018). Recuperado de https://elpais.com/politica/2018/02/08/actualidad/1518079927_468582.html [Fecha de consulta: 09/04/2019]
  • MARLING, R. (2010). «The Intimidating Other: Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of Feminism in Estonian Print Media». NORA. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18 (1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038741003626767
  • MOGASHOA, T. (2014). «Understanding Critical Discourse Analysis in Qualitative Research». International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1 (7), 104-113.
  • MORÁN, E. (1998). Géneros del periodismo de opinión. Crítica, comentario, columna, editorial. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
  • MORETTI, J. (2019). «La RAE y el lenguaje inclusivo». Letras, 7, 25-31.
  • OHITO, E. O. y NYACHAE, T. M. (2018). «Poetically Poking at Language and Power: Using Black Feminist Poetry to Conduct Rigorous Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis». Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418786303
  • PARSON, L. (2016). «Are STEM Syllabi Gendered? A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis». The Qualitative Report, 21 (1), 102-116.
  • RODRÍGUEZ, M. P. (ed.). (2012). Representaciones de las mujeres políticas en la prensa. Bilbao: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Deusto.
  • SAYAGO, S. (2014). «El análisis del discurso como técnica de investigación cualitativa y cuantitativa en las ciencias sociales». Cinta Moebio, 49, 1-10.
  • SHAPIRO, B. (2017). «Examining Portrayals of Female Protagonists by Female Screenwriters Using Feminist Critical Discourse». The Young Researcher, 1 (1), 37-47.
  • VAN DEN BRINK, M. y BENSCHOP, Y. (2014). «Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment». Journal of Management Studies, 51 (3), 460-492.
Data source: Dialnet