Organismos, relaciones de vida y evolucióninter-dependencias a partir del Apoyo mutuo de Kropotkin

  1. Etxeberria Agiriano, Arantza 1
  2. Cortés García, David 1
  3. Torres Aldave, Mikel 2
  1. 1 Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad del País Vasco, UPV/EHU; IAS Research Group for Life, Mind and Society, Universidad del País Vasco, UPV/EHU
  2. 2 Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad del País Vasco, UPV/EHU
Revue:
Artefactos

ISSN: 1989-3612

Année de publication: 2023

Titre de la publication: Philosophy of Organismal Biology: From Ontogeny to Ecology and Evolution

Volumen: 12

Número: 1

Pages: 179-204

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14201/ART2023121179204 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Artefactos

Résumé

We examine some implications of Kropotkin’s seminal work on mutual aid as a factor of evolution to analyze how non-competitive life relations are understood in current biological theories. We distinguish two research lines deriving from his work: one of them studies intraspecific relations of altruism and selfishness, and the other one is focused on interspecific symbiotic relations. Furthermore, we use the example of pregnancy and viviparity to extend the analysis to the evolution of novel interorganismic characters. We conclude with a conceptual review of how collaborations and inter-dependencies among organisms shape individual autonomy and sociability in organismal evolutionary biology.

Références bibliographiques

  • Azurmendi, J. (2016). Gizabere kooperatiboaz. Donostia: Jakin Argitaletxea.
  • Baedke, J., Fábregas-Tejeda, A. (2023). The Organism in Evolutionary Explanation: From Early 20th Century to the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. En Dickins, Tom E y Dickins, Benjamin J. A (eds.), Evolutionary Biology: Contemporary and Historical Reflections Upon Core Theory (pp. 117-146). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22028-9_8
  • Baedke, J., Fábregas-Tejeda, A., Nieves Delgado, A. (2020). The holobiont concept before Margulis. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 334(3), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22931
  • Bich, L., Mossio, M., Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Moreno, A. (2016). Biological regulation: Controlling the system from within. Biology & Philosophy, 31(2), 237-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9497-8
  • Borrello, M. E. (2004) “Mutual Aid” and “Animal Dispersion”: An historical analysis of alternatives to Darwin. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 47(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2004.0003
  • Canciani, M., Arnellos, A., Moreno, A. (2019). Revising the Superorganism: An Organizational Approach to Complex Eusociality. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02653
  • Carrapiço, F. (2015). Can We Understand Evolution Without Symbiogenesis? En Nathalie Gontier (ed.), Reticulate Evolution: Symbiogenesis, Lateral Gene Transfer, Hybridization and Infectious Heredity (pp. 81-105). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16345-1_3
  • Cortés-García, D., Etxeberria, A. (2023). Ontologies in evolutionary biology: the role of the organism in the two Syntheses. En José Manuel Viejo y Mariano Sanjuán (eds.), Life and Mind – New directions in the Philosophy of Biology and Cognitive Sciences. Springer. Forthcoming.
  • Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
  • Darwin, C. R. (1877). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (Second Edition, Revised and Augmented). London: John Murray.
  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dugatkin, L. A. (2006). The Altruism Equation. Seven Scientists Search for the Origins of Goodness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Dupré, J., O’Malley, M. A. (2009). Varieties of Living Things: Life at the Intersection of Lineage and Metabolism. Philosophy and Theory in Biology, 1(20170609). https://doi.org/10.3998/ptb.6959004.0001.003
  • Durant, J. R. (1979) Scientific Naturalism and Social Reform in the Thought of Alfred Russel Wallace. The British Journal for the History of Science, 12(1), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400016812
  • Erkenbrack, E. M., Maziarz, J. D., Griffith, O. W., Liang, C., Chavan, A. R., Nnamani, M. C., Wagner, G. P. (2018). The mammalian decidual cell evolved from a cellular stress response. PLOS Biology, 16(8), e2005594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005594
  • Etxeberria, A., Pérez Iglesias J. I. (2020). Gizaberea, Eboluzioa eta Kooperazioa. Jakin aldizkaria, 237-238, 161-178
  • Etxeberria, A., Umerez, J. (2006). Organismo y Organización En la Biología Teórica ¿Vuelta Al Organicismo? Ludus Vitalis, 14(26), 3-38.
  • Gayon, J. (1998). Darwinism’s struggle for survival: heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gilbert, S. F. (2022). Pseudo-embryology and Personhood: How embryological pseudoscience helps structure the American abortion debate. Authorea. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.166597742.26436901/v1
  • Goodnight, C. J. (2015) Multilevel selection theory and evidence: a critique of Gardner, 2015. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28(9), 1734-1746. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12685
  • Gould, S. J. (1988). Kropotkin was no crackpot. Natural History, 97(7), 12-21.
  • Haig, D. (1993). Genetic Conflicts in Human Pregnancy. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 68(4), 495-532. https://doi.org/10.1086/418300
  • Haig, D. (1996). Altercation of Generations: Genetic Conflicts of Pregnancy. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 35(3), 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00035.x
  • Huitzil, S., Sandoval-Motta, S., Frank, A., Aldana, M. (2018). Modeling the Role of the Microbiome in Evolution. Frontiers in Physiology,9, 1836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01836
  • Huxley, T. H. (1888). The Struggle for Existence in Human Society. En Evolution & Ethics and Other Essays (pp. 195-236). Huxley’s Collected Essays. https://mathcs.clarku.edu/huxley/CE9/str.html
  • Jaeger, J. (2021). The Fourth Perspective: Evolution and Organismal Agency. [Preprint en OSFPREPRINT]. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2g7fh
  • Johnson, E. M. (2019). The struggle for coexistence: Peter Kropotkin and the social ecology of science in Russia, Europe, and England, 1859-1922 (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).
  • Kingma, E. (2018). Lady Parts: The Metaphysics of Pregnancy. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 82, 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246118000115
  • Kingma, E. (2019). Were You a Part of Your Mother? Mind, 128(511), 609-646. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzy087
  • Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual Aid: A Factor in Evolution (2018). Middletown: Jonathan-David Jackson.
  • Kropotkin, P. (1922). Ethics: Origin and Development (2009). The Anarchist Library.
  • Lazcano, A., Peretó, J. (2021). Prokaryotic symbiotic consortia and the origin of nucleated cells: A critical review of Lynn Margulis hypothesis. Biosystems, 204(2021), 104408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104408
  • Lennox, J. G., Wilson, B. E. (1994) Natural selection and the struggle for existence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,25(1). 65-80.
  • Lewens, T. (2015). The Meaning of Science: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lloyd, E. A., Wade, M. J. (2019). Criteria for Holobionts from Community Genetics. Biological Theory,14(3), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00322-w
  • Male, V. (2021). Medawar and the immunological paradox of pregnancy: In context. Oxford Open Immunology, 2(1), iqaa006. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfimm/iqaa006
  • Malthus, T. R. (1993). Primer ensayo sobre la población (P. de Azcárate Diz y J. Vergara Doncel, Trans.). Madrid: Alianza. (original work published 1793).
  • Margulis, L. (1997) Words as Battle Cries— Symbiogenesis and the New Field of Endocytobiology. En Lynn Margulis y Dorion Sagan (eds.), Slanted Truths: Essays on Gaia, Symbiosis and Evolution (pp. 295-305). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Millstein, R. L. (2014). Probability in biology: the case of fitness. En Alan Háyek y Christopher Hitchcock (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy (pp. 601-622). Oxford: Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199607617.013.27
  • Moreno, A., Etxeberria, A., Umerez, J. (2008). The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models. Biosystems, 91(2), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2007.05.009
  • Moreno, A., Mossio, M. (2015). Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Nicholson, D. (2014). The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12128
  • Nuño de la Rosa, L., Pavličev, M., Etxeberria, A. (2021). Pregnant Females as Historical Individuals: An Insight From the Philosophy of Evo-Devo. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572106
  • Okasha, S. (2002). Darwinian metaphysics: Species and the question of essentialism. Synthese, 131, 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015731831011
  • Okasha, S. (2020). Biological Altruism. En The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/altruism-biological/
  • Oldroyd, D. R. (1986). Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution: A review of our present understanding. Biology and Philosophy, 1(2), 133-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142899
  • Pence, C. H. (2022). Charles Darwin (1809-1882). En Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fieser, J. y Dowden, B., (eds.). https://iep.utm.edu/
  • Rosslenbroich, B. (2014). On the Origin of Autonomy: A New Look at the Major Transitions in Evolution. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04141-4
  • Roughgarden, J. (2020). Holobiont Evolution: Mathematical Model with Vertical vs. Horizontal Microbiome Transmission. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0012.002
  • Sagan, L. (1967). On the origin of mitosing cells. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 14(3), 225-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(67)90079-3
  • Sapp, J. (1994). Evolution by association: A history of symbiosis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Schjenken, J. E., Tolosa, J. M., Paul, J. W., Clifton, V. L., Smith, R. (2012). Mechanisms of Maternal Immune Tolerance During Pregnancy. En Jing Zheng (ed.), Recent Advances in Research on the Human Placenta (pp. 211-242). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/33541
  • Singer, P. (2011). The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Sober, E., Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others. The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Stadtmauer, D. J., Wagner, G. P. (2020). Cooperative inflammation: The recruitment of inflammatory signaling in marsupial and eutherian pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 137, 102626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2019.102626
  • Suárez, J. (2018). The importance of symbiosis in philosophy of biology: An analysis of the current debate on biological individuality and its historical roots. Symbiosis, 76(2), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-018-0556-1
  • Suárez, J., Triviño V. (2020). What Is a Hologenomic Adaptation? Emergent Individuality and Inter-Identity in Multispecies Systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(187). https://doi.org/0.3389/fpsyg.2020.00187
  • Sultan, S., Moczek, A., Walsh, D. (2021). Bridging the explanatory gaps: What can we learn from a biological agency perspective? 44(1), e2100185. BioEssays : News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100185
  • Swain, D., Urban, P., Malabou, C., Kouba, P. (2021). Unchaining Solidarity: On Mutual Aid and Anarchism with Catherine Malabou. Lanham/Boulder/New York/London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Todes, D. P. (1987). Darwin’s Malthusian metaphor and Russian evolutionary thought, 1859-1917. Isis; an International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences,78(294), 537-551. https://doi.org/10.1086/354551
  • Todes, D. P. (1989). Darwin without Malthus: The Struggle for Existence in Russian Evolutionary Thought. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Toepfer, G. (2011). Symbiose. En Georg Toepfer (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Biologie: Geschichte und Theorie der biologischen Grundbegriffe. Band 3: Parasitismus—Zweckmäßigkeit (pp. 426-442). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00461-1_23
  • Tomasello, M. (2016). A Natural History of Human Morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
  • Wade, M. J. (2016). Adaptation in Metapopulations: How Interaction Changes Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wade M. J., Goodnight C. (1998) Perspective: The Theories of Fisher and Wright in the Context of Metapopulations: When Nature Does Many Small Experiments. Evolution, 52(6), 1537-1553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02235.x
  • Wagner, G. P., Kin, K., Muglia, L., Pavličev, M. (2014). Evolution of mammalian pregnancy and the origin of the decidual stromal cell. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 58(2-4), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.130335gw
  • Walsh, D. M. (2015). Organisms, Agency, and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316402719.
  • Wolf, J. B., Hager, R. (2006). A Maternal-Offspring Coadaptation Theory for the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting. PLOS Biology, 4(12), e380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040380
  • Wolf, J. B., Hager, R. (2009). Selective abortion and the evolution of genomic imprinting. Journal of Evolutionary Biology,22(12), 2519-2523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01874.x
La source de données: Dialnet