Poverty decomposition in incidence, intensity and inequalitya review

  1. Oihana Aristondo 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Aldizkaria:
Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

ISSN: 0210-1173

Argitalpen urtea: 2018

Zenbakia: 225

Orrialdeak: 109-130

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.7866/HPE-RPE.18.2.4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

Every poverty measure should be expressed as a function of three poverty components; incidence, intensity and inequality among the poor. If it is possible, the sources of changes in poverty will be easier to compute, since we are able to know the contribution of each component to the total poverty change. In this paper, firstly we do a review of the existing poverty decompositions in these three terms. Then, we find new decompositions for some poverty measures and additional ones for others. Summarizing, decompositions in the three terms of poverty can be found for almost all the poverty measures.

€ Ikusi finantzaketa

Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa

O. Aristondo gratefully acknowledge the funding support of Departamento de Educación, Política Lingüistica y Cultura del Gobierno Vasco under the project IT568-13 and the funding support of the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia under the project ECO2015-67519, cofunded by FEDER and UPV/EHU, UFI 11/46 BETS.

Finantzatzaile

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Aristondo O. and Ciommi M. (2016), “The decomposition of the rank-dependent poverty measures using ordered weighted averaging operators”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 76: 47-62.
  • Aristondo O., Lasso de la Vega C. and Urrutia A. M. (2010), “A new multiplicative decomposition for the Foster-Greer-Thorbecke poverty measures”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 62(3): 259-267.
  • Atkinson A. B. (1970), “On the measurement of inequality”, Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 244-263.
  • Blackburn M. (1989), “Poverty Measurement: An Index Related to a Theil Measure of Inequality”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7: 475-481.
  • Chakravarty S. R. (1983), “A new index of poverty”, Mathematical Social Sciences, 6(3): 307-313.
  • Clark S., Hemming R. and Ulph D. (1981), “On indices for the measurement of poverty”, Economic Journal, 91: 515-526.
  • Donaldson D. and Weymark J. A. (1980), “A single-parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality”, Journal of Economic Theory, 22(1): 67-86.
  • Foster J., Greer J. and Thorbecke E. (1984), “A class of decomposable poverty measures”, Econometrica, 52(3): 761-765.
  • Gini C. (1912), Variabilità e Mutabilità. Tipografia di Paolo Cuppini, Bologna.
  • Hagenaars A. (1987), “A Class of Poverty Indices”, International Economic Review, 28: 583-607.
  • Kakwani N. C. (1980), “On a Class of Poverty Measures”, Econometrica, 48: 437-446.
  • Kakwani N. C. (1999), Inequality, welfare and poverty, In J. Silber (ed.). Hand-book of Income Inequality measurement (pp. 599-634), Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
  • Lambert P. (2001), The distribution and redistribution of income, Manchester University Press.
  • Lambert P. and Zheng B. (2011), “On the consistent measurement of achievement and shortfall inequality”, Journal of Health Economics, 30: 214-219.
  • Lasso de la Vega C. and Urrutia A. (2008), “The Extended Atkinson family: The class of multiplicatively decomposable inequality measures and some new graphical procedures for analysts”, Journal of Economic Inequality, 6(2): 211-225.
  • Lasso de la Vega C. and Aristondo O. (2012), “Proposing indicators to measure achievement and shortfall inequality consistently”, Journal of Health Economics, 31(4):578-583.
  • Osberg L. and Xu K. (2000), “International comparisons of poverty intensity: index decomposition and bootstrap inference”, Journal of Human Resources, 35: 1-81.
  • Sen A. K. (1976), “Poverty: an ordinal approach to measurement”, Econometrica, 44: 219-231.
  • Shorrocks A. F. (1984), “Inequality decomposition by population subgroups”, Econometrica, 52: 1369-1385.
  • Shorrocks A. F. (1995), “Revisiting the Sen poverty index”, Econometrica, 63: 1225-1230.
  • Takayama N. (1979), “Poverty, Income Inequality, and Their Measures: Professor Sen’s Axiomatic Approach Reconsidered”, Econometrica, 47: 747-759.
  • Theil H. (1967), Economics and Information Theory, Amsterdam, North Holland.
  • Thon D. (1979), “On measuring poverty”, Review of Income and Wealth, 25 429-440.
  • Thon D. (1983), “A poverty measure”, Indian Economic Journal, 30: 55-70.
  • Watts H. (1968), An Economic Definition of Poverty, In D.P. Moynihan (ed.), On Understanding Poverty. New York: Basic Books.
  • Xu K. and Osberg L. (2002), “The Social Welfare Implications, Decomposability, and Geometry of the Sen Family of Poverty Indices”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 30: 138-152.
  • Zheng B. (1997), “Aggregate Poverty Indices”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(2): 123-162.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet