La gestión de los residuos sólidos urbanosuna revisión de los elementos clave de un problema ambiental y un debate persistente

  1. Itxaro Latasa 1
  2. Pedro J. Lozano 1
  3. Gorka Bueno 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco, España
Revista:
Lurralde: Investigación y espacio

ISSN: 0211-5891

Año de publicación: 2015

Número: 38

Páginas: 213-231

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Lurralde: Investigación y espacio

Resumen

Orain dela hamabi urtetik gora, Gipuzkoa HHSen kudeaketari buruzko eztabaida bat igarotzen ari da. 2002an HHSri buruzko lehenengo arloko plana onartu zenez geroztik, politiko eta hiritar mailan izandako desadostasun eta konfrontazioen ondorioz plan horretan aurreikusitako ekintza ezta azpiegiturarik ez dira abiarazi. Konfliktoaren oinarria planean aurreikusitako hondakinen energiaren berreskuratzeko erraustegian kokatzen da; sektore batzuen ustez irtenbide hoberena dena eta beste batzuen ustetan ez beharrezkoa eta kaltegarria ingurumen eta osasun-publikoaren ikuspegitik. Gipuzkoako arazoa debate orokorrago baten barne kokatzen da, konplejotasun eta inplikazio adigarriarekin non ondakinen kudeaketaren eredu egokiak eztabaidatzen diren. Testuinguru honetan, artikulu honek gaiari buruzko errebisio bibliografikoa aurkezten du helburu hauekin: 1.) zientziatik datozen proposamen eta planteamenduen eta Europar hondakin politikak ezartzen dituen planteamenduen artean dagoen adostasun maila egiaztatzea eta 2.) Hiriko hondakin solidoei buruzko eztabaidaren oinarrizko alderdiaz ikuspegi sintetikoa eta eguneratua izatea. Horretarako hitz-gakoen bitarteko bilaketa bibliografikoa egin dugu ikerketa zientifikoan izen handiko eta gehien erabiltzen diren bi data baseetan (ScienceDirect eta Scopus). Egindako analisiek ikerketa-komunitatean dagoen gaiari buruzko jakin-min gorakorra adierazten dute. Era berean aurkitu ditugu adituak banatzen diren ikuspegi kontrajarriak. Horrek guztiak dagoen eztabaida berbideratzeko beharra azalaratzen du, orain arte gutxitan aintzakotzat hartutako analisirako elementuak gehituz.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • A. Smith et al. (2001) Waste Management Options and Climate Change Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, p. 224.
  • Al-Khatib I.A. et al. (2010) Solid waste characterization, quantification and management practices in developing countries. A case study: Nablus district – Palestine. Journal of Environmental Management, 91:1131–1138.
  • Allegrini E. et al. (2014) Quantification of the resource recovery potential of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ashes. Waste Manage. 34(9),1627-36.
  • Allesch P. and Brunner P. (2014) Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review. Waste Management & Research, 32(6);461–473.
  • Bernad-Beltrán, D. et al. (2012) Actitud ante la recolección selectiva de biorresiduos. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, 28 Sup. (1):37-42.
  • Bernstad A., la Cour Jansen J. (2012) Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems – Current status and potential improvements. Waste Management, 32, 2439–2455.
  • Bulkeley, H., et al. (2005) Governing municipal waste: towards a new analytical framework. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7;1–23.
  • Kinnaman, T.C. (2014) Determining the socially optimal recycling rate. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 85, 5– 10.
  • CE. Comunidad Europea. (2000) Ejemplos de buenas prácticas de compostaje y recogida selectiva de residuos. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas.
  • CE. Comunidad Europea. (2008) Libro Verde sobre la gestión de los biorresiduos en la Unión Europea {SEC(2008) 2936} Disponible en: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0811:FIN:ES:PDF [acceso 18.10.12].
  • CE. Comisión Europea. (1999) Estrategia Territorial Europea: Hacia un desarrollo equilibrado y sostenible del territorio de la Unión Europea. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas.
  • CE. Comisión Europea. (2010) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on future steps in bio-waste management in the European Union. Brussels, 18.5.2010 COM(2010)235 final) Disponible en: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ waste/compost/pdf/sec_biowaste.pdf. [acceso 18.10.12].
  • Chen C.C., Chen Y.T. (2013) Energy recovery or material recovery for MSW treatments. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74;37–44.
  • CMMA. COMISIÓN MUNDIAL DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE Y DEL DESARROLLO (1988). Nuestro Futuro Común. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Cole C. et al. (2014) Towards a Zero Waste Strategy for an English Local Authority Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 89;64–75.
  • Consonni S. et al. (2011) Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems: Project overview and main results. Waste Management, 31;2057–2065.
  • Cossu R, Masi S. (2013) Re-thinking incentives and penalties; Economic aspects of waste management in Italy. Waste Management, 33, 2541–2547.
  • DEFRA (2014) Energy from waste. A guide to the debate. February 2014 (revised edition). Disponible en: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/energy-from-waste-a-guide-tothe-debate [accessed 13.04.14].
  • DFG. Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa. (2002) Aprobación Definitiva del Plan Integral de Gestión de Residuos Urbanos de Gipuzkoa 2002-2016. Boletín Oficial de Gipuzkoa 2002 nº 245 de 27/12/2002; P. 22265-22282
  • DFG. Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa. (2008) NORMA FORAL 7/2008, de 23 de diciembre, por la que se aprueba el documento de progreso (2008-2016) del Plan Integral de Gestión de Residuos Urbanos de Gipuzkoa 2002-2016. Boletín Oficial de Gipuzkoa 2008 nº 250 de 30/12/2008; 38813-38838.
  • Dutta, S. and Arabinda K. D. (2010) Analytical perspective on waste management for environmental remediation. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 29 (7), 636-644.
  • EEA. European Environment Agency. (2011) EEA.DG Environment. Generation/Prevention and (Bio-) Waste Prevention Indicators. Final Report. September 16th, 2011.
  • FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization (2012)The State of Food Insecurity in the World.
  • FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization (2013) Food Wastage Footprint. Impacts on Natural Resources. Rome.
  • Gandy M. (1995) Political conflict over waste-to-energy schemes: The case of incineration in New York. Land Use Policy, 12(1), 29:36.
  • Gebrezgabher, S. a et al. (2010) Economic analysis of anaerobic digestion. A case of Green power biogas plant in The Netherlands. NJAS -Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 57(2), pp.109-115.
  • Grosso M. et al. (2010) Efficiency of energy recovery from waste incineration, in the light of the new Waste Framework Directive. Waste Management, 30; 1238–1243. doi:10.1016/j. wasman.2010.02.036
  • Guerrero L.A. et al. (2013) Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management, 33, 220–232.
  • Holm-Nielsen J.B. et al. (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogás utilization Bioresource Technology, 100, 5478–5484.
  • Huttunen S. et al. (2014) The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogás production. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions,12, 14–30.
  • IPCC (2013) Working Group 1 contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Final draft underlying scientific technical assessment; Disponible en: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/#.Us2BCfYryu4. [acceso 17.03.14]
  • Joos W. et al. (1999) Social aspects of public waste management in Switzerland. Waste Management, 19 (6), 417–425
  • Khoo, H.H. et al. (2010) Food waste conversion options in Singapore: Environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective. Science of the Total Environment 408 (2010) 1367–1373.
  • Koroneos C.J, Nanaki E.A. (2012) Integrated solid waste management and energy production a life cycle. assessment approach: the case study of the city of Thessaloniki. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, 141-150.
  • Lai C.M. et al. (2009) Potentials of food wastes for power generation and energy conservation in Taiwan. Renewable Energy, 34, 1913–1915.
  • Laryea-Goldsmith R. et al. (2011) Gaseous emissions during concurrent combustion of biomass and non-recyclable municipal solid waste. Chemistry Central Journal, 5 (4),1–10.
  • Massarutto, A., et al. (2011) Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems: A life-cycle costing approach. Waste Management, 31(9-10), 2057-65.
  • McCauley D. (2009) Wasting energy? Campaigns against waste-to-energy sites in France. Environmental Politics,18(6), 917–938.
  • Menikpura S.N.M. et al. (2013) Integrated Solid Waste Management: an approach for enhancing climate co-benefits through resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58, 34-42.
  • Merrild H. et al. (2012) Assessing recycling versus incineration of key materials in municipal waste: The importance of efficient energy recovery and transport distances. Waste Management, 32, 1009–1018.
  • Mirabella N. et al. (2014) Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 28-41.
  • Mueller W. (2013) The effectiveness of recycling policy options: Waste diversion or just diversions? Waste Management, 33, 508–518.
  • Papargyropoulou E. et al. (2014) The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 106-115.
  • PE. Parlamento Europeo. Resolución del Parlamento Europeo, de 24 de mayo de 2012, sobre una Europa que utilice eficazmente los recursos (2011/2068(INI) Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 264 E de 13/9/2013, 59-68.
  • Pires A, Martinho G, Chang N.B. (2011) Solid waste management in European countries: A review of systems analysis techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1033- 1050.
  • R. Davies, A.R. (2008) Civil society activism and waste management in Ireland: The Carranstown anti-incineration campaign. Land Use Policy 25, 161–172.
  • Rada E.C, Istrate I.A, Ragazzi M. (2009) Trends in the management of residual municipal solid waste, Environmental Technology, 30(7), 651-661.
  • Saer, A. et al. (2013) Life cycle assessment of a food waste composting system: environmental impact hotspots. Journal of Cleaner Production 52, 234-244.
  • Seadon J.K. (2010) Sustainable waste management systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1639-1651.
  • Singh, R.P. et al. (2011) Management of urban solid waste: Vermicomposting a sustainable option. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55, 719–729.
  • Smith, A. et al. (2001) Waste Management Options and Climate Change Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, p. 224.
  • Trulli E. et al. (2013) Incineration of Pre-Treated Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) for Energy Co-Generation in a Non-Densely Populated Area. Sustainability, 5, 5333-5346.
  • UE. Unión Europea (1994) Directiva 94/62/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 20 de diciembre de 1994, relativa a los envases y residuos de envases. Diario Oficial n° L 365 de 31/12/1994 P. 0010 0023.
  • UE. Unión Europea (2012) DIRECTIVA 2008/98/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 19 de noviembre de 2008 sobre los residuos y por la que se derogan determinadas Directivas (Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE) Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L 312 de 22.11.2008. P 0003-0023.
  • Van de Klundert, A., Anschütz, J. (2001) Integrated sustainable waste management –the concept; tools for decision-makers – experiences from the urban waste expertise programme (1995–2001). WASTE, Gouda, The Netherlands.
  • Vandermeersch T. et al. (2014) Environmental sustainability assessment of food waste valorization options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 87, 57–64.
  • Williams M. (2011) “Waste to Energy Success Factors in Sweden and the US: Analyzing the Transferability of the Swedish Waste-to-Energy Model to the US” December 2011. Disponible en: http://www.acore.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/WTE-in-Sweden-andthe-US-Matt-Williams..pdf [acceso 12.03.14].
  • Wolsink M. (2010) Contested environmental policy infrastructure: Socio-political acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 302–311.
  • Zotos, G. et al. (2009) Developing a holistic strategy for integrated waste management within municipal planning: Challenges, policies, solutions and perspectives for Hellenic municipalities in the zero-waste, low-cost direction. Waste Management, 29, 1686–1692.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet