Double object constructions in L3 Englishan exploratory study of morphological and semantic constraints

Bibliographic References

• Arregi, E. (2003). On Dative Alternations in Basque. Manuscript. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
• Arregi, E. & Ormazabal, J. (2003). Aditz ditrantsitiboen barne-egitura (The internal structure of ditransitive verbs). In J. M. Makazaga & B. Oyharçabal (Eds.), Euskal gramatikari buruzko eta literaturari buruzko ikerketak XXI. mendearen atarian. Gramatika gaiak (Studies on Basque grammar and literature in the XXI century. Grammar topics) (pp. 119-136). Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia.
• Artiagoitia, X. (2000). Hatsarreak eta parametroak lantzen (Working on principles and parameters). Gasteiz: University of the Basque/Country (UPV/EHU) and Arabako Foru Aldundia.
• Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Cuervo, M. C. (2007). Double object in Spanish as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 583-615.
• Demonte, V. (1995). Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus, 7, 5-30.
• Elordieta, A. (2001). Verb Movement and Constituent Permutation in Basque. Utrecht: LOT.
• Fernández, B. (1997). Egiturazko kasuaren erkaketa euskaraz (The comparison of structural case in Basque). Bilbo: University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
• Fernández, B. & Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2010). Datiboa hiztegian (Datives in the dictionary). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
• García Mayo, M. P. & Rothman, J. (2012). L3 morphosyntax in the generative tradition: From the initial state and beyond. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 9-32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Haegeman, L. & Guéron, J. (1999). English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Hawkins, R. (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 29, 20-55.
• Kang, S. (2011). The acquisition of English dative constructions by Korean EFL children. Proceedings of The 16th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics (pp. 62-67). Retrieved from the Internet on 1 April, 2013.
• Kay, P. (2001). Argument Structure Constructions and the Argument-Adjunct Distinction. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
• Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335-391.
• Marantz, A. (1993). Implications for asymmetries in double object construction. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar (pp. 113-151). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
• Mazurkewich, I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91-109.
• Mazurkewich, I. (1985). Syntactic markedness and language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 7, 15-36.
• Mazurkewich, I. & White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition, 16, 261-283.
• Oh, E. (2010). Recovery from first language transfer: The second language acquisition of double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 407-439.
• Oh, E. & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2003). Does morphology affect transfer? The acquisition of English double objects by Korean native speakers. In A. Burgos, L. Micciulla & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 402-413). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
• Oh, E. & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2006a). Against morphological transfer. In K. U. Deen, J. Nomura, B. Schulz & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition: North America (pp. 261-272). Honolulu, HI: University of Connecticut.
• Oh, E. & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2006b). A Case Study of Structural Transfer: The Acquisition of English Double Objects by Adult Korean Speakers. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
• Perpiñan, S. & Montrul, S. (2006). On binding asymmetries in dative alternation construction in L2 Spanish. In C. A. Klee & T. L. Face (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 135-148). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
• Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1994). Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In: T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 317-368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72.
• Slabakova, R. & Montrul, S. (2002). On viewpoint aspect and its L2 acquisition: A UG perspective. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.) Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 363-395). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
• Syndicate, U.C.L.E. (2001) Quick Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Whong-Barr, M. and Schwartz, B. D. (2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 579- 616.