Promoting gendered structural change in leadership in higher educationThe interaction between formal and informal rules

  1. Vilhena, Fernanda Campanini
  2. Pérez, Jon Pizarro 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

Revista:
Investigaciones feministas

ISSN: 2171-6080

Any de publicació: 2021

Títol de l'exemplar: Igualdad de Género en instituciones de educación superior e investigación

Volum: 12

Número: 2

Pàgines: 319-330

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.5209/INFE.72334 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Investigaciones feministas

Resum

Introduction and objectives. In the higher education and research sector, efforts have been employed in diverse countries to bring about gendered structural change, and most strategies pursue such a goal through the implementation of formal changes in its structures and policies. Leaning on the feminist institutionalism theory, the aim of this article is to discuss the importance of understanding how the formal and the informal institutional norms interact between each other in initiatives seeking gender equality in leadership and decision-making in the specific context of higher education institutions. Methodology. A qualitative approach has been followed. Interviews with members of the Board of Directors of a higher education and research institution in northern Spain have been conducted and analysed, aiming at identifying the barriers to the access of women to leadership positions and possible measures to overcome them. Results. The analysis confirmed the impact caused by the gendered dynamics present at both individual and institutional levels to GE initiatives. While the importance of formal institutional commitments to gender equality has been recognised, the analysis recalls the attention to the fact that informal settings shape the applicability of formal policies, with continuous references to the traditionally unequal distribution of power and attribution of value to women and men. Discussion and added value. Although much theoretical knowledge has been produced in the field of gender and institutions, especially concerning the gendered bases of institutions, the field still lacks within-process studies on the aspects influencing the obtained outcomes of developed initiatives pursuing gender equality in institutional leadership. The study developed in this paper allows for replication in different contexts, hence contributing to the refinement of the existing knowledge on the dynamics of change in gender-oriented initiatives

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Beckwith, Karen (2005). A Common Language of Gender? Politics & Gender, 1(1), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X05001017
  • Brown, Leslie & Potts, Karen (2005). Becoming an anti-oppressive researcher. In: Leslie Brown and Susan Strega (eds.): Research and Resistance: Critical, Indigenous, & Anti-Oppressive Approaches (pp. 255-283) Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
  • Castaño, Cecilia; Vázquez-Cupeiro, Susana; Martínez-Cantos, José Luis (2017). Gendered management in Spanish universities: functional segregation among vice-rectors. Gender and Education, 31(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1410109
  • Clavero, Sara & Galligan, Yvonne (2021). Delivering gender justice in academia through gender equality plans? Normative and practical challenges. Gender, Work and Organization, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12658
  • Chappell, Louise (2006). Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered “Logic of Appropriateness”. Politics & Gender, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06221044
  • Chappell, Louise & Waylen, Georgina (2013). Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions. Public Administration, 91(3), 599-615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02104.x
  • Eagly, Alice & Johnson Blair (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233
  • Eagly, Alice & Carli, Linda. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. USA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Erikson, Josefina (2019). Institutions, Gendered Perceptions, and Frames of Meaning: Explaining Strategic Choices of Women MEPs in Swedish Prostitution Policy. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2019.1536599
  • European Commission. ‘Gender Equality Strategy: Striving for a Union of Equality’, March 2020a. https://bit.ly/3fJWBSX
  • European Commission. Horizon 2020 Online Manual, Gender Equality (2020a) https://bit.ly/2Sn6IVO
  • European Commission. Horizon 2020, Science with and for Society (2020b). https://bit.ly/3ucdTND
  • European Commission (2019). ‘She Figures 2018’. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/936
  • European Institute for Gender Equality. ‘Gender Equality in Academia and Research – GEAR tool. https://bit.ly/34fyi9S
  • European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), Gender Equality Index 2019. https://bit.ly/3yBEYgu
  • Ezzedeen, Souha R., Budworth, Marie-Hélène & Baker, Susan D. (2015). The glass ceiling and executive careers: Still an issue for pre-career women. Journal of Career Development, 42(5), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845314566943
  • Fritz, Claudia, & Van Knippenberg, Daan. (2017). Gender and leadership aspiration: the impact of organizational identification. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12462
  • GEARING-Roles https://bit.ly/3u9qdOI
  • Goulden, Marc, Mason, Mary Ann & Frasch, Karie (2011). Keeping Women in the Science Pipeline. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211416925
  • Helmke, Gretchen & Levitsky, Steven (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725-740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472
  • Holt, Helle, & Lewis, Suzan (2011). ‘You Can Stand on Your Head and Still End Up with Lower Pay’: Gliding Segregation and Gendered Work Practices in Danish ‘Family‐friendly’ Workplaces. Gender, Work & Organization, 18, e202-e221. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0432.2009.00501.X
  • Humbert, Anne. L., Kelan, Elisabeth., & van den Brink, Marieke. (2019). The Perils of Gender Beliefs for Men Leaders as Change Agents for Gender Equality. European Management Review, 16(4), 1143–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12325
  • Kelan, Elisabeth K. (2018). Men doing and undoing gender at work: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 544-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12146
  • Killeen, Lauren., López-Zafra, Esther, & Eagly, Alice (2006). Envisioning oneself as a leader: Comparisons of women and men in Spain and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(3), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00299.x
  • Konrad, Alison M., & Linnehan, Frank (1995). Formalized HRM structures: coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 787-820. https://doi.org/10.2307/256746
  • Kossek, Ellen & Lautsch, Brenda. A. (2012). Work–family boundary management styles in organizations: A cross-level model. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(2), 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386611436264
  • Lowndes, Vivien (2014). How Are Things Done Around Here? Uncovering Institutional Rules and Their Gendered Effects. Politics and Gender, 10(4), 685-691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1400049X
  • Lutter, Mark & Schröder, Martin (2019). Is There a Motherhood Penalty in Academia? The Gendered Effect of Children on Academic Publications in German Sociology. European Sociological Review, 36(3), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz067
  • Mackay, Fiona, Kenny, Maryl & Chappell, Louise (2011). New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31(5), 573-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110388788
  • Mahoney, James & Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), (2010). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Manfredi, Simonetta (2017). Increasing Gender Diversity in Senior Roles in HE: Who is Afraid of Positive Action? Administrative Sciences, 7(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7020019
  • March, James & Olsen, Johan (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organisational Basis of Politics. USA: Free Press.
  • Mason, Karen. O. & Smith, Herbert L. (2003). Women’s empowerment and social context: Results from five Asian countries. Gender and Development Group, World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1.1.200.6209
  • McGrath, John E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol. 14). USA: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (2017) ‘Científicas en Cifras: Estadísticas e indicadores de la (des)igualdad de género en la formación y profesión científica’.
  • Moreno-Colom, Sara (2015). Tiempo, trabajo y bienestar: relato de un conflicto cotidiano. In Enrique Martin and Carlos Rodriguez (Eds) Conflictos por el tiempo: poder, relación salarial y relaciones de género (pp. 145-168). Spain: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS).
  • Mun, Eunmi & Brinton, Mary. C. (2015). Workplace matters: The use of parental leave policy in Japan. Work and Occupations, 42(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415574781
  • O’Connor, Pat (2020). Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(2), 207-228, https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1737903
  • Power, Andrew (2021) Understanding leadership in higher education as a tool for change in relation to gender, in Drew, Eileen & Canavan, Siobhán (eds), The Gender-Sensitive University: A contradiction in terms? United Kingdom: Routledge
  • Schein, Edgar H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Timmers, Tanya, Willemsen, Tineke & Tijdens, Kea (2010) Gender diversity policies in universities: A multi-perspective framework of policy measures. Higher Education, 59(6), 719-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9276-z
  • Van Engen, Marloes, Van der Leeden, Rien & Willemsen, Tineke (2001). Gender, context and leadership styles: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 581-598. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150910996399
  • Waylen, Georgina (2013). Informal Institutions, Institutional Change, and Gender Equality. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 212-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913510360
  • Zimmer, Lynn (1988). Tokenism and Women in the Workplace: The Limits of Gender-Neutral Theory. Social Problems, 35(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.2307/800667
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet