Is CLIL instruction beneficial in terms of general proficiency and specific areas of grammar?

  1. María Martínez Adrián
  2. María Juncal Gutiérrez Mangado
Aldizkaria:
Journal of immersion and content-based language education

ISSN: 2212-8433

Argitalpen urtea: 2015

Alea: 3

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 51-76

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.1075/JICB.3.1.03ADR DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Journal of immersion and content-based language education

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of CLIL instruction regarding general competence in the acquisition of second languages. However, it is not clear whether these benefits extend to specific areas of grammar. Here we compare the general proficiency and specific linguistic features of a group of learners of L3 English in a CLIL programme with two EFL groups: one matching the CLIL group in age and hours of exposure and a second group two grades ahead. The results confirm that the benefits of CLIL in general competence do not extend to the acquisition of specific linguistic features. In this respect, the best results were obtained by the older EFL learners suggesting that CLIL benefits do not extend to the acquisition of English verbal morphology.