Euskararen erabilera Eusko Legebiltzarreko debateetan (2012-2020)

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abercrombie, Gavin; Batista-Navarro, Riza (2018). ‘Aye’ or ‘No’. Speech-level Sentiment Analysis of Hansard Parliamentary Debate Transcripts. Accesible at: https://aclanthology.org/L18-1659.pdf
• Agerri, R. & Rigau, G. (2020). “Projecting heterogeneous annotations for named entity recognition”. In Proceedings of the Iberian Languages Evaluation Forum (IberLEF 2020). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2664/capitel_paper2.pdf
• Agerri, R.; San Vicente, I.; Campos, J. A.; Barrena, A.; Saralegi, X.; Etxabe, Soroa, A. & Agirre, E. (2020). “Give your text representation models some love: the case for basque”. In Proceedings of LREC. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.00033
• Alcaide, E., Carranza, A., eta Fuentes-Rodríguez, C. (2016). Emotional argumentation in Political Discourse. In Fuentes-Rodríguez, C. eta Álvarez, G. (koord.), A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse. The Andalusian Parliament, 129-160.
• Bara, J., Weale, A. and Bicquelet, A. (2007), Analysing Parliamentary Debate with Computer Assistance. Swiss Political Science Review, 13: 577-605. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00090.x
• Berria (2013ko abuztuak 6). “Euskararen erabilera Eusko Legebiltzarreko ekaineko osoko bilkuretan”. https://www.berria.eus/paperekoa/1701/003/002/2013-08-06/euskararen-erabilera-eusko-legebiltzarreko-ekaineko-osoko-bilkuretan.htm
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Burfoot, C., Bird, S., and Baldwin, T. (2011). Collective classification of congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, pages 1506–1515. Association for Computational Linguistics.
• Duthie, R., Budzynska, K., and Reed, C. (2016). Mining ethos in political debate. In COMMA, pages 299–310.
• Dunmire, P. Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Language and Linguistics, 6(11), pp. 735-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365
• Escribano, Nayla; González, Jon Ander; Orbegozo-Terradillos, Julen; Larrondo-Ureta, Ainara; Peña-Fernández, Simón; Perez-de-Viñaspre, Olatz; Agerri, Rodrigo (2022). “BasqueParl: A Bilingual Corpus of Basque Parliamentary Transcriptions”. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2022), Marseille, 20-25 June 2022, pp. 3382–3390. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2022/pdf/2022.lrec-1.361.pdf
• Europako Kontseilua (2022). Education and Languages, Language Policy. Estrasburgo: Europako Kontseilua. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/division_EN.asp
• Eusko Jaurlaritza (2016). VI. Inkesta soziolinguistikoa. Gasteiz: Eusko Jaurlaritza.
• Griffith, J. eta Leston-Bandeira, C. (2012). How Are Parliaments Using New Media to Engage with Citizens?, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 18:3-4, 496-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.706058
• Grijzenhout, Steven; Marx, Maarten; Jijkoun, Valentin (2014). “Sentiment Analysis in Parliamentary Proceedings”. In From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines. Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55], pp. 117–134
• Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis F. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Hajlaoui, N., Kolovratnik, D., Väyrynen, J., Steinberger, R., and Varga, D. (2014). DCEP -digital corpus of the European parliament. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), Reykjavik, Iceland, May. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
• Imseng, D.; Bourlard, H.; Caesar, H.; Garner, Philip N.; Lecorvé, A.; Nanchen, A. (2012). Mediaparl. Bilingual Mixed Language Accented Speech Database. IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2012, pp. 263-268, doi: 10.1109/SLT.2012.6424233.
• Iñigo-Mora, Isabel (2007). Estrategias del discurso parlamentario. La Cámara de los Comunes y El Congreso de los Diputados. Discurso & Sociedad, 1(3): 400-438.
• Koehn, P. (2005). Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit X: Papers, pages 79–86, Phuket, Thailand, September 13-15.
• Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R. eta Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media, The Sociological Quarterly, 59:1, 62-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
• Masumboka, E.L. (2017). Critique of Multilingualism in South Africa’s Post-Democratic Parliament with particular reference to the use of Selected Minority Languages. Grahamstown: Rhodes University.
• Marx, M. and Schuth, A. (2010). DutchParl. The parliamentary documents in Dutch. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Lan-Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), Valletta, Malta, May. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
• McLeod, W. (1998). “Scotland's Languages in Scotland's Parliament”. Scottish Affairs, 24(1), 68-82.
• Murphy, Julian R. (2020). “Indigenous Languages in Parliament and Legislation: Comparing the Māori and Indigenous Australian Experience”. Māori Law Review, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3712771.
• Nayla Escribano, Jon Ander González, Julen Orbegozo-Terradillos, Ainara Larrondo-Ureta, Simón Peña-Fernández, Olatz Perez-de-Viñaspre and Rodrigo Agerri (2022). BasqueParl: A Bilingual Corpus of Basque Parliamentary Transcriptions. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2022), pages 3382–339. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2022/pdf/2022.lrec-1.361.pdf
• Onyimadu, O., Nakata, K., Wilson, T., Macken, D., and Liu, K. (2013). Towards sentiment analysis on parliamentary debates in Hansard. In Joint International Se- mantic Technology Conference, pages 48–50. Springer
• Rheault L., Beelen K., Cochrane C., Hirst G. (2016) Measuring Emotion in Parliamentary Debates with Automated Textual Analysis. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0168843. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168843.
• Richards, Barry (2010). The Emotional Deficit in Political Communication. Political Communication, 21(3), 339-352.
• Roukos, S., Graff, D., and Melamed, D. (1995). Hansard French/English LDC95T20.
• Salah, Zahen Ibrahim (2014). Machine Learning and Sentiment Analysis Approaches for the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates [PhD. Thesis]. University of Liverpool.
• Sokolovska, Zorana. 2016. “Imagining Europe's linguistic diversity in the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly”. Language & Communication, 51, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.004
• Soziolinguistika Klusterra (2016). Hizkuntzen erabileraren kale neurketa. Andoain: Soziolinguistika Klusterra.
• Thomas, M., Pang, B., and Lee, L. (2006). Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 327–335. Association for Computational Linguistics.
• Van Dijk, Teun A. (2001). Texto y contexto de los debates parlamentarios, Tonos Digital: Revista Electrónica de Estudios Filológicos, 2, 1-47.
• Wilson, J., & Stapleton, K. (2003). Nation-State, devolution and the parliamentary discourse of minority languages. In Journal of Language and Politics (2. bol., 1 zenbakia, 5-30. orr.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.1.03wil
• Wright, Sue (2007). “English in the European Parliament: MEPs and their Language Repertoires”. Sociolinguistica, 21(1), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484605060.151