Pushed Output and Noticing in a Dictoglosstask Implementation in the CLIL Classroom

  1. Basterrechea Lozano, María
  2. García Mayo, María del Pilar
  3. Leeser, Michael John
Revista:
Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

ISSN: 1697-7467

Año de publicación: 2014

Número: 22

Páginas: 7-22

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.30827/DIGIBUG.53643 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

El presente estudio investiga cómo una tarea productiva puede promover la atención a la forma al recibir input tras dicha producción. Dieciséis aprendices adolescentes llevaron a cabo una dictoglosia en varios pasos de forma colaborativa e individual de la siguiente forma: escucharon un texto y anotaron palabras clave, reconstruyeron el texto; volvieron a escuchar el texto y lo compararon con su producción escrita. Los resultados revelaron que (a) la producción y consiguiente input son beneficiosos, dado que los aprendices dirigieron su atención a aspectos formales de la lengua; (b) los alumnos que trabajaron en grupo no obtuvieron mejores resultados

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alegría de la Colina, A. and García Mayo, M.P. (2007). "Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting", in M. P. García Mayo (ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 91-116.
  • Ball, P., Beobide, H. y Muñoa, I. (2004). Cómo enseñar ciencias sociales en inglés. [How to teach Social Sciences in English] In Cap al Plurilingüisme des del'Ensenyament-Aprenentatge de la Segona Llengua - III Jornades Institut Europeu de Programes d'Inmersió. [Towards Multilingualism from Second Language Teaching/Learning - 3rd Symposium of the European Institute of Immersion Programs] Barcelona: IEPI.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Basterrechea, M. and García Mayo, M. P. (2013). "Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners", in K. McDonough & A. Mackey (eds.), Interaction in Diverse Educational Settings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 25-43.
  • Beobide, H. and Ball, P. (2008). Social Sciences. Compulsory Secondary Education. Second cycle. Vol 3: The story goes on Donostia-San Sebastián: Ostadar.
  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Coyle, D. (2007). "Content and language integrated learning: Toward a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies", in The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10: 543-62.
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). "Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?", in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182-204.
  • Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). "Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair and individual work", in Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 1: 40-58.
  • García Mayo, M.P. (2002). "Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: A comparison of form-focused activities", in International Journal of Educational Research 37, 3-4: 323-41. Special issue on "The role of interaction in instructed language learning". Guest Editors: M.P. García Mayo and E. Alcón Soler.
  • Gass, S. (2003). "Input and interaction", in C. Doughty & M. Long (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, 224-55.
  • Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Izumi, S. (2002). "Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization", in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24: 541-77.
  • Izumi, S. and Bigelow, M. (2000). "Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition?", in TESOL Quarterly, 34: 239-78.
  • Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M. and Fearnow, S. (1999). "Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition", in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21: 421-52.
  • Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. (2005). "Noticing and the role of interaction in promoting language learning", in A. Housen & M. Pierrard (eds.), Investigations in Instructed Second Language Learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 353-82.
  • Leeser, M. J. (2008). "Pushed output, noticing, and development of past tense morphology in content-based instruction", in Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 2: 195-220.
  • Lorenzo, F., Casal, S. and Moore, P. (2009). "The effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project", in Applied Linguistics, 31, 3: 418-42.
  • Mackey, A., Gass, S. and McDonough, K. (2000). "How do learners perceive interactional feedback?", in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22: 471-97.
  • Montrul, S. (2005). The Acquisition of Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Nassaji, H. and Tian, J. (2010). "Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs", in Language Teaching Research, 14, 4: 397-419.
  • Nikula, T. (2012). "On the role of peer discussions in the learning of subject-specific language use in CLIL", in E. Alcón Soler & M.P. Safont-Jordà (eds.), Discourse and Language Learning across L2 Instructional Settings. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 133-154.
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). "The role of consciousness in L2 learning", in Applied Linguistics, 11: 129-58.
  • Schmidt, R. (1995). "Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning", in R. Schmidt (ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1-63.
  • Selinker, L. (1972). "Interlanguage", in International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10: 209-31.
  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). "Input enhancement in instructed SLA", in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15: 165-79.
  • Song, M.-J. and Suh, B.-R. (2008). "The effects of output task types on noticing and learning of the English past counterfactual conditional", in System, 36: 295-312.
  • Storch, N. (1999). "Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy", in System, 27: 363-74.
  • Storch, N. (2005). "Collaborative writing: Product, process and students' reflections", in Journal of Second Language Writing, 14: 153-73.
  • Storch, N. (2007). "Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes", in Language Teaching Research, 1, 2: 143-59.
  • Suzuki, W. and Itagaki, N. (2007). "Learner metalinguistic reflections following output-oriented and reflective activities", in Language Awareness, 16, 2: 131-46.
  • Swain, M. (1985). "Communicative Competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensive output in its development", in S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235-53.
  • Swain, M. (1995). "Three functions of output in second language learning", in G. Gook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-44.
  • Swain, M. (1998). "Focus on form through conscious reflection", in C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64-81.
  • Swain, M. (2005). "The output hypothesis: Theory and research", in E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 471-83.
  • Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2001). "Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects", in M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing. New York: Longman, 99-118.
  • Thornbury, S. (1997). "Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote "noticing"", in ELT Journal, 51: 326-35.
  • Uggen, M.S. (2012). "Reinvestigating the noticing function of output", in Language Learning, 62, 2: 505-40.
  • VanPatten, B. (1996). Input Processing and Grammar Instruction. New York: Ablex.
  • VanPatten, B. (2000). "Thirty years of input (or intake, the neglected sibling)", in M. Anderson, C. Klee, F. Morris, E. Tarone & B. Swierzbin (eds.), Social and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition. Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, 287-311.
  • VanPatten, B. and Cadierno, T. (1993). "Explicit instruction and input processing", in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 2: 225-43.
  • Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar Dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet