Repercusión de la Triple Helix y las Dificultades para Innovar en los Objetivos de InnovaciónEspaña, 2007-2013

  1. María Jesús Luengo-Valderrey 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revista:
Revista de estudios regionales

ISSN: 0213-7585

Año de publicación: 2018

Número: 113

Páginas: 167-192

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de estudios regionales

Resumen

La Triple Helix facilita y favorece la innovación que, a pesar de ser básica para la supervivencia empresarial en épocas de crisis, se ve negativamente afectada por las dificultades percibidas para hacerlo. Esta investigación, realizada con datos del Instituto Nacional de Estadística español, revela que, en las grandes empresas se afianza la relación positiva innovación-Triple Helix; mientras que en las PYMEs carece de importancia, prevaleciendo la incidencia de las dificultades. Las conclusiones animan a las empresas a entablar relaciones de colaboración con los ejes de la Triple Helix, para la adquisición y utilización de conocimiento para innovar.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AGHION, P., & HOWITT, P. (1992): “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-361.
  • ARUNDEL, A. (1997): “Enterprise strategies and barriers to innovation”. En A. Arundel, R. Garrelfs, & E. Comosion (Ed.), Innovation measurement and policies (págs. 101-108). EIMS publications.
  • AUDRETSCHE, D., & KEILBACH, M. (2007): “The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship”. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242-1254.
  • BAGOZZI, R., & YI, Y. (1988): “On the evaluation of structural equation models”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1(16), 74-94.
  • BALDWIN, J., & LIN, Z. (2002): “Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufactures”. Research Policy, 31, 1-18.
  • BECERRA, M., LUNNAN, R., & HUEMER, L. (2008): “Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners·. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 691-713.
  • BELDERBOS, R., CARREE, M., & LOKSHIN, B. (2004): “Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance”. Research Policy, 33, 1477–1492.
  • BENTLER, P. M. (1990): “Comparative fit indexes in structural models”. Psychological Bulletin(107), 238-246.
  • BIANCHINI, S., LISSONI, F., PEZZONI, M., & ZIRULIA, L. (2016): “The economics of research, consulting, and teaching quality: theory and evidence from a technical university”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(7), 668-691.
  • CARAYANNIS, E., & CAMPBELL, D. (2009): Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and use in Innovation Networks and Knowldege Clusters: a Comparative Systems Approach Acrosso the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport: Praeger.
  • CAVALLINI, S., SOLDI, R., FRIEDL, J., & VOLPE, M. (2016): Using the Quadruple Helix Approach to Accelerate the Transfer of Research and Innovation Results to Regional Growth. Brussels: European Union Committee of the Regions.
  • CHESBROUGH, H. (2003): Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
  • COMMISSION EUROPEAN (2010): Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: COM/2010/2020 final.
  • DAHEIM, C., & UERZ, G. (2008): Corporate foresight in europe: From trend based logics to open foresight. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 321-336.
  • DAMANPOUR, F. (1991): “Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”. Academy of Management Journal, I, 555-590.
  • DAMANPOUR, F., & GOPALAKRISHNAN, S. (1998): “Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change”. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 1-17.
  • DODGSON, M. (2014): “Collaboration and innovation management”. En Dodgson, M., D. Gann, & N. Phillips, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • DUNCAN, R. B. (1972): “Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313-327.
  • EDQUIST, C., LUUKKONEN, T., & SOTARAUTA, M. (2009): Broad-Based Innovation Policy, Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System. Helsinki: Taloustieto Ltd.
  • ETZKORWITZ, H., & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations”. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H. (2002): “Networks of innovation: Science, technology and development in the triple helix era”. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 7-20.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H. (2008): The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H., & LEYDESDORFF, L. (1998): “The endless transition: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations”. Minerva, 36, 203-208.
  • FITJAR, R., GJELSVIK, M., & RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. (2014): “Organizing product innovation: hierarchy, market”. The Triple Helix, 1(3), 1-21.
  • FREEL, M. (1998): “Evolution, Innovation and Learning: evidence from Case Studies”. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development Journal, 10(2), 137-149.
  • GALIA, F., & LEGROS, D. (2004): “Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France”. Research Policy, 33, 1185-1199.
  • GARCÍA, D., & MARTÍNEZ, M. (2009): Innovación y Cultura Empresarial de las MIPYME (1 ed.). Aguascalientes, México: Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes y Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena.
  • GAZDA, E., & QUANDT, C. O. (2010): “Colaboração Interinstitucional em Pesquisa no Brasil: Tendências em Artigos na area de Gestão da Inovação”. RAE, 9(2), 1-27.
  • GILL, J., & JOHNSON, P. (2010): Research methods for managers (4 ed.). Londres: Sage Publications.
  • GROSSMAN, G., & HELPMAN, E. (1993): Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • HAGEDOORN, J., LINK, A., & VONORTAS, N. (2000): “Research partnerships”. Research Policy, 29, 567-586.
  • HAIR, J. F., ANDERSON, R. E., TATHAM, R., & BLACK, W. (1995): Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • HARGADON, A., & DOUGLAS, Y. (2001): “When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476-501.
  • HERNÁNDEZ-ESPALLARDO, M., & DELGADO-BALLESTER, E. (2009): “Product innovation in small manufacturers, market orientation and the industry’s five competitive forces: Empirical evidence from Spain”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(4), 470-491.
  • HERRERA, H. (2009): “Investigación sobre redes sociales y emprendimiento: revisión de la literatura y agenda futura”. Innovar, 33, 19-34.
  • HU, L., & BENTLER, P. (1999): “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
  • KOSACOF, B., & LÓPEZ, A. (2000): “Los cambios organizacionales y tecnológicos en las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Repensando el estilo de desarrollo argentino”. Revista de la Escuela de Economía y Negocios, 2(abril), 37-70.
  • LAWSON, B., & SAMSON, D. (2001): “Developing Innovation Capability in Organization”. International Journal of Innovation Managemente, 5(3), 1-23.
  • LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovation”. Research Policy, 29, 243-256.
  • LEYDESDORFF, L. (2012): “The Triple-Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-tuple of Helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?” . Journal of the Kwoledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35.
  • LEYDESDORFF, L., DOLFSMA, W., & VAN DER PANNE, G. (2006): “Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of Triple Helix relations among technology, organization, and territory”. Research Policy, 35, 181-199.
  • LÖÖF, H., & BROSTROM, A. (2008): “Does knowledge diffusion between universities and ndustry increase innovativeness?” Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 73-90.
  • LÓPEZ, A., & LUGONES, G. (1998): “Los tejidos locales ante la globalizacion del cambio tecnológico”. Revista Redes, 12, 13-44.
  • MESQUITA, L. E., & LAZZARINI, S. G. (2008): “Horizontal and vertical relationships in developing economies: Implications for SMEs’ access to global markets”. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 359-380.
  • MIOZZO, M., & DEWICK, P. (2004): “Networks and innovation in European construction:benefits from interorganisational cooperation in a fragmented industry”. International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 68-92.
  • MIRAVITLLES MATAMOROS, P., GUITART TARRÉS, L., ACHCAOUCAOU IALLOUCHEN, F., & NÚNEZ CARBALLOSA, A. (2012): “El papel del entorno en la localización de actividades de I+D en las filiales de multinacionales extranjeras”. Revista Europea de Direccón y Economía de la Empresa, 21(2), 169-181.
  • MOHEN, P., & ROLLER, L. (2005): “Complementarities in innovation policy”. European Economie Review, 24, 1431-1450.
  • MOHEN, P., & ROSA, J. (2000): Les obstacles à l’innovation dans les industries de services au Canada. Montreal: CIRANO Scientific Series.
  • MOHNEN, P., MAIRESSE, J., & DAGENAIS, M. (2006): Innovativity: a comparison across seven European countries. Cambridge: NBER Working Paper Series.
  • MONJON, S., & WALBROECK, P. (2003): “Assessing spillovers from universities to firms:evidence from French firm-level data”. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1255–1270.
  • NELSON, R., & WINTER, S. (1977): “In search of a useful innovation theory”. Research Policy, 6, 36-76.
  • NIETO, M., & SANTAMARIA, L. (2007): “The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation”. Technovation, 27, 367–377.
  • NORTH, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • PERKMANN, M., & WALSH, K. (2007). “University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda”. International journal of management reviews, 9(4), 259-280.
  • PIATIER, A. (1984): Barriers to Innovation. London: Frances Printer.
  • POWELL, W., WHITE, D., KOPUT, K., & OWEN-SMITH, J. (2005): “Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences”. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 132–1205.
  • RADAS, S., & BOŽIć, L. (2009): “The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy”. Technovation, 29(6-7), 438-450.
  • ROBIN, S., & SCHUBER, T. (2013): “Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany”. Research Policy, 42, 149-166.
  • ROMER, P. (1990): !Endogenous technological change”. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 72-10.
  • ROPER, S., DU, J., & LOVE, J. (2008): “Modeling the innovation value chain”. Research Policy, 37, 961-977.
  • RUIZ, M., PARDO, A., & SAN MARTIN, R. (2010): “Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales”. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.
  • SAGUY, S. (2011): “Academia-industry innovation interaction: paradigm shifts and avenues for the future”. Procedia Food Science, 1, 1875-1882.
  • SAVIGNAC, F. (2006): “The impact of financial constraints on innovation: evidence from French manufacturing firms”. Cahiers de la MSE, 42.
  • SCHMOCH, U., & SCHUBERT, T. (2009): “Sustainability of incentives for excellent research – the German case”. Scientometrics, 81, 195-218.
  • SHAZIA, A., AMAT, S., & ARSLAN, U. (2015): “Organization Culture and Open Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Open Innovation Model Approach”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5 (Special Issue), 335-342.
  • THOMÄ, J., & ZIMMERMANN, V. (2016): “Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung”. Innovationshemmnisse in KMU. Eine empirische Analyse unter Berücksichtigung des Handwerks (6), 1-20.
  • TIWARI, A., MOHNEN, P., PALM, F., & VAN DER LOEFF, S. (2007): “Financial constraint and R&D Investment: Evidence from CIS”. United Nations University-MERIT, Working Paper Series (11).
  • TOURIGNY, D., & LE, C. (2004): “Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(3), 217-250.
  • VARGAS, J., MARTÍNEZ, M., & MOJICA, E. (2011): “Influencia de la Orientación al Mercado y la Innovación en la Internacionalización y el Desempeño de las PYMES en el Estado de Aguascalientes”. Revista de Micro e Pequena Empresa, 5(1), 120-133.
  • VASCONCELOS VALE, G., WILKINSON, J., & AMÂNCIO, R. (2008): “Empreendedorismo, inovaçao e redes: Uma nova abordagem”. RAE-Revista de Administraçao de Empresas, 7(1), art. 7, 1-16.
  • WILLIAMS, L., COTE, J., & BUCKLEY, M. R. (1989): “Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artefact?” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462.468.
  • ZIMMERMANN, V. (2012): “Barriers to innovation in SMEs”. KfW Economic Research, 6(6). http://www.kfw.de/ kfw/en/I/II/Download_Center/Research/Fokus_PDF-Datein/Fokus_Nr__6_EN_2012.pdf.
  • ZIMMERMANN, V. (2015): “Innovationsfinanzierung. Herausforderung für mittelständische Unternehmen”. Corporate Finance (6), 183-190.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet