Metodología cualitativa para enfocar la mirada cuantitativala experiencia de los pretest cognitivos aplicados a la Encuesta de Salud del País Vasco

  1. Martín, Unai
  2. González-Rábago, Yolanda
Aldizkaria:
Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 1139-5737

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Zenbakia: 43

Orrialdeak: 137-158

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.5944/EMPIRIA.43.2019.24302 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales

Laburpena

In survey research, response errors are very relevant, although strategies to minimize them are rarely used. The article shows the experience with one of these strategies, cognitive pretests, in the Health Survey of the Basque Country. Potential response errors were identified through cognitive interviews to people of different sociodemographic and health profiles. Response errors were classified according to the components of the question-and-answer process and used to make proposals for improving the questionnaire. A total of 83 response errors were collected, specially related to errors of comprehension (40) and response (20). The article describes a process and gives visibility to a methodology not much known in our context, which in this case contributed to the identification of possible biases and errors in the design of questionnaires, and to the reflection on the complementarity of quantitative and qualitative methods for a better understanding of social reality.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • CAStIllo, M. (2009): Utilidad de los Métodos de Pretest para la Evaluación de los Cuestionarios en la Investigación mediante Encuesta. tesis Doctoral. Granada, Universidad de Granada.
  • CAStIllo-Dí Az, M. y PADIllA, J. (2013): “How Cognitive Interviewing Can Provide Validity Evidence of the response Processes to Scale Items”. Social Indicators research 12/01;114(3), pp. 963-975.
  • CollInS, D. (2003): “Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods”. Quality of life research, 12, pp. 229-238.
  • GArCIA, A. (2011): “Cognitive Interviews to test and refine Questionaires”. Public Health nursing. 28(5), pp. 444-450.
  • GEyEr, S. (2003a): “testing questionnaires with cognitive methods: part I, Probing questions”. Soz-Präventivmed, 48, pp. 133-134.
  • GEyEr, S. (2003b): “testing questionnaires with cognitive methods: part 2, thinkalouds”. Soz-Präventivmed, 48, pp. 392-393.
  • HorWooD, J. et al. (2010). “listening to patients: using verbal data in the validation of the Aberdeen Measures of Impairment, Activity limitation and Participation restriction (Ab-IAP)”. bMS Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11:182.
  • JAbInE, tb. et al. (1984): Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines. Washington DC, national Academy Press.
  • lAKE, AA. et al. (2007): “Development of a series of patient information leaflets for constipation using a range of cognitive interview techniques: lIElAX”. bMC Health Services research. 7:3.
  • lÓPEz, M. y álVArEz, r. (2007): “Pretest cognitivos del cuestionario de la Encuesta nacional de Salud 2006 y de la traducción al español del Módulo Europeo de Estado de Salud”. Metodología de Encuestas, 9, pp. 43-56.
  • MAllInSon, S. (2002): “listening to respondents: a qualitative assesment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire”. Social Science and Medicine, 54, pp. 11-21.
  • MIllEr, K.; WIllSon, S.; CHEPP, V. y PADIllA Jl. (ed) (2014): Cognitive interviewing methodology. new Jersey, Willey.
  • PloUGHMAn; M. et al. (2010): “Applying cognitive debriefing to pre-test patientreported outcomes in older people with multiple sclerosis”. Quality life research, 19, pp.483-487
  • PrESSEr, S. et al. (2004): Methods for testing and evaluation survey questions. nueva Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.
  • rEQUEnA; Ml.; SUárEz, M.; PÉrEz o.; y Grupo técnico de Encuestas de Salud de la Subcomisión de Sistemas de Información del Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema nacional de Salud (2013): “Encuestas de Salud en España: situación actual”. revista Española de Salud Pública, 87, pp. 549-573.
  • toUrAnGEAU, r.; rIPS, lJ. y rASInSKI K. (2000)  : the psychology of survey response. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • WEISbErG, HF. (2005): the total Survey Error Approach: a Guide to the new Science of Survey research. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
  • WIllIS, Gb. (2005): Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. thousands oaks. CA, Sage.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet