¿La competencia digital docente favorece la inclusión educativa?

  1. Kerexeta Brazal, Itziar 1
  2. Darretxe Urrutxi , Leire 1
  1. 1 Universidad del Pais Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Revista:
Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

ISSN: 2529-9638

Any de publicació: 2023

Número: 14

Pàgines: 45-58

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.6018/RIITE.548411 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

Research has shown that both educational inclusion and digital competence are priorities in education today. However, not all studies link these two issues. Therefore, this article, which is part of a broader research, aims to analyse the meaning of educational inclusion and teachers' digital competences in the case of conectandoescuelas.org in order to identify aspects that facilitate better quality in education. We conducted a qualitative study through 6 focus groups meetings in the Basque Country and Latin America with K-12 teachers. The data were transcribed and analysed using the semantic analysis software NVIVO 1.2 Release. It was found that society is becoming increasingly technological and this has an impact on schools. While it is not easy to define what it means to be digitally competent and educationally inclusive, teachers face barriers in implementing ICT in their daily lives. Although they have facilitating applications in the teaching-learning process, more training is still needed to respond to current challenges. The conclusions indicate that technology and digital competences for teachers can support educational inclusion, although at present they are still theoretical and idealised constructs that require more contextualised training to respond to the great challenge facing schools today.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Álvarez-Rementería, M., Darretxe, L. & Arandia, M. (2021). La formación continua del profesorado desde una perspectiva de género: Análisis del plan formativo de País Vasco. Estilos de Aprendizaje 14(2), 62-74 https://xurl.es/i21ou
  • Bacigalupo, M. (2022). Competence frameworks as orienteering tools. RiiTE Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 12, 20-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/riite.523261
  • Barbour, R. (2018). Doing focus groups. Sage.
  • Bautista, Y. & Zúñiga, M. (2021). La práctica docente mediada por las tecnologías de la información y comunicación. Retos y experiencias en educación básica. Conrado, 17(79), 81-88.
  • Bourne, J. & Winstone, N. (2021). Empowering students’ voices: the use of activity-oriented focus groups in higher education research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 44(4), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1777964
  • Cabero-Almenara, J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J. & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2021). Teachers’ digital competence to assist students with functional diversity: Identification of factors through logistic regression methods. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13151
  • Cranmer, S. (2020). Disabled children’s evolving digital use practices to support formal learning. A missed opportunity for inclusion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12827
  • Castro Rodríguez, M. M., Suelves, D. M. & Fernández, H. S. (2019). Digital competence and inclusive education. Visions of teachers, students and families. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 19(61). https://doi.org/10.6018/RED/61/06
  • Comet Weiler, C. & Jiménez Chaves, V. E. (2016). Los estudios de casos como enfoque metodológico. Academo, 3(2). https://bit.ly/3VvoZwm
  • Coller, X. (2005). Estudio de casos. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Darretxe, L., Gezuraga, M. & Berasategi Sancho, N. (2020). La necesidad de avanzar hacia la investigación inclusiva. Márgenes: Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Málaga, 1(1), 104-114. https://tuit.es/yaozf
  • Echeita, G. & Ainscow, M. (2011). La educación inclusiva como derecho. Marco de referencia y pautas de acción para el desarrollo de una revolución pendiente. Tejuelo: Revista de Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura, 12, 26-46 https://bit.ly/3LWpeOa
  • Erickson, F. (2012). Qualitative research methods for science education. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1451-1469). Springer.
  • European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education (2022). Celebrating 25 years on the path to inclusive education. https://bit.ly/410VYdb%20
  • Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Cabero, J. & López, E. (2018). Knowledge and degree of training of primary education teachers in relation to ICT taught to students with disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1961-1978 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12675
  • Freixas, R., Domínguez-Figaredo, D. & Gamboa-Rodríguez, F. (2022). The Digital Paradox: Analysis of Differences in Teacher Implementing Technology Inside and Outside the Classroom. Revista Electrónica Educare, 26(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-2.12
  • Jiménez Hernández, D., Muñoz Sánchez, P. & Sánchez Giménez, F. S. (2021). La Competencia Digital Docente, una revisión sistemática de los modelos más utilizados. RiiTE Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, (10), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.472351
  • Kerexeta, I., Monje, P. M. & Darretxe, L. (2022). Teachers’ digital competence and inclusive education at school: An analysis of teacher attitudes. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(9), 3314–3326. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i9.7031
  • Meijer, C. J. W. (2010). Inclusive Education: Facts and Trends. In International Conference-Inclusive Education: A way in promote social cohesion. https://tuit.es/K3yZB
  • Morales, N. (2017). Las TIC y los escolares del medio rural, entre la brecha digital y la educación inclusiva. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 69(3), 41-56. https://tuit.es/ltAHP
  • Muñoz, M. L., López, M. & Assaél, J. (2015). Concepciones docentes para responder a la diversidad: ¿Barreras o recursos para la inclusión educativa? Psicoperspectivas, 14(3), 68-79. https://tuit.es/zdvfn
  • Prendes-Espinosa, M.P. (2022). Formar para el emprendimiento digital: construyendo los ciudadanos del siglo XXI. RiiTE Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 12, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.525101
  • Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. In Joint Research Centre (JRC) Science for Policy report. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
  • Rivero Guerra, A. O., Botella Nicolás, A. M. & Gonzálvez Vallés, J. E. (2022). Investigaciones emergentes de nuevo cuño. En ARANZADI.
  • Saladino, M., Marin Suelves, D. & San Martín Alonso, Á. (2020). Percepción docente del aprendizaje mediado tecnológicamente en aulas italianas. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 34(3), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v34i3.80593
  • Sim, J., & Waterfield, J. (2019). Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges. Quality and Quantity, 53(6), 3003–3022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00914-5
  • Stenman, S. & Pettersson, F. (2020). Remote teaching for equal and inclusive education in rural areas? An analysis of teachers’ perspectives on remote teaching. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 87–98. https://tuit.es/v9ybq
  • Stake, R. (2013). Estudios de casos cualitativos. N. Denzin e Y. Lincoln (coords.), Las estrategias de investigación cualitativa (154-197). En Gedisa.
  • Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P. N. & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups and the research toolbox. En Focus groups, 37-51.
  • Stewart, D. (2021). Performing goodness in qualitative research methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35 (2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1962560
  • Trujillo, F. (2021). The school year 2020-2021 in Spain during the pandemic. Joint Research Centre https://tuit.es/4yH3T
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet