Hardware‐in‐the‐loop performance analysis of a railway traction system under sensor faults

  1. Garramiola, Fernando 2
  2. Poza, Javier 2
  3. Olmo, Jon del 2
  4. Nieva, Txomin 1
  1. 1 CAF Power & AutomationSpain
  2. 2 Electronics and Computer Science DepartmentFaculty of EngineeringMondragon UnibertsitateaSpain
Revista:
The Journal of Engineering

ISSN: 2051-3305,  2051-3305

Any de publicació: 2019

Volum: 2019

Número: 17

Pàgines: 3797-3801

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.1049/JOE.2018.8249 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: The Journal of Engineering

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

Fault mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has been used during decades for analysing the effects of faults in different applications. Initially, FMEA based on risk priority numbers provided information about the effects in the system, but during the last years different approaches have been developed to obtain a more robust risk evaluation. The proposed enhanced FMEA can provide the quantitative effects of sensor faults in a railway traction drive, in variables such as torque, current and voltages. In addition to the previous work, quantitative effects on overall performance indicators, such as energy efficiency and comfort, are obtained too. Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL)-based fault injection approach has been used to generate fault scenarios. The test platform is composed of a real-time simulator and a commercial traction control unit for a railway application.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Kara‐ZaitriC. KellerA.Z. BarodyI.et al.: ‘An improved FMEA methodology’.1991 Proc. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symp. Orlando USA 1991 pp.248–252
  • Arabian‐Hoseynabadi H., (2010), Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 32, pp. 817, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.019
  • Colli A., (2015), Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 50, pp. 804, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.056
  • Liu H.‐C., (2013), Expert Syst. Appl., 40, pp. 828, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
  • Braaksma A.J.J., (2012), Int. J. Prod. Res., 50, pp. 6904, 10.1080/00207543.2011.632386
  • delOlmoJ. PozaJ. GarramiolaF.et al.: ‘Model driven hardware‐in‐the‐loop fault analysis of railway traction systems’.2017 IEEE Int. Workshop of Electronics Control Measurement Signals and their Application to Mechatronics (ECMSM) Donostia‐San Sebastian Spain 2017 pp.1–6
  • Yang C., (2017), IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., pp. 1
  • Sarhadi P., (2015), Int. J. Dyn. Control, 3, pp. 470, 10.1007/s40435-014-0108-3
  • Isermann R., (2006), Fault‐diagnosis systems, 10.1007/3-540-30368-5
  • delOlmoJ.: ‘Diagnóstico activo de unidades de tracción ferroviaria ante fallos en sensores’ Mondragon Unibertsitatea 2017
  • AguirreM. CallejaC. Lopez‐de‐HerediaA.et al.: ‘FOC and DTC comparison in PMSM for railway traction application’.Proc. of the 2011 14th European Conf. on Power Electronics and Applications Birmingham UK 2011 pp.1–10
  • AguirreM. PozaJ. AldasoroL.et al.: ‘Sensorless torque control of PMSMs for railway traction applications’.2013 15th European Conf. on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE) Lille France 2013 pp.1–10
  • Kwansup LeeK.L. Jaechan LeeJ.L. Ilhwan KimI.K.: ‘A study on strategy of condition based maintenance for Korea metro rolling stocks’.7th IET Conf. on Railway Condition Monitoring (RCM 2016) Birmingham UK 2016 pp.5 (4.)–5 (4.)
  • Marzat J., (2012), Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G J. Aerosp. Eng., 226, pp. 1329, 10.1177/0954410011421717
  • Chung D.‐W., (1998), IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 34, pp. 340, 10.1109/28.663477
  • ISO 2631‐1(1997), (1997), Mechanical vibration and shock evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration, part 1 general requirements
  • ‘EN 13452‐1:2003 railway applications – braking‐mass transit brake systems – part 1: performance requirements’ 2003