Unibertsitateko irakasleen profesionalizazio baterantzazterketa teorikoa

  1. Alba Madinabeitia
  2. Idoia Fernández
Revista:
Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

ISSN: 0214-9753

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 29

Número: 1

Páginas: 147-168

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1387/TANTAK.17869 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

Resumen

Faculty development is recognized as a relevant factor for improving the quality of education in higher education institutions. However, behind this term different conceptions and practices are hiding. This article aims to analyze the changes and continuities of this concept over time and to understand deeply the complexity of their meanings, for which we will approach the construction of these meanings in their socio-historical contexts of production and scientific research. This perspective of analysis allows us to conclude that it has been moving from an approach oriented to supporting teachers in their development as teachers, professionals and/or academics, towards another, focused on promoting effective teaching and learning processes at micro and macro level. These challenges highlight the need to foster broader visions that, beyond teachers, focus on organizations, frameworks, and infrastructures that target teaching and learning.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Badley, G. (1998). Making a case for educational development in times of drift and shift. Quality Assurance in Education, 6(2), 64-73.
  • Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence: Knowledge, higher education and society. ERIC.
  • Barr, R. B. & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning - A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 12-26.
  • Bland, C. J., Schmitz, C. C., Stritter, F. T., Henry, R. C. & Aluise, J. J. (1990). Successful faculty in academic medicine. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Bligh, J. (2005). Faculty development. Medical Education, 39(2), 120-121.
  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. The Carnegie Foundation for the Ad- vancement of Teaching.
  • Brew, A. (2010). Transforming academic practice through scholarship. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 105-116.
  • — (2007). Evaluating academic development in a time of perplexity. International Journal for Academic Development,12(2), 69-72.
  • Brew, A. & Boud, D. (1996). Preparing for new academic roles: An holistic approach to development. The International Journal for Academic Development, 1(2), 17-25.
  • Centra, J. A. (1978). Types of faculty development programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 49(2), 151-162.
  • Ceylan, F., Fiehn, J., Paetz, N., Schworm, S. & Harteis, C. (2011). Die auswirkungen des bologna-Prozesses–Eine expertise der hochschuldidaktik. In S. Nic- kel (Hg.), Der Bologna-Prozess Aus Sicht Der Hochschulforschung (pp. 106- 122). Gütersloh: Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung.
  • Chalmers, D. (2012). Identification and implementation of the indicators and measures of the impact on teaching preparation programs in higher education (TPP impact). Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, ([On line])
  • — (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(2).
  • Chalmers, D. & Gardiner, D. (2015). An evaluation framework for identifying the effectiveness and impact of academic teacher development programmes. Stu- dies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 81-91.
  • Clifford, V. A. (1999). The development of autonomous learners in a university setting. Higher Education Research y Development, 18(1), 115-128.
  • Collett, P. & Davidson, M. (1997). Renegotiating autonomy and accountability: The professional growth of developers in a South African institution. The International Journal for Academic Development, 2(2), 28-34.
  • Crosby, E. W. (1962). The origin and early history of sabbatical leave. AAUP Bulletin, 48(3), 253-256.
  • Day, C. (2005). Formar docentes: Cómo, cuándo y en qué condiciones aprende el profesorado. Madril: Narcea Ediciones.
  • Debowski, S. (2011). Emergent shifts in faculty development. To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development, 30, 306-324.
  • Declaration, B. (1999). The European higher education area. Joint Declaration of the European Ministers of Education, 19, 24-69.
  • Diamond, R. M. (2005). The institutional change agency: The expanding role of academic support centers. To Improve the Academy, 23, 24-37.
  • Euler, D. (2015). Mejorar las competencias docentes del profesorado universitario es necesario, ¡pero la innovación sostenible requiere algo más! Educar, 51(1), 149-165.
  • Eurydice. (2007). Focus on the structure of higher education in europe: National trends in the bologna process-2006/07. Brussels, Belgium: Eurydice European Unit.
  • Feixas, M., Fernández, A., Lagos, P., Quesada, C. eta Sabaté, S. (2013). Factores condicionantes de la transferencia de la formación docente en la universidad: un estudio sobre la transferencia de las competencias docentes. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 36(3), 401-416.
  • Feixas, M., Fernández, I., Lagos, P. eta Sabaté, S. (2015). Modelos y tendencias en la investigación sobre efectividad, impacto y transferencia de la formación docente en educación superior. Educar, 51(1), 081-107.
  • Fell, T., Haines, I. & Denicolo, P. (2009). The bologna process and beyond: Implications for postgraduate education. SRHE.
  • Fernández, I. eta Márquez, D. (2014). Formación docente ¿un concepto en crisis? Situación actual y tendencias emergentes en las universidades del estado espa- ñol. In C. Monereo (Ed.), Enseñando a enseñar en la universidad. Sistemas alternativos de formación del profesorado. Parte 3. Prospectiva: El futuro de la formación del profesorado (pp. 251-292). Octaedro.
  • Francis, J. B. (1975). How do we get there from here? Program design for faculty development. The Journal of Higher Education, 46(6), 719-732.
  • Gaff, J. G. (1975). Toward faculty renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gaff, J. G. & Simpson, R. D. (1994). Faculty development in the United States. Innovative Higher Education, 18(3), 167-176.
  • García-Gómez, S. (1999). El desarrollo profesional. análisis de un concepto complejo. Revista de Educación N.º 318. Economía De La Educación, (318), 175- 187.
  • Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4-14.
  • — (2009). Developing students as learners varied phenomena, varied contexts and a developmental trajectory for the whole endeavour. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education ISSN, 31(1), 1-12.
  • — (2004). Mejorar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje universitario mediante estrategias institucionales. Educar, 3(33), 11-30.
  • — (1996). Supporting educational development within departments. The International Journal for Academic Development, 1(1), 27-37.
  • Gibbs, G. & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87-100.
  • Gosling, D. (2001). Educational development units in the UK-what are they doing five years on? International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 74-90.
  • Gosling, D., Sorcinelli, M. D. & Chism, N. (2008). The future of faculty/educational development: An international perspective. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the International Consortium for Educational Development Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Groccia, J. (2010). Why faculty development why now. In A. Saroyan & M. Fre- nay, (Eds.) Building teaching capacities in higher education: A comprehensive international model. (pp. 1-20) Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Hanbury, A., Prosser, M. & Rickinson, M. (2008). The differential impact of UK accredited teaching development programmes on academics’ approaches to teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 469-483.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
  • Hicks, O. (1999). Integration of central and departmental development—reflections from Australian universities. The International Journal for Academic Development, 4(1), 43-51.
  • Hubbard, G. T. & Atkins, S. S. (1995). The professor as a person: The role of faculty well-being in faculty development. Innovative Higher Education, 20(2), 117-128.
  • Imbernón, F. (1994). La formación y el desarrollo profesional del profesorado: hacia una nueva cultura profesional. Bartzelona: Graó.
  • Johnston, S. (1997). Educational development units: Aiming for a balanced approach to supporting teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 16(3), 331-342.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 215-239.
  • Kirkpatrick, D. K. (1994). Evaluating training programs: Four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-koehler.
  • Knapper, C. (2003). Editorial: Three decades of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(1-2), 5-9.
  • Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning y Education, 4(2), 193-212.
  • Kreber, C. (2002). Teaching excellence, teaching expertise, and the scholarship of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 27(1), 5-23.
  • Land, R. (2004). Educational development: Discourse, identity and practice. Uni- ted Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Lewis, K. G. (1996). Faculty development in the United States: A brief history.The International Journal for Academic Development, 1(2), 26-33.
  • Lynn Taylor, K. & Rege Colet, N. (2010). Making the shift from faculty development to educational development. In A. Saroyan & M. Frenay (Eds.) Building Teaching Capacities in Higher Education: A Comprehensive International Model. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus.
  • Madinabeitia, A. eta Fernández, I. (2015). Iraupen luzeko irakasleriaren garapenaren eraginkortasuna: irakasleriaren kontzepzioetan, hurbilketan eta kultura ins- tituzionalean. Tantak, 27(1).
  • Macdonald, R. (2002). Educational development: Research, evaluation and chan- ging practice in higher education. In R.
  • Macdonald & J. Wisdom (Eds.) Academic and Educational Development: Research, Evaluation and Changing Practice in Higher Education (pp. 3-13). London: Kogan Page.
  • Marcelo, C. eta Vaillant, D. (2010). Desarrollo profesional docente: ¿Cómo se aprende a enseñar? Madril: Narcea Ediciones.
  • Margalef García, L. eta Álvarez Méndez, J. M. (2005). La formación del profesorado universitario para la innovación en el marco de la integración del espacio europeo de educación superior. Revista De Educación, (337), 51-70.
  • McLean, M., Cilliers, F. & Van Wyk, J. M. (2008). Faculty development: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Medical Teacher, 30(6), 555-584.
  • Muñoz Martínez, M. eta Garay Garay, F. (2015). La investigación como forma de desarrollo profesional docente: Retos y perspectivas. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 41(2), 389-399.
  • Norton, A., Sonnemann, J. & Cherastidtham, I. (2013). Taking university teaching seriously. Grattan Institute.
  • Ouellett, M. L. (2010). Overview of faculty development. In Kay J. Gillespie & Douglas L. Robertson (Eds.) A Guide to Faculty Development (pp. 3-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Parsons, D., Hill, I., Holland, J. & Willis, D. (2012). Impact of teaching development programmes in higher education. The Higher Education Academy: HEA Research Series.
  • Professional and Organizational Network in Higher Education (POD). (2007). What is faculty development? 2016ko azaroaren 10ean berreskuratua: http:// www.podnetwork.org/development.htm
  • Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. New York: Routledge.
  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.
  • Sheets, K. J. & Schwenk, T. L. (1990). Faculty development for family medicine educators: An agenda for future activities. Teaching and Learning in Medicine: An International Journal, 2(3), 141-148.
  • Smith, M. (2001). Reforming teacher education: Competing agendas. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(4), 263-263.
  • Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L. & Beach, A. L. (2005). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA.
  • Steinert, Y. (2000). Faculty development in the new millennium: Key challenges and future directions. Medical Teacher, 22(1), 44-50.
  • Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Centeno, A., Dolmans, D., Spencer, J., Gelula, M. & Pri- deaux, D. (2006). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide no. 8. Medical Teacher, 28(6), 497-526.
  • Stes, A., Clement, M. & Van Petegem, P. (2007). The effectiveness of a faculty training programme: Long‐term and institutional impact. International Jour- nal for Academic Development, 12(2), 99-109.
  • Taylor, R. & Canfield, P. (2007). Learning to be a scholarly teaching faculty: Cultural change through shared leadership. Transforming a University: The Scho- larship of Teaching and Learning in Practice, 21(3), 233-247.
  • Tigelaar, D. E., Dolmans, D. H., Wolfhagen, I. H. & Van der Vleuten, P.M. (2004). The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education. Higher Education, 48(2), 253-268.
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57-70.
  • Urban, D. & Meister, D. M. (2010). Strategien der professionalisierung in der hochschuldidaktik. Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung.
  • Välimaa, J. & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 265-285.
  • Weimer, M. & Lenze, L. F. (1997). Instructional interventions: A review of the literature on efforts to improve instruction. Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice, 205-240.
  • Wilkerson, L. & Irby, D. M. (1998). Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Academic Medicine, 73(4), 387-396.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.