Strategy approach for eLearning 2.0 deployment in Universities

  1. Casquero Oyarzabal, Oskar
  2. Portillo Berasaluce, Javier
  3. Ovelar Beltran, Ramón
  4. Romo Uriarte, Jesús María
  5. Benito Gómez, Manuel
Revista:
Digital Education Review

ISSN: 2013-9144

Año de publicación: 2010

Número: 18

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Digital Education Review

Resumen

The institutionally powered Personal Learning Environment (iPLE) constitutes our vision of how Web 2.0 technologies, people arrangement and data sharing could be applied for delivering open, flexible, distributed and learner-centred learning environments to university members. Based on the iPLE, this paper explores a strategy approach that universities could follow in order to deploy eLearning 2.0 tools and services. With that aim in mind, we review the patterns that Web 2.0 has successfully applied, and have been proved to encourage people to interact and to share information. Then, we present an eLearning 2.0 provisioning strategy based on iPLEs. Finally, we explain how this strategy can help translating Web 2.0 patterns to learning, and positioning universities as eLearning 2.0 providers.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ajjan, H. & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80
  • Bart, M. (2008). Technology Trends in Higher Education: How Web 2.0 Tools are ransforming Learning. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from http://www. facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-and-learning/technologytrends-In-Higher- education-how-web-20-tools-are-transforming-learning/
  • Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Benito, M., & Romo, J. (2010). iPLE Network: an integrated eLearning 2.0 strategy from University's perspective. [Electronic version]. Interactive Learning Environments 18(3), 293-308.
  • Conole, G. (2008). New Schemas for Mapping Pedagogies and Technologies. Ariadne, 56. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue56/conole/
  • Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine, October 17. Retrieved from: http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?article1/429-1&section1/ 4articles
  • Downes, S. (2010). Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge. In H. Yang & S. Yuen (Eds.), Collective Intelligence and E-Learning 2.0: Implications of Web-Based Communities and Networking, (pp. 1-26). Hershey PA: IGI Global
  • Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners dropout. Workforce, 10, 53-63.
  • Garrett, R, & Jokivirta, L. (2004). Online Learning in Commonwealth Universities: Selected Data from the 2004 Observatory Survey, Part 1. London: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education
  • Siemens, G. (2003). Learning communities and learning networks. In elearnspace. everything learning. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/ blog/2003/09/30/learning-communities-and-learningnetworks
  • Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. In elearnspace. everything learning. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/KnowingKnowledge-LowRes.pdf
  • Weller, M. (2009). Using learning environments as a metaphor for educational change. On the Horizon, 17(3), 181-189
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet