Análisis de impacto del Plan Nacional Integrado de Energía y Clima (PNIEC) 2021-2030 de España (*)

  1. Mikel GONZÁLEZ-EGUINO 1
  2. Iñaki ARTO 1
  3. Alejandro RODRÍGUEZ-ZÚÑIGA 1
  4. Xaquin GARCÍA-MUROS 1
  5. Jon SAMPEDRO 1
  6. Kurt KRATENA 1
  7. Ignacio CAZCARRO 1
  8. Alevgul H. SORMAN 1
  9. Cristina PIZARRO-IRÍZAR 1
  10. María José SANZ-SÁNCHEZ 1
  1. 1 BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change
    info

    BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change

    Lejona, España

Journal:
Papeles de economía española

ISSN: 0210-9107

Year of publication: 2020

Issue: 163

Pages: 9-22

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Papeles de economía española

Abstract

This article analyses the impact of the draft of the National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan (PNIEC) 2021-2030 of Spain, whose main objective is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 23% compared to 1990. The study uses several models (DENIO and FASTT-TM5) to address impacts in an integrated and multidisciplinary way. The results obtained show that PNIEC would mobilize 241 billion euros, of which 80% would come from private financing. The PNIEC measures would reduce the imports of fossil fuels by 67 billion euros, which will be replaced by local renewable energies, and would generate a GDP increase of 1.8% in 2030 and new net employment between 253,000 and 348,000 jobs/year. The reduction of GHGs, is associated with a significant reduction of emissions of air pollutants that cause damage to health (such as SO2, NOX or PM2.5), which would mean a reduction of 27% of premature deaths. A robust conclusion of this work, similar to that of other recent studies (OECD, 2017; Comisión Europea, 2018; FUNSEAM, 2018 or IRENA, 2019), reveals that solutions for the climate crisis are not only urgent and necessary, but also present an opportunity, especially if they are well developed for countries that are net importers of fossil fuels and have renewable resources

€ View funding

Funding information

Agradecen la cofinanciación del Gobierno Vasco a través del programa BERC 2018-2021 y del Gobierno de España a través de la acreditación de BC3 como centro María de Maeztu (MDM-2017-0714) y MINECO (RTI2018-093352-B-I00)

Funders

  • María de Maeztu Spain
    • MDM-2017-0714
  • MINECO Spain
    • RTI2018-093352-B-I00

Bibliographic References

  • Burnett, R. T., Pope, C. A., III , Ezzati, M. et al. (2014). An Integrated Risk Function for Estimating the Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Exposure. Environ. Health Perspect, 122(9), A235.
  • Burnett, R., Chen, H., Szyszkowicz, M. et al. (2018). Global estimates of mortality associated with long-termexposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(38), pp. 9592-9597
  • Comisión Europea (2018). Clean planet for all: A European longt e r m s t r a t e g i c v i s i o n f o r a prosperous, modern, competitive, and climate neutral economy. COM2016 860 final, Brussels: European Commission. https://eurlex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773
  • Comisión Europea (2019). United in delivering the Energy Union and climate action - setting the foundations for a successful clean energy transition. COM/2019/285 final. Brussels: European Commission. https:// ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/ files/documents/recommondation_ en.pdf
  • Eurofound (2019). Energy scenario: Employment implications of the Paris Climate Agreement. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Forouzanfar, M. H., Afshin, A., Alexander, L. T. et al. (2016). Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015. Lancet 8; 388(10053), pp. 1659-1724.
  • IRENA (2019). G l o b a l e n e r g y transformation: A roadmap to 2050. International Renewable Energy Agency.
  • Kratena, K., Streicher, G., Temu rshoev, U. et al. (2013). FIDELIO 1: Fully Interregional Dynamic Econometric Long-term Input-Output Model for the EU27. Luxembourg. European Commission. ISBN 978-92-79- 30009-7.
  • Kratena, K., Streicher, G., Salotti, S. et al. (2017). FIDELIO 2: Overview and theoretical foundations of the second version of the Fully Interregional Dynamic Econometric Long-term Input-Output model for the EU-27. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. ISBN 978-92-79-66258-4.
  • Markandya, A., Sampedro, J., Smith, S. J. et al. (2018). Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 2, pp.126-e133.
  • O C D E ( 2 0 1 6 ) . T h e E c o n o m i c Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution, 2016. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • O C D E (2017). Investing in Climate, investing in Growth. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • OMS (2015). Economic Cost of the Health Impact of Air Pollution in Europe: Clean Air. Organización Mundial de la Salud.
  • PNIEC (2020). Borrador actualizado del Plan Nacional Integrado de Energía y Clima 2021-2030. Madrid: Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y Reto Demográfico.
  • Van Dingenen, R., Dentener, F., Crippa, M. et al. (2018). TM5-FASST: a global atmospheric source-receptor model for rapid impact analysis of emission changes on air quality and shortlived climate pollutants. Atmos Chem Phys, 18, pp. 16173-16211.
Data source: Dialnet